Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No New Calif. Textbooks Until 2016
UPI ^ | Aug. 8

Posted on 08/08/2009 9:56:45 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Budget cuts will force the California Board of Education to delay buying new textbooks until January 2016 at the earliest, officials say.

A state budget that closed a $24 billion deficit last month dramatically reduced state spending for kindergarten through eighth-grade textbooks, and a result most school districts are also putting off buying new high school textbooks, the Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.

California has also moved to allow funds that were supposed to be solely for textbooks to be diverted to other uses -- an amount that totals $334 million this year. The Times said administrators contend that flexibility is essential for dealing effectively with the budget crisis, but at least one state official disagrees.

"We need modern, state-of-the-art textbooks, not outdated, antiquated textbooks," Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell told the newspaper. "It could be close to a generation before we see new textbooks."

"There is no really good decision," added California Teachers Association President David Sanchez.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: arth; california; education; iou; nea; textbooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Oh, no! Children will go unindoctrinated!
1 posted on 08/08/2009 9:56:46 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Where did all the money spent on education go?

Seriously, government should get out of education completely and let parents pay for it themselves.

2 posted on 08/08/2009 9:57:47 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like it buys them time to publish new text books. If you get my drift.....


3 posted on 08/08/2009 9:58:21 AM PDT by pennyfarmer (Your Socialist Beat our Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good by then we will be able to go back to Math Science English and other valuable lessons. Social Studies programs should be outlawed and left to the parents. Of course this will put many Communists out of work but we can offer free plane tickets to Cuba and Venezuela where they can become truley useful idiots picking sugar cane.


4 posted on 08/08/2009 10:00:42 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Social Studies programs should be outlawed and left to the parents.

Or the schools could just return to teaching American history and civics by the people, places, and dates. When I learned such things in middle and high school at the turn of the millennium, we had to memorize and recite documents such as the Preamble to the Constitution and the Gettysburg Address, and my high school civics teacher taught us landmark Supreme Court cases and encouraged us to participate in American self-governance by being informed citizens and actively voting.

Wait, I went to school in Virginia, not California.

5 posted on 08/08/2009 10:07:32 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

lol!

I am sure Bill Gates or someone will donate history, science, math and other books, all with Obama on the cover I would bet


6 posted on 08/08/2009 10:10:26 AM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Social Studies programs should be outlawed and left to the parents.

Social Studies are very vital part of education. We should require those studies of the evils of communism over the decades. I still remember that our textbook in middle school on communism was bright red. It can't be left to the parents because most parents are totally ignorant of the forces of communism at work today.

7 posted on 08/08/2009 10:11:11 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Unfortunatly all teachers who have that kbnowledge are dead or retired. It has not been taught in college for years. Better to eliminate it until new teachers can be trained. Besides it will take full time to teach the kids to read write and add.


8 posted on 08/08/2009 10:11:28 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder what The Other State that drives the textbook industry (Texas) is going to do?


9 posted on 08/08/2009 10:11:55 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; screaminsunshine
We should require those studies of the evils of communism over the decades.

Actually, I think that basic micro-economics ought to be included as a component of the secondary school curriculum, alongside U.S. and world geography.

10 posted on 08/08/2009 10:15:22 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is great. At least the text books are safe from becoming even more liberal for a few more years.
11 posted on 08/08/2009 10:18:54 AM PDT by crunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"We need modern, state-of-the-art textbooks, not outdated, antiquated textbooks,"

Why? What cutting edge information are kids learning in grade school? Anymore, the state has difficulty producing young people who are minimally literate - let alone on the bleeding edge of learning.

12 posted on 08/08/2009 10:18:59 AM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Good idea. There may be some teachers left with the knowledge of addition and subtraction who could take on the task.


13 posted on 08/08/2009 10:23:12 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Holy cow, they’ll go through the entire Obama presidency without his halo-ed photo in their textbooks?!

Seriesly, though. How many behind-the-scenes bureaucrats did it take to analyze that decision?

California’s state payroll added 48 jobs a day every day FOR AN ENTIRE DECADE! (That’s “every day” as in 365 days a year!) Even this past year, with their woebegone budget, they managed to ADD 3,600 public workers.
http://weblog.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/afb/archives/035353.html

They’re like kudzu!


14 posted on 08/08/2009 10:24:14 AM PDT by Timeout (Brits have the royals. Russia, the Nomenklatura. WE have our privileged "public servant" class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Seriously, as a former teacher, I can say that most textbook updates are unnecessary and often produced worse books. But the textbook companies are part and parcel of the public school monopoly, and they expect a fresh cash infusion every five years. This California thing is going to hurt them, because California and Texas provide most of their profit.


15 posted on 08/08/2009 10:24:25 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

Yes, indeed. The ratio of managers to classroom teachers in the public school is 1:10. This is higher than the ration of officers to enlisted in the armed forces. Furthermore, there are about 10,000 schools districts in the United States, most of whom are headed by superintendents who are paid higher salaries than general officers.


16 posted on 08/08/2009 10:28:54 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
California has also moved to allow funds that were supposed to be solely for textbooks to be diverted to other uses — an amount that totals $334 million this year.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Another reason to homeschool!

This is more proof that government schools can not be reformed. Not enough money to buy textbooks? Unbelievable! These people are completely incompetent and shouldn't be left alone around children. Where are their priorities?

17 posted on 08/08/2009 10:29:26 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Post #17 was for you.

Another reason to homeschool.

18 posted on 08/08/2009 10:30:17 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I remember the 12th grade in Bama so well. They handed me a math book that was nine years old. Then they gave me a English literature book that was 24 years old. Finally...the American civics book? It was fourteen years old.

I look at my son over the past ten years...none of his books were more than three years old.


19 posted on 08/08/2009 10:30:25 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hey, I am using books for my 3rd grader that my college grad son used. Then again, as a homeschooler, I don’t get $6600 per kid per year. I spend about $500 a year on books and materials. For up to four students at a time.

Usually, I get the bulk of what I need from EBay and other homeschool auction sites.

It can be done.


20 posted on 08/08/2009 10:36:33 AM PDT by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson