Blogger Hal Turner Charged With Threatening Chicago-Area Judges (web posts are being watched)

Hartford Courant ^ | 6-25-09 | Edmund Mahony

[Calpernia]

I do find that a lot of liberals support guns for themselves; but not for others. SPCA Animal Officers are good examples.

[Winstons Julia]

So, what’s Turner’s association with Hannity and Pat Buchanan?

I’ll admit I don’t know much about the guy. He sounds like a nut to me. Maybe not to other folks here, but he sounds like a nut to me.

[Yosemitest]

Meet ‘em at the door, with a loaded forty-four!

[Calpernia]

>>>So, what’s Turner’s association with Hannity and Pat Buchanan?

Very, very fair question. I would like to know too.

[BP2]

Regardless of how you feel about Hal Turner, this case could have repercussions for us all.

Brandenburg v. Ohio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
The U.S. Supreme Court stated that the government cannot constitutionally punish abstract advocacy of force or law violation.

The Eighth Amendment - Excessive Bail & Fines, Cruel & Unusual Punishment
http://peacesecurity.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_eighth_amendment_to_the_us_constitution#ixzz0JVHsZ9BN&C
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excessive_bail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excessive_bail#The_Eighth_Amendment

Overbreadth doctrine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overbreadth_doctrine

[April Lexington]

Violence is not the answer. Volence only begets more violence. Gandhi didn't use violence. Martin Luther King didn't use violence, Havl didn't use violence. Even the Soviet wall collapsed without real violence. Conservatives must win on ideas if the victory be sustainable.

[Springfield Reformer]

I know this thread is way old, but I leave this as a footnote for future readers: We’ve been punked ...

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A5GCC80&show_article=1

So Mr. Turner’s real job was, apparently, to blunt conservatism by deliberately drawing offsides the kook fringe psudo-conservatives, and that as a way to discredit or difuse any robust reaction among genuine conservatives against the mounting tyranny. I call these people pseudo-conservatives because principled conservatism is like a well-trained offensive line; we only respond after the ball is snapped, because we’re watching the ball, not listening to the count. These pseudo-conservatives don’t even know what the ball looks like, let alone how to watch it.