Thanks to NewsBusters for the Tweet.
1 posted on
08/19/2009 3:09:34 PM PDT by
Stoat
To: Stoat
People, especially younger people, are becoming more and more removed from knowledge of the bloody consequences of pure Marxism taken to its illogical conclusion.
To: Stoat
But but the MSNBC hosts said that “socialism” is the n-word
3 posted on
08/19/2009 3:12:39 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Pro-Freedom Fiction Writers Unite! - http://libertyfic.proboards.com)
To: Stoat
Under marxism there would be no reason to write a book and have it published. The government would decide if your book would be printed or not. The government would set the price. The high commisar would decide how much royalty you would receive, if any.
To: Stoat
It’s natural that marx would come back into vogue. After all, one of his disciples got elected president of the USA. Quite naturally, people want to know what baraq is thinking. Learning about marx is a good shortcut into his useless mind.
5 posted on
08/19/2009 3:14:06 PM PDT by
Migraine
(Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
To: Stoat
Engels was proud of his lobster salad and liked to fox hunt. He hosted regular Sunday parties for Londons left-wing intelligentsia and [...] was an advocate, on at least one occasion, of ethnic cleansingTypical leftists elitist.
6 posted on
08/19/2009 3:14:31 PM PDT by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: Stoat
The Left was more disgusted with Karl Rove than Karl Marx.
BUT they still deny that Obama’s “sharing the wealth” from Joe the Plumber’s proposed business was in any way Marxism.
7 posted on
08/19/2009 3:15:13 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: Stoat
The problem with employing ‘useful idiots’ is that they are, in the final analysis, idiots.....
8 posted on
08/19/2009 3:15:25 PM PDT by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: Stoat
This does not suprise me since for some young people, it is fun to wear a Che t-shirt not knowing who the heck Che was.
9 posted on
08/19/2009 3:15:51 PM PDT by
Biggirl
("God Is Great, Beer Is Good, People Are Crazy"-Billy Cunnington :)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: Stoat
Snort. Compare and contrast this assertion with what is on their best seller lists.
10 posted on
08/19/2009 3:17:12 PM PDT by
La Lydia
To: Stoat
The exploitation of the workers in Engels’ family cotton mills subsidized Marx while he was writing “Das Kapital”. The exploitation of the workers in the Soviet Union subsidized Lenin, Stalin et al. in putting Marx’s ideology into practice. In a sense, Engels was the original useful idiot.
11 posted on
08/19/2009 3:22:39 PM PDT by
Argus
(We've gone downtown to Clown Town, and that's where we'll be living from now on..)
To: Stoat
Of course Engels was petit bourgeoisie. His father was a leading capitalist. That was his extent of working knowledge of the proletariat but people still idolize him as an expert. So what we really have here is a wrong-headed, hypocritical, ideological fool with a fine reputation for partying down. I can't wait to see what the author has to say about Kim Jong Il.
To: Stoat
“Looks like meat’s back on the menu, boys.”
14 posted on
08/19/2009 3:28:57 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
To: Stoat; All
15 posted on
08/19/2009 3:33:59 PM PDT by
backhoe
(All across America, the Lights are going out...)
To: Stoat
New York Times book critic Dwight Garner on Wednesday enthused over a new biography of Friedrich Engels, cooing that Marxism is "back in vogue" and adding that the founding communist comes across as a "jovial man of outsize appetites" in Tristram Hunts new biography "Marxs General."IMO, marxism is not now, never has been and never will be "in vogue".
16 posted on
08/19/2009 3:34:20 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson