Posted on 06/21/2009 7:28:09 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
The Birth Certificate Question
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:44:05 PM · 99 of 113
We have no proof of where Obama was born. Anyone who claims that he was born in Hawaii is suffering from COLB Derangement Syndrome. Hawaii never confirmed that he was born in Hawaii, never confirmed that he has a Hawaiian long-form birth certificate or any other US birth certificate on file, or even if they have anything tangible beyond a computer record.
Most of all, Hawaii confirmed that they never released a copy of Obama’s COLB to anyone in June 2007.
Einstein could have called himself, "Humpty Dumpty," and hid his face, but that would not change the fact that he discovered E=mc². Likewise, Obama’s 2007 COLB would be just as nonexistent as if I had never discovered that it was nonexistent. But, it is a good thing that I did.
It's positively amazing the amount of effort that people have expended in defense of this piece of crap COLB image that the Poseur-in-Chief now admits to posting online. There is only one reason why, after more than a year, that only one scan image of one side only has ever been made from what is alleged to be Obama’s 2007 COLB: it doesn't exist. Obama’s 2007 COLB is a forged fake, fabricated in Photoshop, and nothing that anyone says or does can change that fact.
There is absolutely no reason, whatsoever, that the Obama Campaign would not make another, more detailed scan, including one of the reverse side of the COLB, and send that out to quiet critics. No reason, EXCEPT that the document does not exist in the real world. It only exists in the unreal, virtual world of Photoshopped fakes.
BTW, a digital photo is not the same thing as a scan image, and it most certainly cannot be used to validate a scan image. Certainly not when the document object is photographed at a steep angles from the capture device (which were intentional).
Remember that Factcheck.org did not take a digital photo of the reverse side (all that Factcheck photographed was only 1/4 of the entire back page, and only 2/3 of the Seal). Why was so little of the back page shown? Because what was photographed belonged to a different COLB!! Check it out for yourself: the Seal on the reverse side does not match the one on the front side. It is one of several, new discoveries I've made after revisitng the Factcheck photographs.
A year later after the bogus scan image was posted, THAT is exactly what people are still talking about. They are referring back to the original forged image on Fight the Smears and Factcheck. They are quoting Factcheck -- the co-conspirator in this birth certficate scam -- as having "verified" the bogus "scan image."
Recall that Factcheck claimed they photographed the same object that the Obama Campaign scanned two months earlier.
They took these photos SOLELY IN DEFENSE of the scan image that they alleged to have "validated," and to fend off the widespread criticism of the COLB as a forged image. However, they failed to "debunk" the critics. This was all part of an elaborate ruse to create the illusion that Obama had released his genuine, certified original birth certificate to the public.
What is hard to believe are the people in high places who actually believe that this document exists, but of those, here is a segment who also discount it as being proof of where Obama was actually born. COLBs are incredibly easy to get with little documentation required. And, yes, it is a well-documented fact that Hawaii was giving COLBs to foreign-born children.
But the bottom line is that the original "scan image" is what people are still talking about today, and it is an indisputable fact that Obama, or anyone else, does not have a genuine 2007 COLB document. What is posted online is as bogus as a four-dollar bill.
Obama ascended to the position of President by fraudulent means, including document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and campaign funding fraud, to name a few. The only question at hand now is whether he will be removed by invalidating his election, or by the articles of impeachment. If I were a Democratic Congressman, and I was going to be implicated in this fraud, I'd be calling for impeachment in a New York minute.
FReeper Ron Polarik, Ph D State: Colorado
We all know he is a fraud. Yet it seems nothing will be done about it!
Good update. The truth must be circulated far and wide as the party in question is working on sinking the USA.
If you were a Democrat Congressman you wouldn't care if you were implicated. Because you would know that you and he were going to get away with it.
As long as the Dems (and a sickening number of Pubbies) march in lock step, this will continue. And I see no reason they won't. If someone else here does, please tell me. I need something to hold on to.
Only a Natural Born citizen of the United Staes can be legally elected.
Obama was not elected, he came to the Presidency by a Coup de’ tat.
I find it odd that the background is in green. You have to keep in mind, the year is 1961 and real documents then (more likely than not) would have been black and white.
Note the comment at the bottom of the document pictured in post number 2. It says something to the effect that this document is proof of the fact of birth in any court proceedings. Can anyone comment on the meaning of that statement?
Who's your daddy now????
I’m sure it’s been discussed countless times somewhere, but he wasn’t born Barack, was he? He was Barry.
I wonder about blackmail from foreign operatives. They could hold “proof” over Obama’s head—Pravda is well aware of this situation, reporting in detail about it, so surely the international audience is well aware.
I imagine some would resort to ruthless methods to get ‘evidence’ and then use it as a card against Obama. Maybe this is why he does not like to challenge these thugocracies....but rather trying to ‘play nice’ with them?
Would love to know the truth........................
Father’s Race - AFRICAN? Oops, methinks they meant to photoshop that other, other dark race - Negro..
What?
You mean your race isn’t ‘American’??
;)
Keep in mind that color adds to the cost of a document and recording births something, that for the governments, is a simple statement of fact. The only other BC’s I have seen with color were printed on yellow paper but not full color.
All of the BC’s I have ever seen contain all the information we are insisting would be on a BC.
The fraudulent one, by Barry, contains very little information typical to a BC and is rife with mistakes.
Who is the Manchurian Candidate?
There is no proof at all as to the true identity of Obama The Usurper.
Where are the documents to prove he is really Barack Obama, Barry Sotero or anyone at all?
Where is his most recent US passport?
Or the government passport records from the years he supposedly attended Columbia?
Didn’t he ever have a drivers license with a photo?
What about a school ID?
A draft card or record of registration for the draft?
What about a federal form I9 that requires varous forms of photo ID to prove citizenship or residency status when applying for a job?
No one but the usurper himself knows who he really is.
Why would he spend huge sums of money to avoid showing everyday documents that all other citizens must show many times through their lives?
Even part-time census takers have to prove who they are before the government will employ them.
The collapse of an unbiased, independent media in this country has helped make this situation possible.
That's the first I've seen of this - any source for this "confirmation"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.