Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONFIRMATION HEARINGS SHOULD BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306056/posts?page=44 ^

Posted on 08/02/2009 11:36:51 AM PDT by GoreNoMore

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: GoreNoMore
I'm going to post this so that EVERYONE who thinks we are powerless to do something about this understands how best to go about it. We need to find the legal remedy enabling us to charge our representatives with disobeying their oaths of office and start removing them one by one. Here is the case.

Exhibit A, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:

" ”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19

TITLE 3--THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES

Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act

”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “

Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:

” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Exhibit D: The Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877:

The process currently provides that someone “challenge” the electoral votes during a short, specified time frame while the Electoral College votes are opened and tabulated. This process does not cover challenges to "eligibility" qualifications. In fact, if this act pretends to do so in the manner in which it prescribes, it is unconstitutional. Any act of this sort that does not require that qualifications be presented by the President elect serves to undercut the provisions in the Constitution itself. No act that does not support the Constitution is constitutional. In order to change the requirements of the Twentieth amendment, one would need to pass another amendment. An “Act” doesn’t cut the mustard.

The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.

There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. In fact, without establishing whether or not the President elect is "qualified", Congress would not know whether or not to step in and name a temporary replacement as the Amendment requires. Certainly, this means that the proof of "qualifications" must be presented to Congress.

If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?

If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.

Based upon the above, I conclude that:

1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms "The President elect shall have failed to qualify" clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.

2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has "standing" and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to "support" the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.

3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.

21 posted on 08/02/2009 1:09:53 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
Thank you for this post. I'm emailing it on. People need to realize that this war is about MONEY. We generate the money and keep them in place to hold order. If they have corrupted the order, we better have the strength to finish their game, join together. You do not have the muscle power to overcome them, but you control the archile’s heel, their money and resources. Get your head around that, YOU HAVE THEIR POWER and it really is time for people to use that power.
22 posted on 08/02/2009 1:40:09 PM PDT by GoreNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

That post is really worth looking at.

We need to work together and send to the military, these guys use their life to defend us and they deserve us doing our part.


23 posted on 08/02/2009 1:53:09 PM PDT by GoreNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All; GoreNoMore

Related thread:

Andrew Sullivan: Back To Square One [Andrew Sullivan, Semi-Birther?]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2305794/posts


24 posted on 08/02/2009 2:36:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (If we're an Empire, why are Cuba, Iraq, Philippines, Japan & Germany independent?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoreNoMore

ping


25 posted on 08/02/2009 3:26:52 PM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

>>>The end of the Democratic party for sure.

Please.

The idiots that voted for 0bummer, the same ones that can’t see that the country as we knew it is about to die, certainly don’t give a crap where the clown in the oval office was born.

This whole issue is like pissing in the wind and saying “My, what a nice warm shower.”.


26 posted on 08/02/2009 3:37:45 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (ESPN MNF: 3 Putzes talking about football on TV while I'm trying to watch a game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

I personally lay blame at the feet of the corrupt media.


27 posted on 08/02/2009 4:13:01 PM PDT by GoreNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: texican01

when local Committee’s for Public Safety brought out the ropes with thirteen loops above the noose!

Someone FINALLY gets it! HANG THEM FOR TREASON.... When will the trials start?


28 posted on 08/02/2009 5:23:36 PM PDT by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of history will repeat, repeat and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson