Posted on 05/07/2009 7:52:51 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
While channel-surfing recently, I stopped for a moment on a show featuring two lesbian roommates. As I watched them, I began pondering the question of the growing impact of homosexuals and radical feminists on our culture.
None of these thoughts are original to me and all have been written about and discussed ad nauseam. This little rant is really an exercise in catharsis.
At the individual level, I have personally known a few homosexuals and, in general, have found them to be quiet, respectful and intelligent. There are exceptions – such as the moron homo cited below -- but I haven’t personally met them and probably won’t.
Having said that, I fear that the homosexual – and the recent politically correct fervor to further legitimize that lifestyle – has done irreparable harm to our NATIONAL life and what remains of what many of us still call Western European Culture. When that impact is coupled with the rise of radical feminism, the product is a result from which the West may never recover. Allow me to explain:
The simple physiological fact is that homosexuals CANNOT reproduce. The current population replacement rate – the rate necessary to maintain the current native born population level -- for the United States is somewhere north of 2 children per couple. Homosexuals don’t HAVE kids. Add the radical feminist impact – which holds that motherhood is some form of slavery and has driven many women to seek “fulfillment” OUTSIDE the home -- and the current birth rate here is disturbingly FAR BELOW 2.1 per couple.
The other side of the demographic coin is that the virtually unrestrained immigration policies of past administrations have brought a huge influx of people from cultures radically different from that which existed here prior to the advent of PC, diversity, tolerance and all the other names by which many now call these self, nation and culture destroying behaviors. Add the millions and millions of illegals who are now placing such a physical and economic burden on the healthcare and school systems that natural born citizens are being taxed to death and/or cannot, themselves, get the services to which they would otherwise be entitled and it’s a recipe for chaos. And the politicians – who hope these new welfare recipients will support their perpetual reelection -- turn a blind eye.
And as these groups agitate and campaign for THEIR particular flavor of diversity and tolerance, they also give added traction to virtually EVERY OTHER flavor. As they change millions of minds and cause others to reconsider long-standing and time-tested value systems, they are turning our world upside down.
The effect of these factors is that the America in which many of us older folks grew up is disappearing at an alarming rate. As the nation many of us came to love – and donned uniforms to defend – drifts toward some sort of Balkanized Despotism, large segments of these new arrivals – who know little and care less of the traditions, values and history of this place and even refuse to learn the common tongue -- separate themselves into ghetto-like enclaves where outsiders are often not welcomed unless they’re spending money. We run the very serious risk of repeating the experiences of the former Yugoslavia from which some of my people came.
Speaking of whom, my great-great grandparents waited for years then stood in long lines at Ellis Island to be deloused, interrogated and told they had to learn English and our history and traditions and pass a test – something the Hispanics and radical Muslim terrorists strolling across the border with Mexico don’ t have to do.
The Clinton administration – well known for its tolerance of the gay lifestyle – published some statistics in connection with AIDS that startled many. Of course, the PC then rearing its ugly head prohibited all but the brave from commenting on any of that.
The CDC statistics showed that 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are 1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals, (the largest subset) 2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and 3. IV drug abusers who share needles. (Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn't it?) The remaining 15% are those who have contracted AIDS via other, non-sexual/non-drug means SUCH AS TRANSFUSIONS OF TAINTED BLOOD (which one homosexual "leader" on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research).
So, with the population replacement rate practically down to zero, we have the “leaders” of the homosexual community – who can do nothing to help raise that rate – encouraging their members to make ill or kill those of us who have and/or are having and raising kids here.
I find it fascinating that many members of the homosexual community and the radical feminists are on the front line of the assault on traditional values and seek to replace them with more tolerance, diversity and other politically correct nonsense. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
While their activities have produced short-term benefits for them, that diversity, tolerance and egalitarianism have also opened the door to the idea that no culture is “better” than any other. Obama – apparently having confused Chicago with America -- spent days recently apologizing to everyone he met for our defective, decadent and corrupt culture.
And that has brought to our shores a formerly foreign culture, the more radical elements of which are breeding at a rate well in excess of the rate among the indigenous population.
And, just as it already has in Great Britain and continental Europe, with those increasing numbers will come increased political and social power.
And with that will come a foreign ideology and law system.
And that foreign theology – that’d be Islam-- and law system – that’d be Sharia -- DOES NOT TOLERATE HOMOSEXUALITY and regards WOMEN AS CHATTEL WHO HAVE NO PERSONAL RIGHTS LET ALONE THE SORT OF FREEDOM TO WHICH THE FEMINISTS ARE ACCUSTOMED.
The bottom line, gays and ladies? You will: 1. fall under the headsman’s sword and/or 2. be confined to the house unless your man wants to take you somewhere, but only if you are garbed from head to toe. Did I mention that a man can probably rape and/or kill you and suffer no penalty?
So there you have it.
I’d urge you to think about these things while there MIGHT still be time to alter course.
PS: I had to get this out of my system BEFORE the new, improved congress passes the pending legislation making it a crime to post ANYTHING on the web that could in any way cause ANYONE emotional distress. Would it matter that it was factual? Nope! While it’s probable that the Supremes will rule it a violation of the First Amendment, I’d rather not squander my kids’ small inheritance on lawyers bringing the case.
When your lifestyle guarantees the end of your lineage, why would you be concerned about future demographics?
Problem is we don't breed true.
No, it’s a new ABC FANTASY SHOW, the fantasy being that we believed we could allow these creatures to have their way and NOT destroy America, the IDEA!
It isn't as if some wise man came forward and said, "You know, we've been wrong all these past thousands of years about marriage being between people of the opposite sex. Here's a list of great things America could accomplish if we added same sex couples to the marriage roster."
No one said that because no one could come up with such a list. Instead, we're told that the traditional concept of marriage...in fact, the actual definition of marriage...is wrong because it doesn't allow deviants to participate. Nothing good comes from that deviancy. We're just told that an institution with obvious positive attributes, an institution necessary for civilization to survive, should be changed irrevocably to accommodate people whose relevant behavior is completely negative. And that's considered a good enough argument for maybe thirty or forty percent of the population to go along with it. We're dealing here with a populace that is increasingly made up of sheep with no ability to discern between constructive and destructive, to discriminate between good and bad.
The nations and civilizations which don't go along with this nonsense will be the ones to survive long term, namely East Asia, India, and the Muslim world.
every argument the homosexuals use I can use for other groups
They serve no purpose on this planet at all and contribute nothing.
We as nature intended are here to keep our species alive , homosexuals therefore what they do is a unnatural act
if they say the bedroom their own 4 walls , then why are they wanting this in schools, why the need to go to public toilets and dog parks with strangers.
If they say well they are not hurting anyone and is not affecting me , well a man in his bedroom with his daughter is not hurting me, neither is the man who in sherborn MA(NO SURPRISE) was caught having sex with an animal.
The LDS is not hurting me and they keep it private in their bedroom.
About love, well so could a mother and a son say this, LDS church can say this, man with an animal can say this.
I love my sister but I feel no urge to have sex with her
every argument they use can be used for any kind of marriage and it would be interesting if the LDS church went to the north east like MA and said they wan their kind of marriage legalised.
Would the homosexuals stand by them , would the homosexuals say it is about civil rights?
No they would not
Why are not normal straight couples who are dating not getting civil unions?
The LDS church and others should go to court and get their marriage seen to . It is not something I want to see but if this is the only way for the people in this coiuntry to wake up then so be it and that would be the worst nightmare for homosexuals then
A reckless society, determined to self-destruct....
Interesting point....do you suppose that homosexuals are a suicidally cult....
Their tainted blood almost totally wiped out the population of people needing blood transfusions in the 80s.
How about that for a start.
The next thing they did was to divert billions upon billions of dollars and the time of many researchers to trying to cure a disease that spreads from anal intercourse.
The next thing they did was to make this disease spreading behavior as acceptable as they could.
For at least many of them, yes.
Looking at the HIV/AIDS thing in light of the fact that many of these folks have hundreds of unprotected sex encounters a year with multiple partners is akin to playing Russian Roulette — with your penis.
I got a dirty look from Mrs WBill during the local news last night. There were a half-dozen or so back-to-back news pieces on the school systems. All of the administrators who were interviewed were all liberal females (the attitudes and those stupid "trendy" glasses gave them away) or gay/metrosexual girly men.
I asked loudly "Are there any normal men in the school system?" The TV didn't answer....it rarely does when I argue with it.
You’re way overreacting with regard to homosexuals. You’re talking at most about 5% of the population. Always has been that way, always will.
You have much more reason to be concerned about radical feminists.
Well, gays are about 1-2% of the population, more closely. “Radical” feminists, I wouldn’t say are more than a few percents of women. They tend to be gay anyway.
They are more of a threat as they can get regular women to sometimes rally around them on an issue, and they have two protected class cards to play (three if they are black) compared to the one for gay men.
I’m concerned about BOTH.
As I attempted to point out in the piece, thanks to the idiocy of “diversity training” of our kids in the government schools and PC, BOTH groups have cultural influence FAR beyond their actual numbers.
If you don’t believe that, look up the debate the other day re. the hate crimes bill in the congress. They voted to PROTECT PEDOPHILES! CHILD MOLESTERS!!!!!
My God, man, open your eyes.
Oh, and as should be obvious by now, you’re not getting flamed by hardly anyone here. For the record, I think your post is way wrong , but you have the right to your opinion.
Ah, that pesky 2nd amendment thing again.
A tyrant need only be what percentage of the population?
They have the microphone and a DIS-proportionately loud voice in our affairs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.