Skip to comments.
No Fly List might become "No Gun" List
nationalgunrights.org ^
| 5/19/2009
| NA
Posted on 05/19/2009 12:50:16 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
1
posted on
05/19/2009 12:50:16 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I didn’t know that flying was a Constitutional right.
2
posted on
05/19/2009 12:52:53 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: neverdem
"Senator Ted Kennedy found his name on the list..."
Well that cinches it. We definitely don't want him having a gun...
3
posted on
05/19/2009 12:53:36 PM PDT
by
Hegemony Cricket
(The emperor has no pedigree.)
To: neverdem
If this passes, courts will eventually strike it down. Because the second amendment to the constitution has been held to protect an individual right to bear arms, McCarthy's bill would represent a prior restraint of a constitutional right.
It may eventually exist in some form, but there will have to be some sort of due process added in order to make it pass legal muster.
4
posted on
05/19/2009 12:54:09 PM PDT
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Tarpon
Rights don’t come from the Constitution.
5
posted on
05/19/2009 12:56:21 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: bamahead
6
posted on
05/19/2009 12:56:38 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: neverdem
Notorious Anti-gunner Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy has introduced a bill that would takes name from the so-called "no fly list" and place them in the National Instant Criminal Background Check system as ineligible to purchase a firearm. To hell with these damn laws, I'll follow my conscience.
7
posted on
05/19/2009 12:59:08 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We either Free America ourselves, or it is midnight for humanity for a thousand years.)
To: Tarpon
Wrong way to look at this. What clause in the Constitution gives the FedGov this power? I can’t think of one...
To: neverdem
Hey Steni, have you seen this?
I thought we were supposed to have defeated the leftists on new gun legislation.
Dumb dumb...
9
posted on
05/19/2009 1:00:07 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
To: neverdem
This is evil.
There’s no way literally short of an act of Congress, to get off the no-fly list.
This is just.
Keep looking up, Christians. Any day now.
10
posted on
05/19/2009 1:00:12 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: neverdem
Sorry congresswoman. The people on the list already have guns or can get them anytime they want whether this got passed or not.
To: Tarpon
I didnt know that flying was a Constitutional right.It isn't, but you have the cart before the horse. This is where the Brady NICS check goes wrong. People can be denied their rights recognized by the Second Amendment denied without due process.
12
posted on
05/19/2009 1:01:04 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: djsherin
Neither does flying ... But I think you know what I meant.
The difference between and enumerated Constitutional Right and flying on an airplane is quite distinct.
13
posted on
05/19/2009 1:02:10 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: Hegemony Cricket
"Senator Ted Kennedy found his name on the list..." Well that cinches it. We definitely don't want him having a gun...
Kennedy is proof you don't need a gun to kill someone.
To: neverdem
Ripe territory for a suit ... Once the SC recognized the Second Amendment defined an individual right, the boundaries need to be litigated for determination.
Once the enumerated threshold was crossed in Heller, the bar went way up.
We need more lawyers willing to pursue
15
posted on
05/19/2009 1:05:08 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: Tarpon
If the pilot or his company allows you to fly for whatever price, and you agree, then certainly you do have a right to fly. Where is the federal government allowed to prevent 2 parties from exchanging goods and services?
16
posted on
05/19/2009 1:06:44 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: neverdem
Kennedy should be on the list. Hell, all the booze on the flight would disappear if he were on my flight and I would be pissed.
17
posted on
05/19/2009 1:07:30 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.)
To: neverdem
California has the fruits and we in NY have the nuts.
18
posted on
05/19/2009 1:08:44 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.)
To: djsherin
Uhh, that would be a contract, not a right. Rights come from God.
The liberals have tried mightly to change the language regarding rights, healthcare, marriage rights and so on, and only partially succeeded. It worked with liberal though.
19
posted on
05/19/2009 1:10:07 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: Tarpon
And do you not have a right to contract?
Does the federal government have the Constitutional power to prevent you from making contracts with other parties?
20
posted on
05/19/2009 1:13:01 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson