Skip to comments.
Documents Detail Case for Walpin's Dismissal
washingtonpost.com ^
| July 1 2009 (1 hour ago)
| Ed O'Keefe
Posted on 07/01/2009 4:42:17 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
From what I’ve heard, including from Walpin, himself, (on television)resignation was not a consideration for him. He rejected the ‘one hour notice’ and was fired, period.
And he’s not going quietly — a very brave thing for someone to stand up to Ol’ Evil Eye.
21
posted on
07/01/2009 5:38:24 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
To: UCANSEE2
22
posted on
07/01/2009 5:42:09 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
The WP can be counted on to defend the ‘Bama’s corrupt actions without any critical examination whatsoever. The MSM is tanking because everything they print and say is totally partisan and completely predictable. Who wants to listen to the same old tired mantra over and over?
23
posted on
07/01/2009 6:10:58 AM PDT
by
Spok
(Proud father of a Marine in the 1/1.)
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
=
24
posted on
07/01/2009 6:29:14 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”
- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals
25
posted on
07/01/2009 6:30:55 AM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Crisis - America Held Hostage)
To: Bubba_Leroy
sad... this country was duped from within.
To: Niteranger68
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
I think you have it right. If there were actual documentation aside from the collection of perjorative adjectives the WH tried, they'd have made it abundantly clear. The Post's use of the word "documents" seems an obvious ploy to create impressions of something substantive and legal when it's nothing of the sort. The WH put all the previous gossipy crap in a binder with a really nifty looking cover page, section headers and carefully chosen font. Voila. A document.
28
posted on
07/01/2009 6:42:38 AM PDT
by
Eroteme
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
I suppose watchdogs are always supposed to be on good terms with the watchees. Yeah, I’m sure that’ll work.
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
Does anyone know where the fake newsletter came from, who was behind it? The memos seem rather tame, nothing shocking, but the newsletter is odd - did Walprin allegedly have something to do with it?
30
posted on
07/01/2009 8:58:57 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
More WaPo smoke and mirrors...
31
posted on
07/01/2009 9:10:31 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
32
posted on
07/01/2009 9:56:22 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Eroteme
To: Cboldt
Thank you.
So, Michelle is ‘appointing’ Jackie to the senior adviser position. Sounds like a czarina to me.
34
posted on
07/02/2009 6:41:36 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson