Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blackwater Disclosure Adds to CIA Worries
washingtonpost ^ | Friday, August 21, 2009 | R. Jeffrey Smith and Joby Warrick

Posted on 08/20/2009 7:21:48 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000

News of 'Targeted Killing' Program Precedes Interrogation Report, Possible Probe

The disclosure Wednesday of the CIA's decision five years ago to let a private security contractor help manage its sensitive effort to kill senior al-Qaeda members drew congressional criticism Thursday on the eve of key decisions by the Obama administration that current and former intelligence officials fear could compound the spy agency's political troubles.

Those decisions include the expected release Monday of newly declassified portions of a 2004 CIA report that questions the legality and effectiveness of the agency's harsh interrogations at secret prisons. Additionally, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. may order a probe of possible criminal actions by CIA officers and contractors during those interrogations.

"In September, you are going to have a hurricane coming through Washington that is aimed right at the intelligence community," warned Porter J. Goss, the CIA's director from September 2004 to May 2006. He noted that a Justice Department inquiry is also pending into whether laws were broken when CIA officers destroyed videotapes of the harsh interrogations.

Democratic House and Senate lawmakers and staff members have already described as inappropriate the Bush administration's decision to hand management and training responsibility for the CIA's "targeted killing" efforts to Blackwater USA, and they have reiterated their intent to press for speedier and more complete disclosure by the agency of such activities in the future. CIA Director Leon Panetta formally terminated the program in June, shortly before he first told Congress of its existence.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the intelligence committee, sharpened her previous criticism of the program. "It is clear to me that the failure to notify before now constituted a violation of law," she said in a statement Thursday.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhodoj; blackwater; cia; gwot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

"You are going to have a hurricane coming through Washington that is aimed right at the intelligence community," former CIA director Porter J. Goss said. (By Lucian Perkins -- The Washington Post)

1 posted on 08/20/2009 7:21:48 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

So they contracted the hit job planning to Blackwater, huh.

Why not to the Mafia, which would have had more experience with that kind of stuff?


2 posted on 08/20/2009 7:24:42 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (59 million Americans joined hands and shouted, "Yes, We Can March off This Cliff!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
effort to kill senior al-Qaeda members drew congressional criticism

Who would have ever thought killing your enemy would draw criticism from a US congressman?

3 posted on 08/20/2009 7:25:54 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

personally i see no problem in having private contractors take out al qaeda operatives if it saved the single life of anyone.

Their whine is that they were not told about it. Well if you told congress everything, you’d get frig all done, thats why we have spy agencies....to stop the shit before it starts.


4 posted on 08/20/2009 7:26:03 PM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
Who are these idiots that believe it is possible to overcome terrorism through appeasement?
5 posted on 08/20/2009 7:27:53 PM PDT by G Larry ( Obamacare=Dying in Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

So what is bad about hiring Blackwater to kill the people with whom the USA is at war? I do not see an issue here.

Blackwater was hired to kill “man-caused disaster-makers” or whatever it is that Homeland Security calls terrorists now.

Far as I can tell, they should have their contract renewed.

Congress seems fixated on hiring Death Panels to kill our US citizens now, rather than kill terrorists.


6 posted on 08/20/2009 7:30:23 PM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

I agree.


7 posted on 08/20/2009 7:31:41 PM PDT by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

The real reason the left is up in arms about this is the fact they hate anything that has the nations best interest at heart.


8 posted on 08/20/2009 7:34:13 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

its like, hired mercenaries were used to take out a bunch of murdering terrorist scum.....and the problem is what exactly?

Were they waiting on sending Joe Biden or Bill Richardson in to discuss it over a cup of tea and ask the nasty men to play fair and stop shooting at us.

This administration is playing a very dangerous game with the “agencies”, these guys have a way of making you disappear or setting you up to ruin, i would not piss them off.


9 posted on 08/20/2009 7:38:06 PM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Why not to the Mafia, which would have had more experience with that kind of stuff?

No they wouldn't.
Using firms like Blackwater for "sensitive" missions against the enemy is good strategery. Problems only arise when America-hating scumbags like Holder and the Demorats decide to go after intelligence agencies because going straight after the military is too politically risky for those cowards.

10 posted on 08/20/2009 7:42:54 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

I think this is bogus Panetta covering his rear:

Daily Beast: Leon Panetta’s an incompetent moron who’s jeopardizing U.S. security
posted at 9:51 pm on August 19, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The Daily Beast is a center-left/RINO news outlet, so for them to kneecap The One this way is nothing short of shocking. So awful that I don’t even know how to excerpt it. Arguably the most damning story to emerge about Obama’s administrative competence since the inauguration.

Remember a few months ago when Panetta wet his pants about some supposed CIA plan to assassinate Al Qaeda leaders that Congress hadn’t been briefed on (but which had been public knowledge since 2002)?

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/19/daily-beast-leon-panettas-an-incompetent-moron-whos-jeopardizing-us-security/

CIA Director Leon Panetta’s emergency testimony to Congress about an illegal assassination program has set off a crisis at the spy agency. The Daily Beast’s Joseph Finder exclusively reports that:

• The secret assassination ‘program’ wasn’t much more than a PowerPoint presentation, a task force and a collection of schemes—it never got off the ground

• Panetta’s three immediate predecessors—George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden—have spoken to him, and that he now sees that no laws were broken.

• Panetta has frantically tried to rectify his gaffe, but now faces increased Congressional oversight.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-08-18/spy-agency-fiasco/full/


11 posted on 08/20/2009 8:06:45 PM PDT by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

In other words, the Democrats have just blown yet another classified operation during war-time.

I realize the word “treason” doesn’t mean much anymore, especially when you’re dealing with Democrats, but good Lord. Isn’t there anyone left in the Democratic Party that gives a rip about national security? Isn’t anyone left in the Democratic Party who isn’t actively hoping Al Qaeda will win this war?

Because you’re out there, brother, you’re in the wrong party. You’ve been left behind. You may as well admit it and get thee out from among them. If you love your country, and I mean this sincerely, you have no place in that party anymore.


12 posted on 08/20/2009 8:07:41 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Per article they did NOT contract hit.

“but two former intelligence officers familiar with the effort said the company had received millions of dollars for helping train and equip teams to undertake the killings. “

They contracted training to the CIA for the hits.

This is total BS.


13 posted on 08/20/2009 8:09:47 PM PDT by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Well I never said that they mercenaried Blackwater.


14 posted on 08/20/2009 8:14:32 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (59 million Americans joined hands and shouted, "Yes, We Can March off This Cliff!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marron
In other words, the Democrats have just blown yet another classified operation during war-time.

Yep now the whole jihader world knows that Blackwater has the nitty gritty on how the US picks off al-Qaeda. Way to go Rats!

15 posted on 08/20/2009 8:16:19 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (59 million Americans joined hands and shouted, "Yes, We Can March off This Cliff!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

You are correct. I’m sorry.


16 posted on 08/20/2009 8:19:24 PM PDT by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Obama and his commie jackboots are out to destroy the CIA. We need to stop them. If this country is to survive, we’ll need the CIA.


17 posted on 08/20/2009 8:26:56 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (January 20th, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

“This administration is playing a very dangerous game with the “agencies””

Absolutely. The “agencies” should be considered a national resource, rather than a pinata. The public may not have the goods on Obama, but the intelligence community certainly does. There are even folks within, that are patriots. It is a simple matter to provide the dirt at an appropriate time. After that, you just let the public disapproval over the situation take its course. It would not take a huge amount of unfavorable, but verifiable, information to effectively kneecap Obama and his minions in the popular view.

Any guess on how long it will be before these “items” begin to appear? I’m sure there are those within the community that would view it as a public service.


18 posted on 08/20/2009 8:31:35 PM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Cheaper than war in the long run, and practically zero collateral damages.


19 posted on 08/20/2009 8:38:46 PM PDT by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Have Gun Will Travel

wire Paladin, San Francisco


20 posted on 08/20/2009 10:19:18 PM PDT by ASOC (Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson