Posted on 07/10/2009 7:31:24 PM PDT by pissant
hoax
Fellating Obama is yours?
Last ping of the day.
Something to reconsider.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama’s campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records.
.
A sociologist in Iowa using the name colmado_naranja says differently. She got 2 US Army grunts to go get certified copies of the BC in Kenya. This is going to be fun!
Waiting with bated breath.
Um, you’re a little behind on the news regarding the ‘colmado_naranja’ E-bay scams.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2289771/posts?page=27#27
is this what you are looking for?
My take on this: Cheney as the past President of the Senate was responsible for Obama NOT being properly vetted as a US natural born citizen/ineligible for the Presidency.
Cheney is about to get his just deserts, regarding the “Executive Assassination Ring.” This is gonna get ugly, but what goes around, comes around.
I thought the house certified.
OIC … all Cheney’s (Bushes) fault. Can’t wait to see how this plays out. Bush’s fault that Obama, the non American, is now president. LOL!
Talk about blaming the Bush administration for all that is happening, great job. Yea, I know … it is all Bushes fault.
Perhaps a little education on the job of VP in regard to the Senate:
The Vice President is the President of the US Senate. While he does not really control anything in the Senate, he is called on to be the tie-breaking vote if the Senate is deadlocked. They also oversee procedural issues and preside over impeachment trials, unless the person impeached is the President. In that case, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court oversees the trial. The VP is not usually to be found in everyday Senate meetings, instead allowing a senate-chosen President pro tempore to preside over usual proceedings.
1. On the one hand, President Obama sends a public letter to Kapiolani hospital in January 2009 in which he states that he was born there.
2. On the other hand, President Obama refuses to publicly acknowledge/verify that he even sent the letter.
3. Are my statements above correct? Thanks.
Hey, so do I! Had to make an emergency landing there once-upon-a-time. Got to look at some great, bi-plane cropdusters there ..................... FRegards
*****
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what was put to rest in '61?
Just wondering: On Obama's former fight the smears site, which is suddenly no longer available for some reason, Obama's birth certificate is stamped with the date of June 2007.
Why is that?
1. That is, why didn't Obama post a copy of a birth certificate with a stamped date of 1961, the year you mention above, and the year Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii?
2. Did then Senator Obama order a new Hawaii birth certificate in 2007 because he somehow lost his birth certificate that is stamped with the year 1961 on the back?
3. And what happened to the birth certificate Obama mentions in one of his book? Did he lose it, and that is the reason he ordered a new birth certificate in June 2007?
4. I don't know about you, but the only time most people send away for a new birth certificate is when they lose one.
5. Myself, I don't know anyone who has TWO official copies of their birth certificates.
Be SURE to read the latest, and read the entire thing. This thing stinks to high heaven.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2290182/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.