Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s pattern of intolerance toward dissent
SF Examiner ^ | 8/8/2009 | Timothy P. Carney

Posted on 08/07/2009 5:13:55 AM PDT by markomalley

Dissent, it turns out, is no longer patriotic. President Barack Obama’s White House and his Democratic National Committee have unleashed an all-out assault on what they call “angry,” “manufactured” and “lobbyist-funded” lies about health care reform. Look closely and you realize that’s how they classify all dissent.

Obama, when speaking at Notre Dame University last spring amid anti-abortion protests, said, “When we open up our hearts and our minds to those who may not think precisely like we do or believe precisely what we believe, that’s when we discover at least the possibility of common ground.”

But his record of dealing with actual dissent paints a different picture, one that suggests he has so much faith in his own good intentions and clever plans — and so little skepticism about the power of government to do good — that he sees all disagreement with his policies as condemnable.

“David Freddoso has made a career off dishonest, extreme hatemongering,” Obama’s presidential campaign wrote about my friend and now Examiner colleague David Freddoso last September in an effort to get a radio host to drop him.

The campaign e-mail called Freddoso a “card-carrying member of the right-wing smear machine” and said his anti-Obama book (for which I was the editor) contained “lies and smears about Barack Obama.”

The one “lie” the campaign claimed to find in the book turned out to be completely correct — that Obama “voted to raise your [taxes] if your taxable income is greater than $32,500 a year.” The Factcheck.org page the campaign cited actually proved Freddoso correct. The other “lies” they attacked were differences of interpretation.

The personal attack on Freddoso, filled with slurs and devoid of factual critiques, illuminates Obama’s current crusade against the “mobs,” “fishy e-mails” and “manufactured” dissent against his plan for massive regulations, subsidies and new government programs in the health care industry.

The White House does have a point here: Some of the protests these days are out of line. Shouting down Congress members at town halls is not practicing democracy, it’s bullying. Claiming, contrary to all evidence, that Obama is not an American citizen is not debate, but close-minded inanity — inanity possibly stemming from racism.

But Obama, through his White House, his campaign and his DNC, has lumped all dissenters in with the shouters and the birthers. There’s a political gain to this tactic, to be sure, but it certainly doesn’t reflect the open-mindedness and fairness Obama was supposed to bring.

Linda Douglass, communications director for Obama’s Office of Health Reform, said her job includes collecting “disinformation” about health care, and the White House asked Americans, “If you get an e-mail or see something on the Web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.”

What counts as “fishy”? Is it only the e-mails falsely claiming “reform” mandates euthanasia, or is Obama also counting as “disinformation” the videos displaying his past advocacy of a single-payer plan and arguments that the plan amounts to taxpayer funding of abortions?

Obama’s attack on Matt Drudge for posting those videos, the White House’s broad dismissal of town-hall protests as “mobs” of “manufactured” dissent and his DNC’s intentional conflation of health care protesters with birthers suggests that anything rejecting the White House’s conclusions on health care counts as “fishy,” or worse, and must be reported to authorities.

Obama’s White House and his DNC have repeatedly said “special interests” oppose reform because they “profit from the status quo.” (Obama doesn’t name anyone, because, awkwardly, the drugmakers and health insurers are lobbying for “reform” and buying television ads supporting the general idea.)

But has Obama ever acknowledged that most of the people who oppose his proposed reform do so because they believe it economically harmful, wasteful, unconstitutional, immoral or damaging to families?

The DNC suggests that all town-hall dissidents are “funded by K Street lobbyists.” This is an odd line of attack coming from the DNC, considering the DNC and its House and Senate campaign committees have already brought in more than $1 million from lobbyists and $629,000 from the drug industry.

One could fairly call Obama’s DNC a special-interest group funded by K Street lobbyists advancing policies for political gain that profit drugmakers and insurers — but that might be deemed “fishy.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aads; agenda; angrymob; bho44; bhofascism; bhohealthcare; bhotyranny; democratcongress; democrats; dissentispatriotic; dnc; goonsquad; obama; obamacare; snitches; townhalls; unionthugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2009 5:13:55 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The Joker wants to rule, not govern.

Enslaved by debt so high it can never be repaid. Economic freedom is freedom itself.


2 posted on 08/07/2009 5:15:39 AM PDT by Tarpon (The Joker's plan -- Slavery by debt so large it can never be repaid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Big Brother is watching


3 posted on 08/07/2009 5:17:36 AM PDT by Walrus (My congressman is toast in 2010 --- how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Dictators, don’t like dissent.


4 posted on 08/07/2009 5:18:27 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (FUBO Kenyan Usurper Thug - DON'T TREAD ON ME!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obama doesn’t want a fair debate.

He doesn’t even want an unfair debate.

He wants to shove his mind down your throat.


5 posted on 08/07/2009 5:18:42 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Claiming, contrary to all evidence, that Obama is not an American citizen is not debate, but close-minded inanity — inanity possibly stemming from racism. “

Had me until right there.

You can disagree that I want to see proof of eligibility, but to throw the racist card in there is over the line.


6 posted on 08/07/2009 5:19:26 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Narcissistic people do not respond well to ridicule,irony or sarcasm.


7 posted on 08/07/2009 5:20:41 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

...I expect Rush will be off the air within a year....they simply cannot allow him to continue.


8 posted on 08/07/2009 5:21:11 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
that Obama is not an American citizen

Nobody is claiming that Obama is not an American citizen. Nobody.

Typical misdirection by the Dems.

9 posted on 08/07/2009 5:21:37 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A good article but he has to get a dig in at those who are convinced Obama is not eligible to be president. Carney hints that we are inspired by racism. Can someone get to this guy and tell him a sop to the MSM meme won’t win favor with them for him and it does terrible damage to a lot of honest citizens who otherwise agree with him. Freddoso ought to lean on this guy.


10 posted on 08/07/2009 5:21:48 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Now I know why ammo costs so damn much.


11 posted on 08/07/2009 5:22:42 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Is this truly from the SAN FRANCISCO examiner?! I thought it was a lot cooler when I walked the dog this morning: Hell is freezing over.


12 posted on 08/07/2009 5:23:19 AM PDT by Wife of D28Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Fair debate” and “fair elections”

are not how he came to power.

In all his previous elections, he got the media to unseal records on his opponents in order to clear the field, essentially leaving no opponent to run against.


13 posted on 08/07/2009 5:24:50 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

Gosh, the America patriots are sitting on a PILE of guns and ammo,

have lines in the sand drawn all around them,

and are just waiting for someone to cross one of them.

Taking Rush off the air would be a big loud shout of “IT’S ON!”


14 posted on 08/07/2009 5:26:11 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Shouting down Congress members at town halls is not practicing democracy”?
Nonsense it is democracy at its purest.
Many congress crooks refuse to follow the wishes of their majority constituents.
Many refuse to even listen and block ANY dissent.

It is the only thing that worked in 2000 in West Palm Beach at the Board of county supervisors mangleing of the Bush Gore election.


15 posted on 08/07/2009 5:26:42 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (google; operation garden spot and REX84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

Players of the race card MUST be mocked and ridiculed.


16 posted on 08/07/2009 5:26:43 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
"The Joker wants to rule, not govern."

W was "The Decider", Zer0 is "The Teller".

17 posted on 08/07/2009 5:27:15 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

They are simply calling the congressbastards on their lies when they spout them.

I guess, to a congressbastard, this is unexpected.


18 posted on 08/07/2009 5:27:33 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Claiming, contrary to all evidence, that Obama is not an American citizen is not debate, but close-minded inanity
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Really? So?...Where's the evidence? We would like to see it.

When did it become “racist” to ask, “Please release your long form birth certificate, and all other documents related to natural born citizenship?”

Also...I believe this very smart author is deliberately lying. It isn't about citizenship. It is about **natural born** status.

19 posted on 08/07/2009 5:28:06 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You know this is real bad when it comes from the SF Examiner of all papers..


20 posted on 08/07/2009 5:28:56 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson