Posted on 05/23/2009 10:28:20 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
A friend recently forwarded me a link to Anne Coulter's latest column with the following comment:
"Anne's Coulter's latest column is entitled: "Notre Dame Holds First Alan Keyes Fundraiser"Here is a multiple choice test:
Anne Coulter uses Alan Keyes' name to
a. piggyback off of Dr. Keyes' fame and courage in order to get people to read her column (Dr. Keyes is never even mentioned in the body of the article)
b. give herself credibility by creating the appearance of being on the same side of the abortion issue as Dr. Keyes
c. to distract readers from realizing that she explains (in two consecutive sentences) that Roe v. Wade is both "lawless" and "the law of the land"
d. promote her latest "pro-life" idea of allowing the people the right to vote on whether or not babies can be killed."
Naturally I took a look at the column. My friend was right. Except for the shrewdly deceptive title, my name did not figure in the article at all. As I reflected on this oddity, one possibility occurred to me in addition to the choices listed. The title leaves the impression that somehow or another I benefited financially from what I did and endured at Notre Dame.
In reality, nothing could be further from the truth....
(Excerpt) Read more at loyaltoliberty.com ...
So we should just cut them off because currently they have superior weaponry?
Pushing commie Mitt is a difficult job. You people be nice and keep looking at the black dress.
If that’s how you see it you should go talk to him about it at Loyal to Liberty.
I have earthly no idea what you’re talking about.
If thats how you see it you should go talk to him about it at Loyal to Liberty.
Sorry, I am no fan of Ann Coulter. I find her to be an embarrassment — a crude, rude and obnoxious woman who probably does more harm than good for our causes.
It’s the same Constitutional purism that has led to Ron Paul being savaged by people who don’t care about such things. Constitutionally speaking, we have no business getting entangled in the affairs of another country. I support Israel, myself, and do not begrudge the support we’ve provided them. But, it’s also not something our nation should be engaging in, under original intent. I see both sides. If Israel weren’t under constant existential threat, I’d agree with Paul and the CP regarding Israel.
You’re right. Sorry.
Not its not, Mitt was only a raging communist evil pos when he was governor of Mass and occasionally when he thought it would help him win an election. Other than that he is a true conservative hero, like Arnold.
That's how I see it, and I posted my thoughts on the matter to the thread you created on Free Republic.
That will sufficiently suffice. Thanks for the invitation, though.
No, we should cut EVERYONE off because we're currently financially/economically SCREWED.
No problem.
Oops,
That should read:
“Yes it is” rather than “Not its not” and “only” should have been “always”
I hope you can enjoy part of the Memorial Day weekend. This holding up the world stuff is really hard on a person.
Did I tell you what a great job you are doing? I think the landscape is going Independent....with much thanks to the biggest bullie commie admin in the history of the US in bed with big government globalist "conservative" commies.
You totally win.
ROTFL..
Why didn’t you just post the whole thing if you thought it was worthwhile enough to read?
You made my day. Thanks.
I’ll try to take a break. :-)
Hey, I did go weed my garden this morning! lol...
I only have permission to do so on AIPNEWS.
This is what has always bothered me about CP candidates....they are anti-Israel and typically nutjobs
But....are’nt all political candidates nutjobs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.