Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Remember the Coburn Amendment .

Roll call vote

27 rats voted for it. IMHO, we can derail this racist.

1 posted on 05/27/2009 7:06:32 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
hoperoachprompters

The RATS love her. Fat chance of changing any of their minds.

2 posted on 05/27/2009 7:13:34 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If the one from her circuit comes before the SC she should recuse herself and have no say in it further. I don’t look for that to happen. Agendas take precedence over correct action.


3 posted on 05/27/2009 7:16:03 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“We are therefore persuaded that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment and applies it against the states and local governments.”

This may be beside the point, but I’ve never understood the incorporation principle. What does the due process clause of the 14th amendment have to do with the specific enumerations of the Bill of Rights? Nothing. Due process is all about PROCESS. Free speech, gun rights, etc. are not procedural issues; they are substantive issues.

That being said, you don’t really need the incorporation principle to imagine that the protection of gun rights extends to the states. Unlike the provisions of the first amendment, the second amendment doesn’t specify that Congress should make no law, etc. All it says is that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Since the Constitution, in addition to enumerating the powers of the federal government, also denies certain powers to state governments, we can perhaps assume that the second amendment named the infringment of gun rights as one of the powers denied to the states. Certainly, I don’t see anything in the second amendment that says it doesn’t apply to the states.


4 posted on 05/27/2009 7:22:27 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I would say that she is a perfect match for liberals, a terrible choice for conservatives and a mixed bag as far as the libertarians are concerned at least as far as the libertarian party goes.

Libertarian Party Platform:

Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through “political borders”.

Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.

Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.

Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.

Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.

Advertising drugs, prostitution, pornography; zero restrictions.

Military Strength; minimal capabilities.


5 posted on 05/27/2009 7:28:24 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Sotomayor joined in an unsigned opinion embracing the district court's analysis without offering any analysis of its own.

Too chicken to commit by signing and had absolutely nothing to base the bigoted racist decision on.

"It is settled law," Sotomayor and the Second Circuit held,

Yep, just like Al Gor’s “settled science” and “all scientists agree” B.S.

This racist pinhead is going to be screeching to the commie MSM for decades. Perhaps she will be the poster-commie for why Americans should not vote for communist agenda “democrats” that will stick in memory for generations.

6 posted on 05/27/2009 7:33:46 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
With her compelling personal story, which stretches from a Bronx, New York housing project to Yale Law School to the federal Second Circuit Court of Appeals,...

Maybe I am jaded, maybe I just don't understand how the Bronx is so different, but I just don't get what is so compelling about her life story. At all.

12 posted on 05/27/2009 11:08:56 PM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle; bamahead; sickoflibs; nw_arizona_granny

ping


15 posted on 05/28/2009 5:27:47 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; neverdem; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
16 posted on 05/28/2009 6:52:10 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump


18 posted on 05/28/2009 10:19:24 AM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson