Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Boats Delayed Because Of Many Manufacturing Defects
strategy page ^ | 09-06-09 | staff

Posted on 09/06/2009 9:41:10 AM PDT by em2vn

A manufacturing problem with the U.S. Navy's new Virginia class SSNs (nuclear attack subs) has delayed the commissioning of a new boat, the USS New Mexico. The ceremony will be delayed from November 21st, to sometime in January or February. The problem has to do with bolts that were not manufactured to specifications. These bolts hold together the track system that is used to move torpedoes and other weapons around the "weapons room". The poorly manufactured bolts will hold the tracks together under peacetime conditions. But in the stress of combat (like depth charges or violent maneuvers) they are likely to fail. The navy not only wants to get the proper bolts, but also is inspecting hundreds of other bolts in the weapons room, and perhaps other items as well. This anxiety is because the bolt situation is not the first manufacturing problem the Virginias have encountered lately.

(Excerpt) Read more at strategypage.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bolts; navair; submarines; welds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Dick Bachert

Do the $12 mil include that lethal looking weepon? If he fires that, the pram will be propelled backwards at terminal velocity (whatever that may be).


41 posted on 09/06/2009 2:54:38 PM PDT by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: magslinger
Never forget that your ship/aircraft/weapon was built by the lowest bidder.
And a lot of the 'winning' designs were the result of competitions between Aerospace companies/contractors, in a lot of cases are the result of decades, if not centuries worth of experience on the part of the design staff, and also that so-called 'lowest bidder' contract might turn out to be a cost-plus contract on new technology/development stuff ...

I think it is unfair to simply label equipment deisgned for out fighting military as 'built by the lowest bidder'. Some competance is also expected by those bidding on such contracts, especially on the higher-performance or performance-critical platforms (think aircraft, satellites).

42 posted on 09/06/2009 6:09:45 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: _Jim

Everything you say is true. The US aquires some of the finest weapon systems in the world and it is unfair to refer to them as being made by the lowest bidder, but when you are in the field and run up against the technical limitations of aforementioned system, fair ain’t in it.


43 posted on 09/07/2009 12:49:51 PM PDT by magslinger (Inside every father is a Bryan Mills waiting to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson