Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brit Hume Warns Obama: The Honeymoon Won’t Last Forever [warned that if “he is really as sensitive"]
Newsbusters ^

Posted on 06/23/2009 2:03:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Brit Hume Warns Obama: The Honeymoon Won’t Last Forever By Sam Theodosopoulos Created 2009-06-23 15:48

As Media Research Center VP for Research and Publications Brent Baker reported two days ago, the roundtable for ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday took up the media’s favoritism toward President Obama. Host George Stephanopoulos marveled at “how obsessed the President and the White House are with Fox News,” prompting columnist George Will to observe that’s because “it’s the discordant note in an otherwise harmonious chorus.”

Hume responded by acknowledging that: “Every president has a honeymoon period when critics lay off,” but usually when a president has been this active so early in changing the status quo, “the honeymoon tends to end pretty quickly.”

Hume suggested that Obama may be denouncing Fox News because it “gives him a fig leaf against the idea that this is a President who is riding the wave of media adoration and approval.” He also warned that if “he is really as sensitive” as Stephanopoulos suggests, “he better get over it,” because the honeymoon he is having...is not going to last forever.”

Here is the transcript for the segment:

BILL O’REILLY: I want to get on to Obama criticizing Fox News. The story doesn't die. Yesterday it rose again on ABC. Roll the tape.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I have always been struck, and it is not too strong a word, on how obsessed the President and the White House are with Fox News.

GEORGE WILL: Well, it's the discordant note in otherwise harmonious chorus, I suppose that's why.

BILL O’REILLY: You have covered a lot of presidents. Is President Obama handling Fox News, which is to be honest the most skeptical news organization on television of him as you heard George Will say. And pretty much everybody knows. The other networks, either are very approving of him or actually promote him. So, is Obama handling the dissent that he finds in some quarters on this network any differently than other presidents handled dissent.

BRIT HUME: It's hard to say. We have never had a situation quite like this one. We have Never had an administration -- I mean all administrations get a honeymoon up to a certain point. Bill Clinton had a very brief one because there were a number of stumbles in the early going. There is a certain honeymoon period which when critics lay off. When a President as activist as this one has been this early, in times like these the honeymoon tends to end pretty quickly. It's still going on and likely to continue for some time. As you heard George Will point out in the clip you played we are the only discordant note which is not to say that I agree with his absurd assertion last week that all he gets is criticism.

BILL O’REILLY: We are clearly tougher on him than any of the other networks. Everybody knows that. And our ratings reflect that as we grow in power and the others decline. But Obama now by bringing attention to us in a very public way, he actually helps Fox News.

BRIT HUME: It certainly doesn't hurt us, it may be useful to him in that it gives him a fig leaf against the idea that this is a President who is riding this wave of media adoration and approval and that he is not being appropriately challenged. That may be useful to him in some way. I'm bound to say this, Bill. If he is really as sensitive about this and obsessed as George Stephanopoulos suggests, he better get over it, because this honeymoon is he having and treatment from the media is not going to last forever. It never does with a President. If he doesn't like what he is did getting from us amid all the rest of this, he really going to hate it later on.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhohoneymoon; foxnews; hume; oreilly; second100days
hee, hee....
1 posted on 06/23/2009 2:03:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
video of britt's comments
2 posted on 06/23/2009 2:05:17 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Tell him, Brit! He’ll find out for himself soon. LOL!


3 posted on 06/23/2009 2:09:53 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Don’t bet on it ending. The media created him, and will stick it out to the end.


4 posted on 06/23/2009 2:10:29 PM PDT by SoDak (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Did ya’ll see BHO reaction when Major Garrett of FOX NEWS had the audacity to ask him “that took you so long?” Asking about O’s silence on standing up for freedom for Iranian people! Then the prez wouldn't answer when Major asked about the invite to Iranian diplomats going to party with BHO on July 4th. What a sorry excuse! I have bigger balls than the current occupant of the WH!
5 posted on 06/23/2009 2:15:53 PM PDT by missanne (That's all I can stands and I can't stands no more?? This is one of those days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does this mean that Williams fellow from NBC who is sharing Obama’s bed is going to cut him off?


6 posted on 06/23/2009 2:17:20 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
Brit may be overly optimistic on this one. The media have too much invested in Obama.

I don't recall GWB having much of a honeymoon. Not only were the media convinced that Gore would have been president if the Supreme Court had not "selected" Bush, but they were busy attacking Ashcroft and denouncing Bush for wanting to poison the children with arsenic. When the Florida recounts finally showed that Bush would have won Florida's electoral votes anyway, that received virtually no attention in the media.

7 posted on 06/23/2009 2:19:47 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Every president has a honeymoon period when critics lay off,”.....

Honeymoon my ass! The minute I heard his name it was over!


8 posted on 06/23/2009 2:28:41 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

Last summer before the election there were all kinds of rumors running rampant here at FR, but one of the more interesting ones was that a fairly-high profile staffer from one of the big three networks was intoxicated at a D.C. party and let it slip that her network was supporting Obama and wanted to see him elected not because they were enamored with him but because he and his associates were so corrupt that the network’s ratings would spike sky-high not long into his presidency.

I always wondered if there were even a kernel of truth to it.


9 posted on 06/23/2009 2:34:31 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

omg, the horse is out of the barn now.......... roflmao,,, these poor libtards are starting to sing another song now, aren’t they?


10 posted on 06/23/2009 2:41:21 PM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Mac Conchradha - "Skeagh mac en chroe"- Skaghvicencrowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Every president has a honeymoon period when critics lay off,”
This is a load of hooie.
G.W. Bush was harassed and treated like dirt from the giddy up.


11 posted on 06/23/2009 2:45:02 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

He’s TOO BIG to fail.

That’s what they’ll say.


12 posted on 06/23/2009 2:46:27 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nope, not going to happen. They went Black, they can’t come back.

Obama would play the race card so fast that heads will spin.

The State-run-media will not give up on their guy, they will go down with/on him if they must.

Besides, after Obama has had his fun, it’s his wife’s turn at the helm.

America screwed itself with this guy and America is going to pay dearly.


13 posted on 06/23/2009 2:54:21 PM PDT by Gator113 (I live in "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world." Imam Obama told me so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Last summer before the election there were all kinds of rumors running rampant here at FR, but one of the more interesting ones was that a fairly-high profile staffer from one of the big three networks was intoxicated at a D.C. party and let it slip that her network was supporting Obama and wanted to see him elected not because they were enamored with him but because he and his associates were so corrupt that the network’s ratings would spike sky-high not long into his presidency.

I always wondered if there were even a kernel of truth to it.


I remember that post. The way I remember the post the press had plenty of dirt on Obama but they were going to keep quiet until sometime after election and then they would let loose on Obama in order to get their ratings up. Like you, I wonder if their any truth to it.

God knows that as a Chicago machine politician, Obama has been in many dirty deals but the question is whether the State Run Media will report on any of them. Right now, I would say no.
14 posted on 06/23/2009 3:05:08 PM PDT by Ticonderoga34 (Liberals are hypocrites and phonies. Associate with them at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson