Posted on 07/24/2009 11:27:38 AM PDT by Steelfish
My post should have been addressed to dmz
_______
but wasn’t and neither was this one. That’s OK, I sure you were just too busy calculating which type of child molester is more whacked to remember to ping me.
Seriously, though, my apologies if I was overly harsh in my comments. Your words struck me immediately as just being wrong. But you are entirely correct, you don’t have to justify your opinions to anyone.
For my own money, though, I don’t have 2 buckets for child molesters, one bucket for the hetero variety and another for the homosexual variety. They are equally despicable from where I sit.
Can you really imagine God looking at 2 child molesters and thinking that he would go easier on the one who at least had the decency to rape a child of the opposite sex? I can’t.
As for your preference about your own kids ... that’s on you. Too weird to comment on.
Whomever suggested that a screwing underage girls is somehow a "better" sin that screwing underage boys dwells in another world.
I believe the rape of a child would be traumatic and confusing on many levels, and having it be by someone of the same sex would just add one more area of confusion.
I've known homosexuals who blamed their sexual orientation, (and "blamed" is the right word), on having been raped by an uncle or other adult when they were little boys.
But then, I'm sure this is way over your head, so let's just drop it.
But then, I’m sure this is way over your head, so let’s just drop it.
___
sad that legitimate disagreements need to end with questions of intelligence
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.