Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Explains Palin's Exit
Women of the Web ^ | July 4, 2009 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/05/2009 10:17:12 PM PDT by SolidWood

I’m confused by all the confusion among the chattering classes about Palin. I thought her press conference explained it very clearly – though she couldn’t put it precisely this way without sounding vain, but it’s obvious.

Even though she’s just a state governor, she’s a HUGE national star who is both sought after and attacked as if she is already a president (a Bush, not an Obama). But she basically can’t participate because she’s tethered to the governor’s office up in Alaska. Consequently, she has to fight with one hand tied behind her back and she also can’t go around the country campaigning for candidates and principles she believes in – because she’s governor and would be accused of neglecting the state.

Meanwhile, the Lt. Gov. is a great guy, so she’s leaving the state in good hands and now she can go on to be an even bigger star.

It’s a weird Washington insider perspective to be perplexed by what she’s doing. Contrary to Mark Sanford’s e-mails to his mistress, no one was really impressed with him; 99.99999999999999999% of Americans didn’t know who he was. Who is more influential: Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge and Bill O’Reilly, or Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford (before the fall)? As Palin said, God bless people who run for political office, but – and she didn’t say this part – she’s too big to be a lame-duck governor stuck dealing with fishing licenses in Anchorage right now.

She’ll be much bigger now and can play on the national stage without constantly setting off state ethics investigations by loons, parasites and liberals. None of this applied to McCain or Kerry – both of whom went back to the Senate – because their national campaigns diminished them. Palin’s national campaign made her a major star. As she said, she’s not retreating, she’s advancing in another direction.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; gopimplosion; infiltrators; palin; palinresignation; sarahpalin; trolls; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-284 next last
To: voteNRA
Just found it a new tag and it went ZOT, oh well

Yeah, I saw that. Too bad. It was a good tag for he/she/it.

That one was long overdue for the zot, I think. It's posting history reads like a drug-crazed rant.

121 posted on 07/06/2009 12:12:05 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
He was a sleeper-troll, now banned.

I knew it! Looks like I haven't lost my old mod instincts after all ;-)

122 posted on 07/06/2009 12:14:43 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: grantinev; Lancey Howard; voteNRA; ncalburt; Windflier; toddausauras; lmr

FYI, our friend grantinev (since 2008-02-23) is history.

>>This account has been banned or suspended.

Don’t miss lmr’s comments on this poster in #118. This looks like it was a relatively recent troll account.


123 posted on 07/06/2009 12:15:39 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Oh, she is great! I loved her grit. I loved her genuine down to earth nature. I thought she was tough, and would never quit fighting for what is right. I believed that she would do everything it took to fight for conservative values, defend them and embody those values.

By quitting, she destroys those values. She crushes what I believed she stood for.

She validates her critics with this move.

If it is the “best thing for Alaska” that she quit being their (fishing license) leader; why would America think that it would be the best thing for the nation for her to be the leader of our national government?

Supporters need to be realistic, we need to be informed and never ever blindly follow politicians.


124 posted on 07/06/2009 12:19:52 AM PDT by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
FYI, our friend grantinev (since 2008-02-23) is history.

>>This account has been banned or suspended.

I'm very glad that I could help with that.

The comments that person made about Sarah Palin were so disgusting and wildly over the top, that I knew they couldn't be anything but a plant.

125 posted on 07/06/2009 12:22:38 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

>>I knew they couldn’t be anything but a plant.

That well sums up the IQ of that troll - plant-like.


126 posted on 07/06/2009 12:24:41 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
...as a Supreme Court Justice, she could annoy liberals for decades!

I do love the thought of that!

127 posted on 07/06/2009 12:27:25 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
That well sums up the IQ of that troll - plant-like.

LOL! Don't make me laugh like that again. I might wake up the family!

128 posted on 07/06/2009 12:29:37 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout

Do you understand that Palin was tethered to Alaska and getting bombarded with expensive, frivolous “ethics” complaints? And do you understand that she is now FREE to raise a gajillion dollars from mainland coast to mainland coast? And that by resigning now, the new guy (reportedly a conservative Republican) will get a tremendous leg up (as the incumbent) on getting elected to a full term in the next gubernatorial election?

And do you not see the complete tizzy the scumbags are in thanks to her announcement?

Get a grip.


129 posted on 07/06/2009 12:32:07 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

You have expressed much better than I, how I feel about this whole mess.

I was hoping that she would prove herself while in the governor’s office. That she would truly take this time to learn the craft of leadership, how to influence and argue her case effectively. I had expected her to emerge a stronger, smarter candidate in 2012, and silence her critics.

I see now, that this is not to be.


130 posted on 07/06/2009 12:34:55 AM PDT by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Pleasure. I was going to post something a little stronger to him/her/it, but then I would have to ban myself ;)


131 posted on 07/06/2009 12:35:24 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I was going to post something a little stronger to him/her/it, but then I would have to ban myself ;)

LOL! I understand the feeling!

Thanks again.

132 posted on 07/06/2009 12:38:59 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Welcome! :)


133 posted on 07/06/2009 12:39:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Do you not see that what you just described to me is a selfserving politician who puts her own ambitions ahead of her duty to serve out the term Alaskans elected her to serve? Do you not see that what you described is a person who puts finances ahead of duty? Self ahead of country?

And do you not see that the dems are giddy that she was done this?!

I think you and Sarah have over estimated her ‘star value’.


134 posted on 07/06/2009 12:42:08 AM PDT by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The crowds that come to see her, didn’t win the election for her the last time. They certainly won’t this time. Celebrity does not a leader make...just look at the president.

I suppose you think Kate Gosselin-—who draws huge crowds to her appearances, should be President?...well, okay truth be told, I would vote for Kate over Obama any day!


135 posted on 07/06/2009 12:46:52 AM PDT by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
If we can’t even clean up THIS house, how on earth are we ever going to clean up Congress?

I'm usually one of the most optimistic people on FR (at least judging by some of the posts I've seen over the past 4 years...) but I'm starting to doubt Congress can ever be cleaned up.

If by some miracle conservative Republicans regain power in the House, I have a nice long list of rules I'd like to see enacted:

I can keep going, but you get the idea.
136 posted on 07/06/2009 12:51:20 AM PDT by Terpfen (Ain't over yet, folks. Those 2004 Senate gains are up for grabs in 2 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"yet this is the same path, minus the resignation, taken by Ronald Reagan, that is, starting early, traveling the country to espouse a libertarian Republican message of limited government, a strong military, and a strong conservative Social Issues contract. "

Reagan lost the first run for President to Ford at the convention. He did not waver but spent four years gathering support for the next nomination.

Palin makes a name for the 2012 election. In 2016 she will be about, what, 53?

yitbos

137 posted on 07/06/2009 1:07:40 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout
I suppose you think Kate Gosselin-—who draws huge crowds to her appearances, should be President?...

???

Kate Gosselin...? Okay then, off to Google I go....

138 posted on 07/06/2009 1:09:09 AM PDT by Lancey Howard (I guess I'm out of the loop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

I really like what I’ve seen of Sarah Palin. The left vigorously hates her and that makes me feel warmer towards her, but I will be watching closely how the Republican party treats her. I don’t trust them after they gave us John McCain. The Republican party has been so seriously infiltrated that if she’s a strong conservative like I suspect she is, she won’t get ten feet from the door. The faux republicans will put her through the shredder just like the media does. After all they tried to marginalize her when McCain lost. So we’ll see.


139 posted on 07/06/2009 1:09:24 AM PDT by crissala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout

Give me a break, our elected thieves in Washington do it all the time, but with less nerve.

Look at the present squatter in the Whitehouse and the failed McCain who both wanted to be POTUS BUT still held their place as elected thieves in case their attempts fail, kind of like having their cake and eating it also.


140 posted on 07/06/2009 1:47:29 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson