Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/06/2009 10:31:50 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Delacon; ..
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 09/06/2009 10:34:08 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("Power is not alluring to pure minds." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Quantify Political Oral Flatulence! Can anyone say Political suicide.


3 posted on 09/06/2009 10:34:48 AM PDT by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

cover the administrative expensives of implementing its aggressive strategy to curb global warming, regulating a broad swath of society from big-rigs to landfills to air conditioners. There are about 175 employees working on climate change issues associated with the board's campaign.

--

175 employees working to destroy this state's economy. amazing. and I bet everyone of them is a new hire, while the state augers into the abyss.

4 posted on 09/06/2009 10:34:51 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Just one more reason to move out of California and for businesses not to locate in California. A bigger bunch of corrupt politicians only exist in the White House. Corrupt Democrats in Sacramento and the incompetent former body builder governor. Dumb and Dumber.


5 posted on 09/06/2009 10:36:06 AM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Illegals will be exempt


6 posted on 09/06/2009 10:36:35 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
CA: State fees on greenhouse gas output could be near
Is this just on CO2 or on H2O vapor as well?
7 posted on 09/06/2009 10:36:37 AM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

How long before a decree out of Washington mandates that the rest us states pay to bail California out to save them from themselves?


8 posted on 09/06/2009 10:41:40 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

“Regulators estimate that overall, the average consumer will pay less than $1.50 a year more once the fee is passed down by energy providers and others that release greenhouse gasses linked to global warming.”

And I believe in the Easter Bunny and Tinker Belle are married.

Dear Lord above, Don’t these people even bother to run the numbers before they print this stuff?

“The fee is expected to initially raise about $50 million a year, starting in mid-2010. At first, industry would pay 12 cents for every ton of carbon dioxide released. Annualized costs spread out among consumers and businesses seem small: 62 cents on utility bills and perhaps 65 cents at the gas pump for economy cars. A supermarket would pay $95, a family restaurant $14 and a 100-person office $7, according to state estimates.”

This will immediately be hiked as soon as it is found out to be “TOO LOW” aka we need more money to run the state.


9 posted on 09/06/2009 10:42:28 AM PDT by The Working Man (Any work is better than "welfare")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Regulators estimate that overall, the average consumer will pay less than $1.50 a year more

Right. And Social Security was only going to be levied on the first 3000 per year of income, and Medicare was only supposed to cost about 20 billion by now.

Looks like California really does want to return to the wild.

13 posted on 09/06/2009 10:51:47 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Since methane exhibits a stronger greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide, why don’t they tax beans?


17 posted on 09/06/2009 11:05:09 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"CA: State fees on greenhouse gas output could be near"

Taxing the air we breathe. Who'd have thought that we'd actually see the day our own governments would do such a laughable thing that just a few short generations ago was a joke.
Even worse, who'd have thought that the citizens of this nation would let a government so such a ridiculous, laughable thing?

It doesn't take a whole lot of intelligence to see that- The government of Calipornia has spend above and beyond the atrocious amounts of revenues produced by their slaves (they call themselves taxpayers, because they like to hold on to the illusion that they are somehow "free") and are in desperate need to take even more from their slaves, cutting their living allowances, and removing what the overlords see as excessive, which allows them to indulge in "unhealthy behaviors".

It also doesn't take a whole lot of intelligence to see through the "global warming' B.S. that the government overlords have carefully constructed (to the best of their abilities anyway) as a reason for this reduction of living allowances- which is really for the slaves own benefit, that the slaves will actually live better and prosper from this reduction of living allowances which they are allowed to keep.

This was never about "saving the planet from certain doom", as the great Goracle was proselytizing so vehemently.
It's about creating a vast, bottomless moneypit of revenues that the overlords in government can spend (for our own betterment of course) on whatever whimsical notion they come across in order to create they disneyland-like fantasy alternate reality civilization so many of their favorite science fiction writers have written about, or saw portrayed by their favorite Hollywierdo movie maker, in which every person will be happy and live in a star trek like civilization, no need for money, each a "scientist" of technition of some type all working to gether to solve the many problems they come across as they explore Gods imperfect creation, although they don't really believe in A god, just "Q" people with god-like powers who create things to amuse themselves, at the expense of others who they must rescue.

18 posted on 09/06/2009 11:13:35 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

With these kind of crazy rules no wonder jobs are leaving the state. I do not know how the state is ever going to get out of this mess. I guess this is what the whole country will be like 10 years from now.


19 posted on 09/06/2009 11:14:25 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Sue the state for green house gases they have failed to contain by not putting out the fires.


20 posted on 09/06/2009 11:15:59 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

>>Regulators estimate that overall, the average consumer will pay less than $1.50 a year more once the fee is passed down by energy providers and others that release greenhouse gasses

If that’s “all” it’s going to cost (which works out to $50M/year), why bother passing it. The state of California spends that much every 4 1/2 hours!


24 posted on 09/06/2009 11:23:39 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Question O-thority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Man, they really don’t get it.

Say goodbye to more industries and more of the tax-paying population.

Soon... only the illegals will be there draining the system.


25 posted on 09/06/2009 11:26:04 AM PDT by ataDude (Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

How much of that awful green house gas will one emit on the way OUT of kali?


28 posted on 09/06/2009 11:34:58 AM PDT by Waco (OK Libs, stop emitiNG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Regulators estimate that overall, the average consumer will pay less than $1.50 a year more once the fee is passed down by energy providers and others that release greenhouse gasses linked to global warming.

Yeah sure. Cap'nTrade did a lot worse damage than that to the German economy. WSJ, 9/11/2006, p.A1.

30 posted on 09/06/2009 3:33:32 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson