Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STOP THE STIMULUS! 90% HASN'T BEEN SPENT. LET'S KEEP IT THAT WAY.
NY Post ^ | August 9, 2009 | Casey B. Mulligan

Posted on 08/09/2009 2:42:15 AM PDT by Scanian

In February, the President signed a "fiscal stimulus law" to supposedly "create or save" millions of jobs. If executed according to plan, the bill will cost $789 billion, or about $2,600 for every American, and this does not even count the extra economic harm when our government levies the taxes to pay for it. Fortunately, almost 90% of the government spending planned by the law has not yet occurred -- which means that it can, and should, be stopped.

The economy has been in bad shape. Employment has fallen for a year and a half now. Real GDP has dropped four straight quarters. Many statistics show the obvious -- that this recession is worse than those in recent memory.

But the spending of our political leaders -- including the $700 billion bank bailout and the $789 billion stimulus -- is totally out of proportion, not to mention counterproductive.

Over the past four quarters, real GDP has been $655 less per person than it was in 2007. That's a lot by comparison to previous recessions, but it makes no sense to spend thousands per person to attempt to partially fix a few hundred dollar decline.

Even if the Obama Administration were right that the stimulus law would "create or save" three to four million jobs, that means each job costs the Treasury $215,000! The best case scenario for the stimulus law gives us results that are miniscule compared with the costs. In the worst case scenario, we actually pay money to further harm an already struggling economy.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoeconomy; bhostimulus; deficitspending; economy; jobs; obama; recession; spending; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2009 2:42:16 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

But next year is an election year. Don’t you want the incumbents to spend their way to victory?


2 posted on 08/09/2009 2:59:11 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I had this same thought sitting at my desk this morning - then I saw this headline in the Post.

It is a good point....if the money is unspent -— leave it that way.


3 posted on 08/09/2009 3:14:01 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I think it’s time we quit calling it a “Stimulus” and start calling it what it actually is, the “Democratic Pet Projects Fund”.


4 posted on 08/09/2009 3:27:06 AM PDT by Clink (The more you complain, the longer God lets you live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clink

Agreed, FRiend. Personally, I’ve been referring to it all as “A Liberal Democrat’s Wet Dream”.


5 posted on 08/09/2009 3:28:53 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Porkulus that has not been spent.
6 posted on 08/09/2009 3:33:00 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Surely the money to payoff his political buds iss gone? That was a third of porkulous, if I recall....


7 posted on 08/09/2009 4:04:23 AM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

If it isn’t, they’ll be beating on Zero’s door until they get it. And I’m sure that it was much more than 10%.


8 posted on 08/09/2009 4:12:19 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The plan is to flood the economy with loans and money next year before the elections.

Face it. We have a criminal syndicate running the country.

We have a fascist government.


9 posted on 08/09/2009 4:33:04 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Those embryos are little humans in progress. Using them for profit is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That money is going to buy a lot of votes when it’s cut loose just before the election and for one brief moment makes the future look bright. After the election the inflation hits, but too late.


10 posted on 08/09/2009 4:34:28 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I think ‘Stimulus’ meant ‘stimulate the vote’ in 2010


11 posted on 08/09/2009 4:46:58 AM PDT by Mr. K (THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Nice dream. But dream on.

The money that has been spent has already been leveraged 9:1 through fractional reserve banking. So, a large part of the damage has already been done.

The fed continues to purchase debt openly and cryptically.

The money that is yet to be spent is an election-year vote-buyer. No way will they pull that money back, especially if it can prop up the economy just long enough so that they don’t have to raise taxes during the election year.


12 posted on 08/09/2009 4:50:04 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (It's soft tyranny, folks. It's smiley-faced fascism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
This money will be used to fund their new civilian army, buy votes, and get rid of that pesky Constitution.
13 posted on 08/09/2009 4:52:13 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Obama's lies make Bill Clinton's lie small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

That would make sense, if only they were organized enough to do it.


14 posted on 08/09/2009 4:56:07 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The only real stimulus spending so far has been the cash for clunkers program.

Yes, it's expensive, it targets certain individuals for the benefit, it's inefficient, its ineffective, and there is too much paperwork. But, it's a government program, so what's your point?

And, it actually got people into new car showrooms now, instead of next winter or never. It actually stimulated economic activity in the private sector, which is the sector that needs to be stimulated.

The rest of the spending authorized under the stimulus legislation is just a pre-authorization of future deficits, probably as a professional politician safe-guard in case some common sense and fiscal responsibility infects Washington DC.

15 posted on 08/09/2009 4:56:29 AM PDT by Bernard (If you always tell the truth, you never have to remember exactly what you said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven

Oh, that money will be spent. They’re saving it for election time. It’s their own private re-election fund paid for by we the taxpayers.

They are manipulating the stock market to show a slowing of the “depression” now but by about election time, guess what, they’ll need to throw more of the stimulus into the economy and rescue it once again.

But remember, we HAD to get that money immediately.


16 posted on 08/09/2009 5:07:27 AM PDT by Reagan69 (The only thing SHOVEL-READY since BO's stimulus has been MICHAEL JACKSON (tammy bruce))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

They have only allocated and spent $16,146,449,535.57
https://www.fpds.gov/

Stop it now!
There’s a ton of maintenance spending and fixing up parks and playground in the spending - busy work.


17 posted on 08/09/2009 5:18:34 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Life, Liberty and the Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

90% of the government spending planned by the law has not yet occurred .I can hear Obama and company now ‘we lost it but were looking into it trust me.


18 posted on 08/09/2009 5:33:42 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Why not use a bunch of stimulus money as a major TAX CUT


19 posted on 08/09/2009 6:04:32 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

A few Congressional Republicans have suggested it but fat chance taking the Dhimmi’s slush fund away from them.


20 posted on 08/09/2009 7:41:00 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson