Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stunning new technology allows parents to hold a life-size model of their unborn child
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 26 June 2009

Posted on 06/26/2009 8:30:42 AM PDT by Lorianne

It's a defining moment in a parent's life: Seeing their unborn child's image on an ultrasound for the first time. Now pregnant women could have the chance to hold a life-size model of their unborn baby.

The startling new medical technology is the result of a Royal College of Art design student's PhD.

Brazilian student Jorge Lopes has pioneered the conversion of data from ultrasound and MRI scans into life-size plaster models of living embryos using a method called rapid prototyping.

'It’s amazing to see the faces of the mothers. They can see the full scale of their baby, really understand the size of it,' said Dr Lopes.

'The technology can be also be used as an emotional tool for parents whose foetus might be deformed or need treatment,' added Hilary French, who heads the School of Architecture and Design Products.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; science

1 posted on 06/26/2009 8:30:42 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Technology is on the side of pro life.


2 posted on 06/26/2009 8:35:06 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

We use that technology at work for making new components, molds, etc.

It’s quite amazing.


3 posted on 06/26/2009 8:36:33 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Eschew exclamatory abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Lorianne this is awesome. Technology has been such a great tool in the Pro-Life battle.


4 posted on 06/26/2009 8:38:12 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Sarah Palin 2012 (Who else in the GOP is man enough?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

Agreed. The pro-life groups need to bet the farm on this. Forget about political advertising, forget about lobbying, just put all the money into getting as many 3D and 4D ultrasound out there as possible and feeding the outputs to stereo lith companies to get the models made. No mother holding one of these in their hand is going to abort.


5 posted on 06/26/2009 8:39:54 AM PDT by MikeGranby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Wow! Amazing additional photos at the link!


6 posted on 06/26/2009 8:47:40 AM PDT by passionfruit (When illegals become legal, even they won't do the work Americans won't do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Wow, that is amazing!


7 posted on 06/26/2009 8:49:37 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Brazilian student Jorge Lopes has pioneered the conversion of data from ultrasound and MRI scans into life-size plaster models of living embryos using a method called rapid prototyping.

Ingenious application of existing technology.

8 posted on 06/26/2009 8:49:48 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Theology is the Queen Of The Sciences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeGranby

Can you imagine a pregnant mother taking a model of her unborn child to work and placing it on her desk like they do framed photos of their ultrasounds?

That would be so powerful for other people to see.

If she had several done over the course of her pregnancy, she could have the 3-D development of the baby proudly on display.

I bet you anything such dispays will become disallowed at workplaces in short order by those who don’t want to see the plain evidence.


9 posted on 06/26/2009 8:50:14 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

While it’s an impressive bit of technology, does anybody else find this to be a little... creepy?


10 posted on 06/26/2009 8:51:05 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Wow.

Way cool.


11 posted on 06/26/2009 8:54:12 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Looks like Gumby!


12 posted on 06/26/2009 8:54:46 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

That can be a really powerful pro-life tool. A lot of times the baby isn’t a baby, but just a word, “pregnant”. The instant I became pro-life instead of just ambivelant was when I saw the button of the teeny little feet. This nice lady in a park had it on and I asked what it was.


13 posted on 06/26/2009 9:04:12 AM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

Soon to be banned by the Federal Government


14 posted on 06/26/2009 9:04:41 AM PDT by montomike (Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montomike

LOL! Yes, for “emotional insensitivity”.


15 posted on 06/26/2009 9:48:43 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
This seems like a really good tool for people to see that this is not some "fetus", but rather a human baby in the momma's belly.

I think that it is great, as long as they do not add (Ernst Haeckel) gill slits to the baby perpetuating the lie that our evolutionary ancestors were fish.
16 posted on 06/26/2009 9:52:19 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Dr Lopes work is definitely "a ground-breaking new field of world importance."

How could a doctor or pregnant woman choose to abort a baby once they'd seen it like this?

17 posted on 06/26/2009 12:43:50 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"I bet you anything such dispays will become disallowed at workplaces in short order by those who don’t want to see the plain evidence."

That was my first thought. Of course, it won't be packaged that way. The pro-aborts will argue that it's insensitive to people who have suffered miscarriages, or that subjecting the unborn to needless ultrasound is somehow unhealthy...as if they really cared.

18 posted on 06/26/2009 12:47:50 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson