Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Kennedy Funeral - A Golden Opportunity or Capitulation for the Catholic Church
Life Site News ^ | 8-26-09 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 08/27/2009 10:22:18 PM PDT by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-237 next last
To: goat granny
so he could marry the second wife within the church..

Incorrect. Kennedy was married to Reggie in a civil ceremony in his home in McLean, VA on 3 July 1992, not in a church. There's no indication that his second marriage was a sacramental one.

Making his children bastards.

Wrong again.

61 posted on 08/28/2009 5:23:24 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Happyinmygarden

“I’m glad I’m no longer Catholic and participate in a church that steadfastly defends the life of the unborn.”

Then I was right.


62 posted on 08/28/2009 5:33:42 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("Live Free or Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

The Kennedy Funeral - A Golden Opportunity or Capitulation for the Catholic Church

Correction: The Kennedy Funeral - A Golden Opportunity or Capitulation for the Archdiocese of Boston

63 posted on 08/28/2009 5:34:15 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twink

“maybe one day we’ll all be self righteous about Jews or some Protestant Demonination that some public official belongs to.”

Unfortunately, they won’t be held to the same standards.

Devout Catholics will have to do a penance of listening to the non-Catholics and ex-Catholics shaking their fingers at them and agitating the issue ~ acting all self-righteous and superior about their claims to being more pro-life than others and taking broadsides at decent practicing, pro-life Catholic Christians.

That’s kind of childish, and as I had predicted in my original post.


64 posted on 08/28/2009 5:48:13 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("Live Free or Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


65 posted on 08/28/2009 5:54:49 AM PDT by NYer ( "One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone"- Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

You have no idea what Laura Bush would or would not do.
What’s with the “Irish TRASH” comment? Are we, perhaps, seeing a resurgence of !9th Century Racism?


66 posted on 08/28/2009 6:15:00 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Faith
This makes me sick. I will pray. But we're caught in a hell-designed situation where the Left leverages Kennedy's fdeah as an oranizing tool, the sexually disordered and abortion-enthusiasts trumpet his glory, while the upright, struggling with their sense of outraged decency, are silenced with nil nisi bonum.
67 posted on 08/28/2009 6:16:38 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("He who is not angry when there is a just cause for anger, sins." St. Augustine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

“Bastard” is a term not found in canon law or Catholic tradition. The Church uses the phrase “natural child.”


68 posted on 08/28/2009 6:18:07 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

The question is not of a civil marriage, which confers legitimacy on the children, but of a sacramental marriage. They are two entirely different things. One is a true marriage, with Christ at the center, the two people intending to be married forever and accepting children as the fruit of the marriage. The other is merely a shacking up, made legal by the laws of the land.


69 posted on 08/28/2009 6:18:58 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: redhead
Divorced? Pro Abortion? I thought this guy had been excommunicated years ago. What is wrong with the Catholic
heirarchy? Were they bought off like Dominic Arena and the Kopechne’s?
70 posted on 08/28/2009 6:21:19 AM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redhead
Divorced? Pro Abortion? I thought this guy had been excommunicated years ago. What is wrong with the Catholic
heirarchy? Were they bought off like Dominic Arena and the Kopechne’s?
71 posted on 08/28/2009 6:21:39 AM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redhead
Divorced? Pro Abortion? I thought this guy had been excommunicated years ago. What is wrong with the Catholic
heirarchy? Were they bought off like Dominic Arena and the Kopechne’s?
72 posted on 08/28/2009 6:22:04 AM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

“Bastard” is a legal category, not a church one. A church annulment has no effect on the legal status of children.


73 posted on 08/28/2009 6:28:28 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: redhead
I'm from Boston and there has been no mention in the local media of who will be saying the Mass. Also, I go to daily Mass, and there has been no mention of Kennedy this week (three different priests), not offering the Mass for him, no mention by name in the Petitions -- though the pastor did offer one petition that politicians who claim to be Christian should start acting that way. (I think our pastor is fairly close to the Cardinal; he holds some kind of Archdiocese position in addition to being our pastor.)

The funeral Mass is to be at Mission Church, and I'm unclear as to its status within the Archdiocese. It does function as a parish, with parish boundaries, but it's not staffed by diocesan priests -- it's always been staffed by the Redemptorists, and I wonder if the Order actually has ownership rights.

74 posted on 08/28/2009 6:33:37 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maryz
The funeral Mass is to be at Mission Church, and I'm unclear as to its status within the Archdiocese. It does function as a parish, with parish boundaries, but it's not staffed by diocesan priests -- it's always been staffed by the Redemptorists, and I wonder if the Order actually has ownership rights.

Ahhh, I wondered about that. The MSM would never report such a thing because they don't quite understand the difference. That makes more sense. I'm somewhat surprised that it's the Redemptorists rather than the Jesuits, though.

75 posted on 08/28/2009 6:36:40 AM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Twink

“You’re no longer Catholic so why do you even care what happens in the Catholic Church?”

I can’t say that I do care, actually, but it is a shame that an organization with such enormous influence and power can’t unit on such a basic issue (that they claim is a tenet of their faith) and use their power for good. Think of the enormously impressive results if they ‘put their foot down’ and stuck to it.


76 posted on 08/28/2009 6:48:42 AM PDT by Happyinmygarden (Yes, actually, I have pretty much seen and heard it all before...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Also, Cardinal Seán's Blog has no mention of him -- though there is an entry for The legacy of Eunice Kennedy Shriver. Hmmm . . .
77 posted on 08/28/2009 6:56:28 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Happyinmygarden
Well, if it's any consolation, if you consider that a public official of over 40 years generally is buried from a Cathedral with the bishop or archbishop presiding, and Teddy is being buried from a parish, NOT the cathedral, run by the Redemptorists, who are, well the Redemptorists who are not under the authority of the local ordinary - Ted Kennedy just got dissed by the Church. No Cathedral, no Sean Cardinal O’Malley - no JESUITS??????? For the family that kept them in the news for so many years? Yeah, it's not subtle. The official Church does not approve.
78 posted on 08/28/2009 7:01:12 AM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: maryz
See my post #78. With no Mass at the cathedral and the archbishop not in attendance for a public official...yeah, not even subtle. I assume the Redemptorists there are the same as they are here - do what they want and the archdiocese considers it a place to stash the revolutionaries.
79 posted on 08/28/2009 7:04:37 AM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I don't know much about them -- not anything really, except for their connection with Mission, which is, incidentally, a huge and very beautiful church.

It just struck me that maybe Kennedy's being buried in Arlington because, well, I believe the Catholic cemeteries here are owned by the Archdiocese!

80 posted on 08/28/2009 7:13:13 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson