Skip to comments.
Supreme Court asked to block Chrysler sale to Fiat
Associated Press ^
| June 7, 2009
| MARK SHERMAN
Posted on 06/07/2009 5:29:35 AM PDT by libstripper
Opponents of Chrysler's sale to Fiat are asking the Supreme Court to block the deal. Three Indiana state pension and construction funds filed emergency papers at the high court early Sunday to put the sale on hold so they can pursue an appeal.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; chrysler; fiat; michigan; obama; pensionfunds; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Of all the stories running today, this is the one to watch.
To: libstripper; moder_ator
This is the third thread.
2
posted on
06/07/2009 5:30:33 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
To: libstripper
The funds also challenged the constitutionality of the Treasury Department's use of Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, funds to supply Chrysler's bankruptcy protection financing. They say the Treasury did so without congressional authority.
The constitutionality of tarp is nonexistent.
3
posted on
06/07/2009 5:33:19 AM PDT
by
allmost
To: libstripper
4
posted on
06/07/2009 5:35:17 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
To: hoosiermama
Thread policeperson, is this a crime?
:)
5
posted on
06/07/2009 5:37:24 AM PDT
by
allmost
To: libstripper
6
posted on
06/07/2009 5:39:13 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
To: libstripper
Ruth Bader Ginsburg has to decide in favor of the unconstitutional actions of the muslim or protect the teacher’s pensions.
She can punt this up to the full Court or make the decision herself.
7
posted on
06/07/2009 5:45:02 AM PDT
by
Carley
(OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
To: Carley
Constatuution?
Whhaat Constatuution?
We doon’ need us no steenking Constatuution no mo’.
We be sensativve an’ all.
We be WISE HISPANICS, now.
STFU wit’ yo’ Constatuution, n’all.
8
posted on
06/07/2009 5:49:37 AM PDT
by
Flintlock
I searched and didn’t find anything.
To: hoosiermama
This is from AP and I searched before posting.
To: Carley
Is she awake?
Actual artist rendition of Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg asleep during hearing
11
posted on
06/07/2009 5:54:54 AM PDT
by
COUNTrecount
(http://obamaclock.org/)
To: allmost
Wonder how long until we get the Obama court-packing scheme?
To: libstripper; All
If the SCOTUS and the POTUS are truly in cahoots,
And the birth certificate issue has become, mostly moot,
The Usurper can feel free, to spend all the federal loot,
Even though he is ineligible, and nothing but an empty suit!
The POTUS and the SCOTUS are now laughing at the sheeple,
While wiping all their asses with that 'We The People' paper,
Our friends become our enemies, and our enemies vicea verse,
It may certainly be concluded, that America's been cursed!
So Chrysler goes to Fiat, and General Motors to the Feds,
And you know it won't be long before the mighty dollar's dead,
And martial law and rationing are not that far ahead,
So hide your guns and ammo, and remember what I've said.
13
posted on
06/07/2009 6:04:17 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
To: DrGunsforHands
Have to assume it’s already happening.
14
posted on
06/07/2009 6:04:17 AM PDT
by
allmost
To: libstripper
;-)
15
posted on
06/07/2009 6:09:05 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
To: allmost
The constitutionality of tarp is nonexistent. Bingo! TARP essentially gave Paulson and Bernanke a blank check, unlimited in funds, for whatever purpose they saw fit. The original purpose was to provide mortgage relief for homeowners facing foreclosure. That quickly got changed to a bank bailout, then an automaker bailout.
There were warnings out there this would happen, but they were cries in the wilderness.
The time to have mounted the challenge was when TARP bailed out the banks. Too late now.
16
posted on
06/07/2009 6:11:30 AM PDT
by
randita
To: hoosiermama
17
posted on
06/07/2009 6:13:03 AM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: libstripper
Thank you for starting this thread, I missed the previous threads.
It is coming to light about the various funds, be they private or public that have and will take big losses with the polices of the 0bama Socialism.
Even a nearby city of 200,000, Springfield, Missouri has a shortage of 12 million dollars in the police and firepersons pension funds. Voters have rejected an additional sales tax to make up the shortfall.
The chickens are coming home to roost across the land.
18
posted on
06/07/2009 6:16:14 AM PDT
by
TYVets
To: Carley
She can decide to grant the stay (in effect a temporary injunction on the Bankruptcy Court's authorization of the sale) pending consideration by the entire SCOTUS of the appellant's substantive claim or she can defer the decision to impose the stay to the entire SCOTUS. She cannot rule on the substantive issue, alone.
To: allmost
The fireworks won’t really start to fly until his policies are ruled unconstitutional. FDR was more popular during his terms than almost any other president. If the Supreme Court could stand up to him, they can most certainly stand up to BHO. Good thing Obama can’t seem to learn from the mistakes of the past.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson