Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House source: We never asked Van Jones to fill out the vetting questionnaire
Hot Air ^ | SEPTEMBER 07, 2009 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 09/07/2009 5:17:08 PM PDT by RobinMasters

I don’t believe them. Or rather, I don’t believe that this is some innocent blind spot in the vetting process.

An administration official said special advisers to the president, or czars, are not required to fill out the questionnaire that runs 7 pages and contains 63 questions.

The entire questionnaire, the official said, is reserved for appointees who must win Senate confirmation…

Question 61 reads as follows: “Have you had any association with any person, group or business venture that could be used - even unfairly - to impugn or attack your character and qualifications for government service?”…

An administration official said Jones never hid his controversial associations or remarks from the White House.

“It wouldn’t be fair to characterize him as being dishonest or hiding his comments or his positions,” the official said. “It’s just fair to say that he didn’t go through the most rigorous vetting process.”

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911truther; bho44; blunders; communist; mullahobama; valeriejarrett; vanjones; vetting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2009 5:17:09 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“An administration official said Jones never hid his controversial associations or remarks from the White House.”

Will that is worse yet....if he never hide it and they knew about it.......................


2 posted on 09/07/2009 5:20:13 PM PDT by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Well, there you go. That’s why you come off looking like idiots. That’s the whole point of the questions. What amateurs.

Or, they already knew the answers and decided not to care, assuming no one would find out. What amateurs.

Conservatives will do you vetting for you. What professionals.


3 posted on 09/07/2009 5:20:47 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Or the rest of the czars.


4 posted on 09/07/2009 5:22:24 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

American electrate: We never asked Bary Dunham Soetoro to fill out the vetting questionnaire


5 posted on 09/07/2009 5:22:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Don’t vet nominees

Don’t read legislation

Don’t audit stimulus money


6 posted on 09/07/2009 5:22:45 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Oh gee,

I forgot to ask.........


7 posted on 09/07/2009 5:23:08 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

In a way it makes sense—everything about these clowns is likely already on the internet—just assume the worst and let it go at that—even if they filled out the forms they would likely lie anyway—either way wtf...


8 posted on 09/07/2009 5:23:19 PM PDT by gunnyg (SUFFER NOT FOOLS -Gunny G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
An administration official said special advisers to the president, or czars, are not required to fill out the questionnaire that runs 7 pages and contains 63 questions. The entire questionnaire, the official said, is reserved for appointees who must win Senate confirmation.

Isn't that interesting?

I know there is precedent for Presidents to appoint these czars, but maybe it's time for this practice of filling the government with people who answer to the President alone to stop.

If the President wants to ask his own advisers about something, he should make sure they are not on our payroll, and that their visits to the White House are known to the American people.

9 posted on 09/07/2009 5:25:45 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

A Communist agent is put in charge of a $80 billion budget with absolutely no background check?

A total lie, or treasonous conspiracy. One or the other.


10 posted on 09/07/2009 5:25:54 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I am really getting fed up, especially with Fox. This “Did the White House vet Van Jones”? is complete B*LLSH*T! VETTED? Yeah, he was vetted and he PASSED WITH FLYING COLORS! This is WHO they in the White House are! Actually, there was no need to vet this Marxist. His credentials are all over the internet. He’s talking about Power-to-the-People-this and Transforming-America-That! There’s no question as to his political persuassion.


11 posted on 09/07/2009 5:28:01 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ("The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

EXACTLY....Van Jones is Obomba’s ALTER EGO!


12 posted on 09/07/2009 5:29:46 PM PDT by goodnesswins (George Orwell would be proud. Truth are lies, Slavery is Freedom, Oppression is Feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I imagine they were intimidated by his “legendary” and “towering” figure. Well, it happens.


13 posted on 09/07/2009 5:30:21 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (ObamaCare! When "natural causes" just isn't good enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Yep. Can’t argue with that.


14 posted on 09/07/2009 5:31:29 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
From Michelle Malcolm's story a couple days ago:

Obama czardom is the deliberate end-run around transparency. Van Jones did not just accidentally slip through the cracks of the Obama vetters. They knew what he espoused before they installed him.

Take it from Obama’s own political godmother Michelle and Barack’s consigliere and Chicago powerbroker Valerie Jarrett took full credit at the nuttroots dKos blogger conference last month (August 15, 2009) for recruiting him and closely following his career:

JARRETT:. You guys know Van Jones? [Applause. Moderator injects: "This is his house apparently."]

JARRETT: Oooh. Van Jones, alright! So, Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We were watching him, uh, really, he’s not that old, for as long as he’s been active out in Oakland. And all the creative ideas he has. And so now, we have captured that. And we have all that energy in the White House.

Jarrett, as I pointed out on Sean Hannity’s radio show five weeks ago, is the self-proclaimed keeper of Obama’s urban/racial “authenticity.” The Obamas don’t make a move without her, according to their closest friends and allies. Jarrett’s praise for Jones’s Oakland activism is explicit endorsement of his race-baiting career at Ella Baker, funded by the Soros-supported Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights/Ford Foundation/Rockefeller Foundation, and his Free Mumia agitation in the Bay Area schools — where he lambasted moderate civil rights leaders for objecting to politicizing the classrooms and where his pro-Mumia allies likened supporters of murdered police officer Daniel Faulkner to the KKK.



They knew EXACTLY who he is, and know these other Marxists they have surrounded themselves with, too. They have been chosen PRECISELY BECAUSE they are fellow travelers.

15 posted on 09/07/2009 5:31:35 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

They knew he was a communist, and that was good enough for them...


16 posted on 09/07/2009 5:31:47 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
This is all very believable. Obama has not been able to attract much talent at any level. The primary problem is that EVERYBODY, including hard-core left Democrats, expect this guy to be, at most, a one-term President.

People don't take time-out from their careers with "government service" without some expectation of benefit downstream. One of the benefits is a FEDERAL RETIREMENT ANNUITY. Might not seem like much, but you only need 5 years to qualify for the minimum payment. Their present high salaries might look pretty puny down the road, but they'll still be considerably higher than the average federal worker at retirement which multiplied against a "high three" may be fair dinkum..

A one-term President will simply ruin your promotion opportunities every single time, so all you'll get out of these appointments is about 3.5 years service time. It takes another 1.5 years to get that 5, and your time working as an appointee in the FAILED OBAMA REGIME is not going to help you get a "better job" or an equal appointment in some hypothetical future Democrat Presidency.

17 posted on 09/07/2009 5:32:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Yalle:

They are lying. They have been lying for nearly two years now... everything from not knowing who Rev.Wright was, to denying that Ayres was something more than a professor down the street to the latest: Obama administration lied about not knowing about the Lockerbie bomber release

It is complete BS that they didn't know (as my post just above this one shows)... they simply don't have the courage or decency to admit the truth.
18 posted on 09/07/2009 5:38:45 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The Clinton administration didn’t accomplish security checks. Why would anyone expect the illegitimate president to accomplish security checks or vettings? I don’t. If he did, he should start with himself and that ain’t going to happen.


19 posted on 09/07/2009 5:39:55 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Obama couldn’t pass his own screening process.


20 posted on 09/07/2009 5:42:32 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson