Well, well, well.
If such a document came from this administration, surely it is regarded as more of a celebratory gesture than a warning.
Oh dear, I guess Barry is already having to come to grips with the consequences of imposing overly obvious economic suicide in the middle of a recession.
No problem, I don’t think he will have any difficulty ignoring Supreme Court diktat.
“...if the EPA proceeds with the regulation of heat-trapping gases, factories, small businesses and institutions would be subject to costly regulation.”
Subject to costly regulation? Try “cease operations.”
Everyone is missing the point. HEADLINE: Obama Solves Problem of Global Warming! Praise be to the almighty Obama!
Back when CO2 was declared a regulated pollutant, I said here that this was a good development. Because the EPA rules require that the agency prove that a material is hazardous before it can be regulated. This is the process that was abrogated back when Clinton declared second hand smoke to be a Class A Carcinogen.
This could finally be the thing that results in a rigorous, real examination of all this Global Warming nonsense. If so, it will be a very welcome development.
the Democrat Party getting ready to immolate itself on a bed of carbon
E.P.A.’s Greenhouse Gas Proposal Critiqued (Debunked)
New York Times | May 12, 2009 | John M. Broder
Posted on 05/12/2009 12:49:39 PM PDT by reaganaut1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2249468/posts
and the best part...
White House Unveils Tax-Rate Details
(hikes on couples with $235K of taxable income)
Wall Street Journal | May 12, 2009 | John D. McKinnon
Posted on 05/12/2009 9:12:17 AM PDT by reaganaut1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2249292/posts