Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Usual Suspects Attack Wicker Amendment (Amtrak to allow packing checked baggage firearms)
NRA - ILA ^ | September 25, 2009 | NA

Posted on 09/28/2009 1:04:49 PM PDT by neverdem


·11250 Waples Mill Road ·   Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683

 
Usual Suspects Attack Wicker Amendment
 
Friday, September 25, 2009
 

Last week, we reported on the Wicker amendment—a NRA-backed amendment to H.R. 3288 (the FY 2010 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development appropriations bill) that would reform policies regarding the transportation of firearms on Amtrak trains.  The measure was adopted by the Senate on Wednesday, September 16, by a vote of 68-30, and would allow law-abiding Amtrak passengers the ability to securely transport firearms in their checked baggage while traveling by Amtrak train. Currently, passengers who choose to travel by passenger rail in the United States cannot transport a firearm in checked baggage as they can on airlines.

Not wanting to miss any opportunity to grandstand and show off his vehemently anti-gun views, New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine (D) sent a letter to Congressional leaders asking them to oppose the Wicker amendment.

The Governor said in his letter, “I am outraged by a provision included in the Senate FY10 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development ("THUD") appropriations bill that requires Amtrak to accept passengers who carry firearms and ammunition in their checked baggage. This provision creates an unacceptable threat to the safety of New Jerseyans.”  Corzine, of course, ignored the fact that American citizens safely transport firearms in checked baggage on airlines every day. 

Corzine went on to say that he “will not allow the NRA to force guns to be transported or carried into places like Newark and New Brunswick Stations, the gateways to our major universities.” 

“Force guns to be transported or carried” into New Jersey?  That’s sensationalism at its finest.  So much for the option of exercising our Second Amendment freedoms.

Another career anti-gun politician also jumped on the bandwagon to punish the law-abiding for political gain—none other than New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.   

We have been reporting a lot lately about Bloomberg’s anti-gun group “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” (MAIG), which has built its membership by selling itself as a group solely interested in fighting “illegal” guns.  A look at its agenda, however, clearly shows that fighting criminals is not what this group is about.  Instead, MAIG has focused its efforts on promoting new gun laws and regulations and on furthering its anti-gun agenda in the courts.

So it comes as no surprise that Bloomberg would also come out against the Wicker amendment.  Speaking from Penn Station on September 20th, Bloomberg said, “If anyone in Congress thinks that the threat of a terrorist attack on a train has gone away, they are sadly mistaken.  And the American people will blame the Senate if a terrorist attack does occur.”  He went on to say, “The legislation allowing guns on Amtrak was passed because of ideological politicsnot public safety.”

Bloomberg was joined by a contingent of local mayors, as well as anti-gun Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D), who concluded, “This shows that the [National Rifle Association] has too much influence over Congress.”

It appears you can add participatory politics by voting citizens to Hizzoner’s growing list of dislikes.



Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=5152


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New Jersey; US: New York
KEYWORDS: amtrak; banglist; bloomberg; corzine; wickeramendment

1 posted on 09/28/2009 1:04:49 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The last time I travelled on Amtrak my Colt 1911 was in my carry on bag. No one even asked to look. Of course this was pre 9/11.


2 posted on 09/28/2009 1:06:23 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Jon won’t be in office much longer. Not that the GOP replacement is a whole lot better but I guess we have to take what we can get in NJ.


3 posted on 09/28/2009 1:06:58 PM PDT by mrsixpack36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Wanna bet a high percentage turn up missing?


4 posted on 09/28/2009 1:08:31 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I am proud to own four firearms which cannot be legally possessed in the State of New Jersey. Corzine can kiss my butt!


5 posted on 09/28/2009 1:08:38 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; jocon307; Alberta's Child; Pharmboy; Calpernia; Malsua; dead; nj26; OldFriend; Clemenza; ...
BANG! Usual suspects indeed!
6 posted on 09/28/2009 1:18:49 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


7 posted on 09/28/2009 8:37:52 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What are the “screening” requirements on Amtrak lines and other rail facilities???

Are they exactly like airlines??? Do I have to “declare” my firearm and ammunition, sign some sort of form, and will that remain discrete from any bagage handlers that work for the rail-line for any stops along the way???

A scenic train ride, tour, trip up thru the Rockies or Tetons was something we would be amiable to, except for the nervous ninnie crowd...

I dunno...


8 posted on 09/29/2009 1:40:59 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The last time I travelled on Amtrak my Colt 1911 was in my carry on bag. No one even asked to look. Of course this was pre 9/11.

Same here.

Do you have to go through any security to board a train?

9 posted on 09/29/2009 5:07:52 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson