Posted on 10/05/2009 8:21:59 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Also see:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2354590/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2353767/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2354167/posts
Of course, I disagree with the age assigned to “Arti”, but other than that, the article makes some excellent points on how this overturns the prevailing Temple of Darwin “wisdom” with respect to human evolution.
All the best—GGG
Thanks for the ping!
Men’s theories come and go like fashion trends; The Word of God hasn’t changed in four thousand years and never will.
Amen, brother!
“Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”
—Matthew 24:35
Seems to me that you are making a much bigger deal of Ardi than the evolution crowd is.
You make a lot of stew from a single oyster.
Is that why I’m seeing Temple of Darwin television commercials advertising various upcoming specials on “Ardi” every single night of the week?
Due to your article I think you are aware of this theory, but others may not be, so if your interested in science and Creation Theory verses Evolution this series is a good starting point for your own investigation. Using science to prove the Bible right.
Hovind Theory
Dammit, now I’m REALLY hungry
In the previous posting on Ardi (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2353588/posts?page=77#77)I mentioned that the line art drawing of the skeletal structure of the remains seemed inconsistent with a constant biped. The article notes that there are scientists examining the remains and are coming up with the same criticisms. The author had a valid discussion and should have stuck to that instead of some of her(?) sneering editorializing. She (?) is correct that the contrary interpretations are not being well reported in the media. As long as the scientific community itself is paying attention the media doesn’t matter that much. Scientists typically don’t rely on sensationalized headlines to guide their opinions.
Oh brother! Ardi was just introduced as the "missing link" and you are already ragging on the ID's? He will supposedly rewrite history blah, blah, blah. Remember the "missing link" found a few months back that was a Lemur monkey"? They had a special program on National Geographic about the time they decided it was just an extinct Lemur monkey.
These "so called" scientists take a few broken bones and let a cartoon artist draw a picture of some ape looking creature with fur they don't even know if he had any, and the evo's get a woodie. Schools all across the country have to scrap their textbooks, and before they are even printed, there is a "new" discovery that will turn history on it's head. Evo had become the biggest scam in history. Lucy has been proven to be a scam, and they still talk about her like it was real. The bones were found scattered over a mile area and they can't even prove that it was from the same animal. Most of these "missing links" bones can fit in a shoe box and the evo's swear that they can rebuild a whole skeleton from a pig's tooth.
As far as GGG making a big deal, Re read the title of the piece.
"Artificially Reconstructed “Ardi” Overturns Prevailing Evolutionary Hypotheses of Human Evolution". "Overturn" is a pretty stiff word. I choose to concentrate on "Artificially Reconstructed".
[[Seems to me that you are making a much bigger deal of Ardi than the evolution crowd is.]]
Apparently you haven’t read the ‘stunning news’ in thousands of publications and blogs about Ardi? And our kids will be taught that Ardi was a ‘common ancestor’ DESPITE the FACT that massive digital ‘reconstruction’ had to happen in order to come up with a ‘common ancestor’-
[[In the previous posting on Ardi (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2353588/posts?page=77#77)I mentioned that the line art drawing of the skeletal structure of the remains seemed inconsistent with a constant biped. The article notes that there are scientists examining the remains and are coming up with the same criticisms.]]
But you watch- NatGeo, The History Channel, the Discovery channel- ALL channels that are watched by impressionable children, WILL NOT MENTION ANY of htose facts, and they WILL still tout Ardi as our ‘common ancestor’, and will undoubtedly invent an elaborate ‘life history’ of Ardi to show how we suppsoedly swung out hte trees, onto the ground, and began inventing space shuttles
The media DOES MATTER a great deal- many many many children wil lbe given a FALSE impression, and wil lgrow up thinking soemthign unscientific
“Of course, I disagree with the age assigned to “Ardi”, but other than that, the article makes some excellent points on how this overturns the prevailing Temple of Darwin “wisdom” with respect to human evolution.” GGG
Oh, quite so. Gazing over the Savanna Grass is looking for love in all the wrong places for Ardi and Friends, As she says it's a tree for me and thee and hopefully three. Now it's small teeth, home and honey instead of just hooking up for a while. No more red in tooth and claw or something like that.
After all the investment of Nat. Geo. in Madison Ave. yesterdays stale decafe Evoulutionary brew better be overturned, and now The Temple of Darwin can say,
“God created Adam from the dust, Well..we created Ardi from the dust, it just took us a little longer”.
We're not to pay any attention to the nay sayers who are really looking at the bones behind the curtains of hype. thanks for the heads up!
I think you may be becoming obsessed!
Not that I don't find it amusing....
obsessed is a pretty weak word for what most of have been seeing...
From time to time I have outbreaks of civility.
succumbing to weakness?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.