Fox News: Iranian Soldiers firing at will into crowds demonstrating against election theft

Fox News Channel | 6/15/09

[TomasUSMC]

This is the last chance the Iranians have of avoiding being used as cannon fodder by the mullahs in a Nuclear War with Israel.

[Jack Black]

"Who was supposed to react and who is making you watch it? Why is what is going on in another country your or this country’s responsibility? Why are you trying to drag the rest of us into another country’s issues? We have our country for a reason and that is so we don’t have to act like nor be treated like those in other countries. If something like Tiananmen Square happens here we will take care of it our way ourselves."

Yes, I agree. I am very interested about events in Iran. However, it is great that the USA has no role in it. In fact I don't even object to B. Hussein not saying anything. What can he say? He's not Ronald Reagan, is he.

[Jack Black]

"Who was supposed to react and who is making you watch it? Why is what is going on in another country your or this country’s responsibility? Why are you trying to drag the rest of us into another country’s issues? We have our country for a reason and that is so we don’t have to act like nor be treated like those in other countries. If something like Tiananmen Square happens here we will take care of it our way ourselves."

Yes, I agree. I am very interested about events in Iran. However, it is great that the USA has no role in it. In fact I don't even object to B. Hussein not saying anything. What can he say? He's not Ronald Reagan, is he.

[meyer]

These are not soldiers, but Pasdaran and Basij paramilitaries.

Sounds like Iran's rendition of ACORN. Coming to a city near you.

[NormsRevenge]

I thought CNN just made it clear things where back to normal in the capital. Shops open. Folks sleezing about on their foot sandals etc..
—

Would that be the same CNN that kissed up to Saddam? uggh.

[CodeToad]

Agreed. Our only statement should be really nothing. We either accept the country as a country and who they place as their leader or we don’t. We have no right to demand anything. If that country gets out of control only then do we have the right to do something about it if, and only if, it affects this country. That is why we have countries; so people can live as they please without influence of others.

I sure as Hell don’t want the likes of Iran telling me and my country a damned thing. We’ll handle ourselves, thank you very much. If we need, help we’ll ask. If they need help, they are free to ask.

Reagan would probably be diplomatic and express this country’s hope that Iran has free and open elections and the people find the leader they desire and deserve, and leave it at that. If they elect Imanutjob again, Reagan would probably just repeat our previously stated position about Iran.

We have enough issues here at home to be worried about how other nations hold elections. Our own elections have enough corruption. What if Iran wanted to butt in and try to demand we clean up that corruption or else they take action?

Besides, do you really want Obama to say anything? The more he speaks the more of an ass he makes of himself and this nation.

[Marine_Uncle]

I think so NR. Same cast of asshole*.

[M. Espinola]

With at least 3 million fed up Iranians in the streets, it would be a fine opportunity to add a few more marksmen to remove the régime, one or two at a time. It’s only wishful thinking considering the one in the White House supports the tyrant of Tehran who stole this election and is acting just like his favourite arms salesman -— Putin!