Posted on 06/11/2009 4:25:50 PM PDT by IrishMike
James Von BRUNN.
LIBERAL assassin, SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST, MOONBAT al Qaeda supporter born in Amarica, American hater.
This guy and the mayhem he caused is going to sink like a stone in the MSM, ‘cause it doesn’t advance the agenda.
But they are STILL calling him a “right wing extremist”.
B Hussein Obama or J Von Brunn ?
Sounds like he could have been buddies with Ward Churchill, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Cindy Sheehan
The old bastard probably drove all the way to DC with his left turn signal on.
Well, this is the last we have heard of this guy in the MSM. On to gun control.
http://www.esquire.com/the-side/feature/racists-support-obama-061308
the left ignores the fact that Nazis are and were left wing not right wing too
good one, good one, so is that wacko CNN non-journalist Sanchez and his other lib wacko liar counterparts going to man up and apologize for their false accusations?
of course not. reminds me of Sharpton vilifying the Duke lacrosee players, and not apologizing when they were found innocent.
typical Lib hypocrisy.
I thought I read on Fox that what ticked this guy off is that somebody cut off his social security benefits. Now who did that?
more.
Weekly Standard (Conservative Magazine) may have been shooter (Von Brunn) target
Politico
Posted on 06/11/2009 10:45:16 AM PDT by mnehring
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2269701/posts
Holocaust shooting signals race turmoil, some say
Townhall / AP | June 11, 2009 | Jesse Washington, Debroah Hastings & Eileen Sullivan
Posted on 06/11/2009 5:31:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2270024/posts
But they are STILL calling him a “right wing extremist”.
______________________________________________
Well of course ‘they’ are. It’s called being illiterate and gullible.
Took the left all of 20 minutes to accuse the shooter of being a white male supremacist conservative.
The left never identified the background of the Ar shooter.
And that’s “fairness” :)
BUSH HATER
(Last two paragraphs)
The site that was posted at "supports Chavez, quotes Ahmadinejad at length and is very upset by America supporting Israel’s “genocide” against those poor innocent Palestinians”
ANTI CHRISTIAN WHO POSTED ON ATHEIST SITE
“What better way to destroy a Nation -- any Nation -- than to undermine her hubris; her gods, ethics, mores, history, her gene-pool -- in short, Saul would DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE. Saul created a bogus a la Spielberg docu-drama stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation -- a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep -- he named his hoax "Christianity." …CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.” ANTICHRIST.COM
NEO-CON HATER
1st large paragraph
9-11 TRUTHER
(7 or 8 paragraphs from bottom)
HATES FREE TRADE
Top of page 110
JEW HATER (DO WE REALLY NEED A LINK FOR THIS?)
SUPPORTS SOCIALISM
Top of page 110
FOX NEWS’ O'REILLY HATER
1st large paragraph
WEEKLY STANDARD HATER
Conservative Magazine Targeted By Shooter
THINKS THEM JEWS ARE KEEPING HIM FROM OBAMA
Ooops, thats Rev Wright, Not Brunn
CHEERED THE KILLINGS OF US CONTRACTORS IN IRAQ
Ooops, that was Democrat Underground
Still waiting on more proof he was a registered democrat other than the claim on this blog
When I heard James Von BRUNN was a WW2 vet, I figured he would be a registered Dem. The FDR generation was one of the most Dem favored generation since the millenium generation (1982 to 2000).
I think that Jonah Godberg's view of the political spectrum as a circle is closer to being correct. If either the right or left goes too far in their respective directions, fascism and totalitarianism is the result.
Of course we probably haven't seen a dominant form of right wing fascism since Mussolini in the West. It appears that right-wing fascism is much more rare than left-wing fascism.
Mussolini was left wing.
Fascism is left wing.
The only difference between Communism and Fascism is that Communists seek to own the means of production. Fascists seek to control the means of production.
They are BOTH left wing, big-government, statist totalitarian ideologies.
Sincerely hope this was helpful.
if we look at the political spectrum as being :
anarchy(no government personal freedom) being the left as any society can go, placing that at the left for a liberal as can be government... and at the far right totalitarianism where the government owns everything including the people... then i would have to say, both political parties are far too close to totalitarianism than i would want.
teeman
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.