[HorowitzianConservative]

Horowitz weighs in on Van Jones

[TaxPayer2000]

This is not news to me. The democrats have always been comfortable with communists, racists and anti-semites.

[Reddy]

The Democrats are comfortable with communists, racists and anti-semites? Heck, they elected one to the office of POTUS!

[NativeNewYorker]

Lessons of the Van Jones Affair: Democrats Are Comfortable With Communists, Racists and Anti-Semites

Fixed.

[MizSterious]

Ping—Horowitz says the same thing we were saying on the other thread!

[WilliamofCarmichael]

The 1960s Marxist-Alinsky hippie street rabble and their ideological issue (children)-cum-Rat Party (formerly the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party) Are Comfortable With Communists, Racists and Anti-Semites

Ya think.

(That ain't name calling. The Sixties Marxist-Alinsky hippie street rabble really have taken over the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party. Under the hail of "neo-con" taunts many Democrats fled the Party.)

[armymarinedad]

Short and to the point. From a man who helped write the book.

[MizSterious]

"There are no scoundrels, America haters, racists — that Democrats won’t assimlate."

This is why I not only refuse to ever vote for a 'Rat again, but I won't even associate with them.

[Leonard210]

I am much more interested in his conclusion and a solution:

“Let me just single out one problem, because it’s the one conservatives can actually affect. And that is to start calling things by their right names. The timidity and cowardice of Republicans towards Democratic Party ourtages of this nature is a principal culprit. When you call Communists ‘liberals’ it legitimizes them. The time has come to stop it. To stop the charade, stick your head out the window and say ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.’”

This is exactly correct. I’ve railed about using the term “Main Stream” to refer to the communications arm of the Democratic party precisely because it legitimizes them. Earlier today I read a post where someone referred to the “Institutional Press”. When we, in the “blogosphere”, begin to correct the notion that the “press” represents anything other than the Democratic Party, others will have to follow suit. IMHO

[Mach9]

The branding here lacks ‘comfortable with terrorists.’

[Anti-Bubba182]

"..How did things get to this pass? Let me just single out one problem, because it’s the one conservatives can actually affect. And that is to start calling things by their right names. The timidity and cowardice of Republicans towards Democratic Party ourtages of this nature is a principal culprit. When you call Communists “liberals” it legitimizes them. The time has come to stop it. To stop the charade , stick your head out the window and say “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.”.."

I don't see the GOP growing balls like that. Beck has them, and bet the rent the left will be after Beck forever.

[La Lydia]

But they will roll them under bus, along with Grandma and the Rev. Wright, once they are outed. I vote for Mark Lloyd to be next in line.

[Sig Sauer P220]

And yet, if GWB was conducting himself exactly the same way zero is, the media and demwits would be having a knipshin.

[cranked]

Dems and libtards are comfortable with such because the elites who represent Dems and Libtards are in fact Communists, Socialists, racists, bigots, and anti-semites.