[NoobRep]

The story the MSM will NOT cover.

[libbylu]

I bet he has his choice of the best lawyers.

[CodeToad]

BTTT

[taxtruth]

I sure hope the man wins and sues the pants off the government and exposes the whole gang.

[cripplecreek]

Socialized health care will take care of him soon enough.

[jazminerose]

Is there a fund?

[Daisyjane69]

Paging:

FReeper: holdonnow (Mark Levin)

[God luvs America]

nor will the GOP who should carry this torch the way the rats carried plame on thier shoulders for three years...

[KansasGirl]

Good for him!! Isn’t he a Democrat?

[Army Air Corps]

Ping.

[Iron Munro]

Obama has his best people out gathering evidence.

[Oldpuppymax]

I’m sure this will be heavily featured on CNN!

[cranked]

Good for him.

If Holder is not going to uphold the laws of this land, perhaps by investigating Barry’s illegal firing of this IG, then perhaps a trial lawyer and judge can do what is not.

[pray4liberty]

Since when did Obama care about the law. He can’t even produce a valid birth certificate.

[krogers58]

I do know that the firing generated quite a bit of interest over at the FBI, and they have opened an investigation into all of Walpin’s claims. Ironic that this had only been a civil matter, but now has progressed into a criminal investigation.

[theFIRMbss]

I don't know this blog,
but after looking around,
this seem to sum it:

--------------------------------------------------

Short version: Walpin was investigating Obama crony’s involvement in an AmeriCorps-related scandal involving misappropriation of funding. Case was settled, to the mild detriment of crony*. Walpin disagreed with settlement. Complaint made against him. So far, this is all he-said, he-said.

Then the White House tried to force out Walpin; Walpin, well aware of his rights, made them go through the process. At this point, Senator Charles Grassley - Republican - stepped in, as IG issues are one of his interests. Grassley would also like to know if the First Lady’s office is involved in this somehow, given that her CoS is going over to run the Corporation for National and Community Service, who Walpin was also responsible for oversight over. Meanwhile, Senator Claire McCaskill - Democrat - has also stepped in, as she too is usually associated with IG protection. That makes this officially a matter of bipartisan concern, which means that the White House of course is doing everything it can to address said concerns seriously.

I’m kidding, of course. No, what the White House is actually doing, of course, is trying to imply that Walpin’s senile:

WASHINGTON — Responding to criticism from a Senate Democratic ally, President Obama explained why he fired the Inspector General of the AmeriCorps without the 30-day notification required by law, calling Gerald Walpin so “confused” and “disoriented” that there was reason to question “his capacity to serve.”

As Ed Morrissey noted, believing that this was the White House’s primary motive requires that you believe that the administration’s instinctive, immediate reaction to seeing an employee come down with a debilitating disease is to fire them. Yes. That is precisely the thing that one does when one wishes to maintain a reputation for empathy and tolerance. I can’t say that I have as much difficulty as Michelle Malkin reconciling the allegation of Walpin’s mental diminished capacity with his public appearances (see the video above), mostly because neither I nor Ms. Malkin can take it at all seriously…

Moe Lane - Let us recap the Gerald Walpin situation.

[Girlene]

Good! A bit more from Washington Times, Fired inspector general files lawsuit

.........."He also said in its haste to dump him, the administration never interviewed him or any of his staff - an omission Mr. Walpin said in his lawsuit violates a 2008 law meant to protect government watchdogs.

The law requires that Congress be notified 30 days before an inspector general is dismissed, and Mr. Walpin contends that the administration has yet to meet the requirements for who should be notified and what reasons must be given.".....................

............."Though it's not part of the suit, Mr. Walpin's lawyers said in their legal brief that the case "raises serious questions of age discrimination" because of the accusations that Mr. Walpin, who is in his late 70s, seemed unable to function. ".................

[SweetCaroline]

*

[markedmannerf]

God bless this man

[DontTreadOnMe2009]

Walpin ... rip ‘em a new one!

[Doogle]