To: sonofstrangelove
I've always preffered "Rods from God", space baced kinetic bombardment. Telephone poll sized tungsten rods that are dropped from space and thanks to GPS guidence and good old F=MV2 slam into an installation with kiloton level damage focused in a small area.
2 posted on
10/12/2009 12:27:12 AM PDT by
rmlew
(Democracy tends to ignore..., threats to its existence because it loathes doing what is needed)
To: sonofstrangelove
Quick, someone tell John Kerry.
4 posted on
10/12/2009 12:29:22 AM PDT by
RC one
To: All
6 posted on
10/12/2009 12:44:06 AM PDT by
Cindy
To: sonofstrangelove
I’m reminded just a bit of the development of the GBU-28 for the First Gulf War. It took all of about six weeks to build a bomb that could penetrate the hardened Iraqi command bunkers. IIRC, they use the barrels from old 8-inch SP howitzers for the bomb casing.
7 posted on
10/12/2009 12:50:15 AM PDT by
DemforBush
(Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
To: sonofstrangelove
8 posted on
10/12/2009 12:52:40 AM PDT by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: sonofstrangelove
I have to admit, I'm confused. I think Obamy has already told Israel that they are on their own. Is he going to wait for a mushroom cloud and then send the bunker buster? Is this just talk?
If it were me, in order to do my best to avoid a war, I would tell the world that Israel will have American backing for whatever they need. I think that may make Iran at least know they have NO chance of survival if they don't stop what they are doing.
Weakness will guarantee a war.
9 posted on
10/12/2009 12:59:57 AM PDT by
chuckles
To: sonofstrangelove; ex-Texan
America has the Iranian despotic régime surrounded on three fronts, our Navy in the Persian Gulf coupled with the U.S. Air Force & troops on either side of Iran, in Afghanistan & Iraq. The paramount problem is the appeasing thing in the White House & cohort leftist, elitist, agenda-driven Dems in Congress.
When Israel is forced to preemptively protect herself from Iran's Russian supplied nuclear weapons threats of mass extermination, it's alarmingly clear whose side the despicable White House creature shall favour (America's & Israel's enemies).
10 posted on
10/12/2009 1:34:13 AM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never "free")
To: sonofstrangelove
I want one for fire ant control in my pasture.
18 posted on
10/12/2009 4:11:52 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
("Endeavor to persevere.")
To: sonofstrangelove
What good is this bomb when the President doesn’t have the balls to use it?
20 posted on
10/12/2009 4:23:06 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: sonofstrangelove
Never underestimate our enemies.
21 posted on
10/12/2009 4:32:11 AM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/media/pdfs/20090723ACORNReport.pdf)
To: sonofstrangelove
The Pentagon has acknowledged that it is speeding up plans to deploy a massive bomb capable of knocking out deeply buried enemy facilities. The giant "bunker buster" is believed to add fighting power to the U.S. arsenal against Iran's nuclear program, defense experts argue.Obama will never use it. He will never attack Iran. He likes 3rd world tyrants.
He sees a little bit of himself in Amedinejad and Hugo Chavez
This bunker buster bomb is being displayed to make the Obama regime look more butch as 0bama's says to gays he will end "don't ask don't tell" in the US military.
So far 0bama has been enabling the Iranian nuclear program just like that bald headed stooge El Baredi at the UN
23 posted on
10/12/2009 4:54:53 AM PDT by
dennisw
(Ir's not the Wheel, It's the Carousel)
To: sonofstrangelove
Sh-h-h-h-h, don’t tell Obambi. His good buddies Hugo and I’m-a-dumb-diner-jacket won’t be happy about this. Besides, it’s so, so, so unfair of us because we’re the great, big, bad, meany, immoral Amerika!
29 posted on
10/12/2009 6:32:10 AM PDT by
Happyinmygarden
(Yes, actually, I have pretty much seen and heard it all before...)
To: sonofstrangelove
The use of these bunker buster bombs would require massive air superiority. How many B-2 bombers might be lost to deliver just one such weapon? I would think that a kinetic energy weapon loaded on SLBMs would be a far more credible option.
30 posted on
10/12/2009 6:38:46 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: sonofstrangelove
I'm stunned that the muzzie commissar in the White House would allow this. Hey, he can just send a platoon of those new gay soldiers in their pink camo uniforms over there to solve the problem.
35 posted on
10/12/2009 8:55:16 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(Got Questions? Need Answers? LOOK TO THE CROSS! You will find them there.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson