Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officers Run Background Check On Obama; Placed On Leave
CNN ^

Posted on 07/30/2009 5:00:58 AM PDT by tatsinfla

DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. -- Two DeKalb County police officers have been placed on paid administrative leave after an investigation revealed they ran a background check on President Barack Obama.

A representative for the DeKalb County CEO’s office identified the officers as Ryan White and C.M. Route.

Officials said Obama’s name was typed into a computer inside a DeKalb County police car on July 20 and ran through the National Crime Information Center.

The secret service was immediately notified and contacted the DeKalb County Police Department.

A representative said both officers have been with the department less than five years.

A representative said one of the officers denied involvement.

An official investigation is being conducted by the DeKalb County Police Department’s Internal Affairs division.

It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; crime; fraud; kenya; kenyan; leo; naturalborn; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; secretservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
i apologize ahead of time if this has been posted previous...its early...good morning folks...
1 posted on 07/30/2009 5:00:58 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.


Yup, that’s a real headscratcher right there.


2 posted on 07/30/2009 5:02:35 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

What did the check show???


3 posted on 07/30/2009 5:03:08 AM PDT by chadwimc (Proud to be an infidel ! Allah fubar !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Background check on “Barak Obama” turns up nothing. No surprise here. “Barak Obama” is probably a pseudonym.


4 posted on 07/30/2009 5:03:16 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
..doing the job the MSM refuses to do.
5 posted on 07/30/2009 5:03:25 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

As they say in those parts... “WELL BLESS THEIR HEARTS” :)


6 posted on 07/30/2009 5:04:04 AM PDT by MrDem (From Morning in America to Mourning in America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
identified the officers as Ryan White


7 posted on 07/30/2009 5:06:00 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc

Punahou school records
Occidental College records
Columbia University records
Columbia thesis
Harvard Law School records
Harvard Law Review articles
scholarly articles from the University of Chicago
passport
medical records
files from his years as an Illinois state senator
Illinois State Bar Association records
baptism records, if any
adoption records


8 posted on 07/30/2009 5:06:44 AM PDT by roses of sharon (It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

..."see I'm clean"...honkey

9 posted on 07/30/2009 5:07:25 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

They should have probably checked under “Barry Soetoro”.


10 posted on 07/30/2009 5:07:37 AM PDT by 2harddrive (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

The officers are morons. Certain names are flagged, so if they’re run, it sets off all sorts of alerts.


11 posted on 07/30/2009 5:07:44 AM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; LucyT

Wow. Not sure if these guys are going to be employed much longer..


12 posted on 07/30/2009 5:08:04 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

13 posted on 07/30/2009 5:08:33 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Achtung. preparen zie fur die obamahopenchangen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

“It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.”

Gee. Maybe they’re PATRIOTS?

Glad to see they’re on PAID leave for this. I usually don’t approve of wasting taxpayer dollars, but I’ll make an exception in this case.

Think 0bama will invite them over for a beer when they’er found innocent of all charges?

These things wouldn’t happen and citizens wouldn’t be upset if the ‘Usurper in Chief’ would just provide his d@mn long-form birth certificate!


14 posted on 07/30/2009 5:09:00 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
“It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.”

Duuh!?! The next logical question everyone wants to know is, What did the check reveal? Inquiring minds want to know... And, what law is there that says you can't run a criminal background check on the prez??? Another, Inquiring minds question...

15 posted on 07/30/2009 5:10:03 AM PDT by opaque soul (Condensing gas to solid state, truth the soul does make opaque.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Obama will be covering his tracks through out the country but sooner or later something will surface.


16 posted on 07/30/2009 5:10:52 AM PDT by taxtruth (America is a ping pong game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
What did the check show???

Hopefully it showed at least SOME of what's on my FR Home page.

http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/

17 posted on 07/30/2009 5:11:50 AM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Yes, it would be interesting to know exactly what they found.

I wonder if these two officers will get the same sympathy as the kid who hacked Palin’s email account or the couple who recorded Jim McDermott’s phone conversation with Newt Gingrich?


18 posted on 07/30/2009 5:13:19 AM PDT by NeoConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Interesting that the Secret Service were called. Why? Is that a formal procedure written into the use of running background checks?


19 posted on 07/30/2009 5:15:12 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
"What did the check show???"

Maybe after a bit more free fall of O's approval numbers, one of his loyal gatekeepers (thugs) will get curious and take a peek at some of the hidden records.

20 posted on 07/30/2009 5:15:21 AM PDT by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Give these cops a medal, now.


21 posted on 07/30/2009 5:19:36 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Is it illegal to do a background check on an elected official? Or were they put on leave because they used “company resources” to do so? Just wondering was this a legal issue or did they tag it as a security issue, or just a case of them using background check software when they weren’t authorized to do so? I’ve never run a background check, but know there are sites online that do that kind of thing for a fee...legally, do you have to have a person’s permission to run a background check on them? I know at our church they run background checks on all volunteers that work with children, but that is by signed consent. Never thought much about the legal ramifications, but obviously for these police officers it was a “no no” , I’m just wondering why.


22 posted on 07/30/2009 5:21:01 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.

Unlear only to the SRM.

23 posted on 07/30/2009 5:22:19 AM PDT by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opaque soul

i do know from a friend that works for the state law enforcement agency here florida that you can not just run (on the agency’s system) a background check without authorization just for the sake of doing it....it would be grounds for dismissal....i wonder what they would do though (the secret service) if you were a private citizen and paid to run one on an internet program....would be interesting to see how quick they came a knocking....


24 posted on 07/30/2009 5:23:28 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

They could learn alot of information by reading Obama’s book where he admits recreational drug use.

I applaud these officers. It’s well documented that Obama might have committed fraud and perjury in claiming to be a natural born citizen.


25 posted on 07/30/2009 5:25:30 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

There may be something in the job app or contract they signed upon employment that says that you cannot look up someone you aren’t arresting or such. I’ve worked in Human Resources and you can’t go rifling through personnel files.


26 posted on 07/30/2009 5:26:03 AM PDT by Calm_Cool_and_Elected (Who is John Thompson?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

see my post #24


27 posted on 07/30/2009 5:26:07 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected

It would also be for each employee’s protection of privacy. You wouldn’t want someone blabbing your personal info to everyone at work, would you?


28 posted on 07/30/2009 5:27:34 AM PDT by Calm_Cool_and_Elected (Who is John Thompson?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Especially if they had a couple of thousand doors they had to knock on. That would tie the Secret Service up for quite some time. They might have to sub the work out.


29 posted on 07/30/2009 5:28:08 AM PDT by meatloaf (Obama, Obozo ... what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.

Thank God somebody attempted!

30 posted on 07/30/2009 5:36:41 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
And he is not hiding his Africa birth. /sarcasm
31 posted on 07/30/2009 5:38:47 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Obama's lies make Bill Clinton's lie small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

LOL!


32 posted on 07/30/2009 5:41:49 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Hello Diana in Wisconsin,
You know this poser will release his birth info about the same time John Kerry releases his military file.


33 posted on 07/30/2009 5:43:02 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
How about this one?

Barry, who's your Daddy?

Here's a fun thing to do if you have a few minutes. Do a Google for "Frank Marshall Davis" and "Frank Marshal Davis". He's reportedly Zer0's actual father. When will this stuff stop?

Mommy has some interesting pictures, too.

Watch this interesting video by clicking HERE.

34 posted on 07/30/2009 5:48:27 AM PDT by jws3sticks (Sarah Palin forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

They should be given commendations.


35 posted on 07/30/2009 5:50:39 AM PDT by Jedidah ("Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

So these policemen get placed on leave for doing a background check on Obama..yet the CEO of the company that accessed(and possibly tampered with) Obama’s passport while contracted with the State Department during the primaries gets picked to be in the Obama Administration. It was this passport breach that started the whole refusal of Obama to release his long form birth certificate.

Go figure.


36 posted on 07/30/2009 5:53:04 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoConfederate
"I wonder if these two officers will get the same sympathy as the kid who hacked Palin’s email account or the couple who recorded Jim McDermott’s phone conversation with Newt Gingrich?"

Or they will get the same sympathy as the 24 year old that hacked into his passport information and was later found dead!

Wonder what would happen if all our law enforcers ran a background check on the pres? Would they put them all on leave - that would be quite a pickle!
37 posted on 07/30/2009 6:02:11 AM PDT by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected

Joe The Plumber comes to mind.............Wasn’t LE ,some ditz in a state office IIRC.


38 posted on 07/30/2009 6:02:28 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

So many secrets and lies from the Left. How can they ever keep their stories straight? ;)

I can’t believe there hasn’t been anyone other than a discredited ‘gay luv-ah’ to try to ‘swiftboat’ this guy! Grrrrr!

Well, the media probably gets 10 calls a day from people who know the truth, but they’re not answering, LOL!


39 posted on 07/30/2009 6:03:14 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla
It is unclear why the officers ran a check on the president.

Maybe they were just goofing around. "Let's see what this baby can do." Maybe they also typed in "Godzilla" or "Santa Claus."

40 posted on 07/30/2009 6:06:46 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoConfederate

Jim McDermott? You mean John Boehner. McDermott was the Dem congresscritter who received the illegal tapes.

Go straight to the coffee pot. Do not pass “Go”. Do not collect $200.


41 posted on 07/30/2009 6:08:07 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

“Hold muh beer and watch this” moment of the week.


42 posted on 07/30/2009 6:22:11 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

NCIC checks are different than the checks one can run online from pricate companies. It is strictly for law enforcement purposes,

ACCESS CONSTRAINTS: All records in NCIC are protected from unauthorized access through appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. These safeguards include restricting access to those with a need to know to perform their official duties, and using locks, alarm devices, passwords, and/or encrypting data communications.

http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fbi/is/ncic.htm


43 posted on 07/30/2009 6:28:29 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CASchack

They may be flagged but I still don’t understand what crime was committed by the officers.


44 posted on 07/30/2009 6:31:12 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

Did they find Obama’s alleged 39 Social Security numbers?


45 posted on 07/30/2009 6:58:07 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Uh oh ... I would say not.


46 posted on 07/30/2009 7:59:57 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

~~PING!


47 posted on 07/30/2009 8:06:47 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; STARWISE

So how difficult would it be for a PI to get the information?


48 posted on 07/30/2009 8:10:06 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Remember a couple of folks have done that?
Ed Hale for one. That’s how the Obama
divorce documents surfaced.


49 posted on 07/30/2009 8:13:34 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The ones showing that LOLO was BOs daddy?


50 posted on 07/30/2009 8:16:24 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson