Posted on 09/01/2009 6:10:29 PM PDT by RobinMasters
WND has found new evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama's mother, was in Seattle in August 1961, within days of her son's birth, contrary to the accepted narrative.
In a video that has been removed from the Internet since the 2008 presidential campaign, Susan Blake, a high school friend of Obama's mother, gave an interview in which she discussed seeing Dunham shortly after Barack Obama Jr.'s Aug. 4, 1961, birth.
The video can be seen here:
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Item 1 -— See below.
Item 2 — Why did John Roberts ignore Item 1 and swear in Hussein? Good question! He should be held accountable!
Now for the constituional part......
_________________________________________
The Constitution and de Vattel’s Law of Nations has the answer to any questions regarding citizenship abroad and any laws crossing national boundaries:
EXCERPT 1. U.S. Constitution, Article II, §1:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, OR a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
EXCERPT 2: de Vattel’s Law of Nations circa 1758 Book 1, Chapter XIX, § 212:
The natives, or NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.
Finally, the main item in the Constitution that ties both together:
EXCERPT 3: U.S. Constitution, Article I, §8:
The Congress shall have Power.To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations
Yes, Law of Nations is CAPITALIZED, meaning our framers were citing a proper name. There was only one Law of Nations in 1787 officially declared. And yes, Congress has the power to create and enforce ANY LAW mentioned in the Law of Nations written by Emmerich de Vattel! It was sitting right under our noses the entire time.
We need an archivist here, like alamo-girl did on Clinton. Every day there are basic questions and new people and we repeat a lot of the information.
How to change his diaper? After she had had him for weeks? How long had that diaper been on him??
It just doesn’t make sense why someone would lie about that.
LOL!
You and a lot of other people. ;)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107889
You must have a different link or still have it in your cache...
****************************************************
Quote removed
I took out:
The fact that Barack Sr.'s granddad objected is given in the sentence before, so no information is lost. I think a lot of people will find this quote offensive and it doesn't really add much to our understanding of Ann, who is the subject of the article after all. Another objection that could be made is that Barack Jr., whose interest was to tell his life story in a dramatic way, didn't really know anything about his grandfather's state of mind. I don't think that he ever met him. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Seems to me . that in their efforts to buff the image of Obama...they are actually wanting to remove evidence that Stanley Ann might be actually be his mother ( or could be a different white woman I guess )....ROFL!
This is nonsense. They were not citing a book. They were citing a term. The same term that an author used to title his book.
Vattel's book is not the Constitution. The Constitution is not a blanket endorsement of everything Vattel ever wrote. This is not rational thinking.
In English common law, which is not what Vattel was talking about but is what applied in the colonies, a "natural born" subject is simply someone born within the country.
Isn’t it somewhat odd that Wikipedia calls her Ann Dunham? Her name was Stanley Ann Dunham. And, from what I understand, she called herself Stanley, at least in her younger years.
It seems that the touching up begins very early in this entry.
It was common practice at the time the Constitution was written to capitalize important traditional phrases such as Common Law, the Law of Nations, or Natural Law.
Or, for example, Original Sin, or Constitution. This was to indicate that you were not talking about any old sin but Original Sin, and not any old constitution but THE Constitution.
So why the divorce if the never married?
Yes, but her social security number is still active and is being used by a "Scott Dunham" or a "Kelly Dunham" in NY.
Could her reported cancer death merely be a cover for a sex change operation?
” and not one record from law school, birth, or anything
else.”
I think you are on to the real story here. Even if he’s born in the USA there’s probably something else in the other info he doesn’t wanted revealed.
Thats the only reason I can see why he’s fighting the release of his long form birth certificate
I found the video on YouTube, here is the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNisUajDsNk
Its on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNisUajDsNk
See, there you go.
She could be stalking and walking among us.
;)
I think a bird CRAPPED on a rock and the sun hatched him.
I am surprised that nobody caught that. After pondering it a bit. If Ann had delivered in Kenya or Hawaii, she had a recuperating period (In those days, up to 2 weeks), where the hospital too care of diapers, then home to Grandma, whether in Kenya or Hawaii. It was only after leaving those safe confines to continue school (speculation on my part), that she then had to change the baby boy that was called Barry. I am sure that she breast fed from birth, so knew how to do that...
What say you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.