Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

48% Want Abortion Coverage Banned in Health Care Plan
Rasmussen Reports ^ | September 17, 2009

Posted on 09/18/2009 10:26:00 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The health care reform legislation working its way through Congress faces many obstacles primarily because it touches so many aspects of life. The abortion issue is one more with the potential to create a lose-lose situation for advocates of the plan.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% believe any government-subsidized health care plan should be prohibited from covering abortion procedures. Thirteen percent (13%) believe such plans should be required to cover abortions, and 32% favor a more neutral approach with no requirements in either direction.

Among those who currently support passage of the legislation, 22% want a prohibition banning abortion coverage and 22% want a mandate requiring such coverage. Forty-seven percent (47%) of the plan’s supporters prefer the neutral approach, and nine percent (9%) are not sure.

Among those who oppose the plan, 72% favor a prohibition against coverage of abortions while five percent (5%) hold the opposite view.

It is not clear how many people on either side would switch their position on the overall plan specifically because of a change in abortion policy.

Overall, support for the health care reform plan proposed by the president and congressional Democrats has remained steady over the past few months. Among all voters, a slight majority has been consistently opposed to passage of the plan. Republicans overwhelmingly oppose the proposal while Democrats overwhelmingly support it. Most unaffiliated voters are opposed to the current plan.

A similar divide is found on the abortion issue. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans favor an abortion ban while 43% of Democrats prefer a neutral approach. Among those not affiliated with either major party, a plurality (48%) would like to see a prohibition.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; healthcare; polls; rasmussen

1 posted on 09/18/2009 10:26:00 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I have never understood why terminating a pregnancy is healthcare, since it does not improve the health of the woman or of the aborted baby.


2 posted on 09/18/2009 10:28:23 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Banned abortion would be bad news for hookers and a cheating girl friend.


3 posted on 09/18/2009 10:29:13 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
umm. right. abortion is intolerable under any circumstances.

but so is a government healthcare dictate, and taking abortion out of the proposal will not make it any less so.

If we fall for the compromise that was built into this travesty to begin with, we're no less the losers.

4 posted on 09/18/2009 10:35:07 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (hang the Czars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

48% is pathetically low. Indicative of our culture I guess.


5 posted on 09/18/2009 10:37:38 AM PDT by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas

>> 48% is pathetically low. Indicative of our culture I guess.

Damn, my thoughts exactly. It’s disturbing the willingness so many have to expunge innocent life from the face of the Earth.


6 posted on 09/18/2009 10:42:38 AM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

I have never understood how that “do no harm” thing fit into freely killing a baby.


7 posted on 09/18/2009 10:56:14 AM PDT by Gator113 (YES WE CAN.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cMxJBenigY&feature=related)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Along with Roe v. Wade came a reinterpretation and, even more often, a replacement of the Hippocratic oath which, in addition to cautioning “do no harm,” explicitly forbade abortion of any kind.


8 posted on 09/18/2009 11:31:19 AM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
"I have never understood how that “do no harm” thing fit into freely killing a baby."

It's now known as the hypocritical oath.

9 posted on 09/18/2009 11:33:51 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson