Posted on 09/21/2009 7:03:17 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Leon Brozyna Says: September 21st, 2009 at 4:09 am
Dr. Taitz:
In perusing a number of web sites and commentary on the Rhodes case and the latest results, I find that the comments generally fall into two groups —
*** 1 - the judge is terrible and the ruling is an injustice.
*** 2 - the judge is correct in properly smacking down Orly.
I suggest that there is a third possibility that exists that no one seems to have publicly mentioned — that Judge Land is brilliant by handing down a deliberately inflammatory ruling bordering on judicial misconduct thereby inviting Rule 11 discovery.
Just think about it for a minute.
If Judge Land had granted the TRO, the case might have dragged on for months before getting to the discovery phase. On the other hand, the judge could have dispassionately denied the TRO by narrowly interpreting the law in favor of the defendants and Cpt Rhodes would have deployed to Iraq, making further motions moot.
By ruling as he did, as though he was having a judicial melt-down, it seems he has practically handed you an engraved invitation to submit a motion for Rule 11 discovery. Did he do this deliberately in the hope that you would take this route? We’ll never know. Even if this case blows up in Obama’s face, Judge Land’s thought processes may remain forever hidden (unless he has his memoirs published after he retires or dies). The point is that you now have, in this case, the best possibility to go for discovery - perhaps even better than in the case pending before Judge Carter. Craft your arguments carefully - Obama’s defense team may come to really hate Judge Land for his seeming melt-down.
Another thought - there was an earlier case in which the judge dismissed plaintiff’s motion and referred to blogs, the internet, twittering, etc. in his ruling. Made quite a splash when the ruling was handed down. I believe the case is still out on appeal - may have tried for rule 11 discovery based on judge’s conduct. Something else you may want to look into after you’ve responded to defendant’s motion before Judge Carter.
Everything seems to be coming together. The next few weeks may just turn out to be the most important in our Republic’s history. Our prayers are with you.
Leon Brozyna CW2, USA (Ret)
This is a porton of Orly’s reply to denial:
“The fact that the court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate ‘chain of command’ alleged above not to address [the questions,]” the motion said.
The motion described the judge’s decision as “manifestly unjust and incorrect.”
“Dem’s fightin’ werds” ! ! ! Hope it doesn’t back fire !
Has any lawyer communicated to ORLY of this ? is she aware of this ?
What is it you think “Rule 11 discovery” means?
Kathleen Turner was a major babe. She hasn’t weathered well, alcohol problems.
I can’t help you with the other movie, not ringing any bells.
She also has rheumatoid arthritis.
Owww, that’ll do it.
PING
According what I heard and seen, she says she has a slew of other attorneys working for her. I can't picture this a one-man-(woman)-show, her being all over the map???
However, it is good to know, at least, that we have so many competent armchair keyboard jurisprudence commandos here on FR weighing in on this case to "slap" down a foreign and not at least a female PATRIOT, who has balls. I sent her 50 bucks last month and will do same this month. You all go and do the same if you want her to succeed, instead of tear her down!!!
An “After-Birther”???
Don't we now live in times where one has to be rude to get to the truth???
Remember the tactics the usurper himself used with the help of the Chicago "Godfather" gang to advance into the Illinois State house by crushing his opponent who had sealed records, hmmm!!!
Sorry, pal ... when it comes to legal maneuvering (and repeated bungling of same), Orly Taitz has amply demonstrated that she is her own worst enemy.
That is what I would call, your typically chauvinistic misguided opinion!!!
I believe it is rather difficult to underestimate most judges in any capacity, but especially in their capacity to default on the side of morality vs. legally pedantic process. Hence I believe it is simple to overestimate this judge's dedication to "doing the right thing".
Yes, it’s a pretty awful disease.
This is me, not giving a tinker’s damn about your hysterics.
Some of the posters here are ACORN shills. I hope in court she has attorneys helping her. She also should have incorporated Leo’s suggestions on her case with Judge Carter. Leo found a huge opportunity there.
I am concerned that she will not listen to what experienced and competent attorneys tell her.
No top quality attorney would get near this case if they wanted to survive in the law profession and in human life in general.
Rondog could help answer this question as he is in contact with Rhodes.
This has been mentioned on FR.
I see you found the thread... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.