Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Land Fines Orly Taitz $20K, File Copy of Order with State Bar of CA
United States District Court (Georgia) ^ | 10/13/2009 | Judge Clay Land

Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.

-snip-

Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.

(Full Order at the link.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: afterbirthers; afterbirtherwave; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; civilprocedure; eligibility; judgeland; orlytaitz; truthers; vetters; vetting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,161-1,165 next last
To: LorenC
What makes Obama different from all those other Presidential contenders whose citizenship wasn't questioned in the same fashion?

Because O bama's father was not a citizen of the United States, and according to the definition of "natural born citizen" used by the First Congress in 1990 through to Senate resolution SR511 of 2008, a natural born citizen of the United States must have U.S citizen parents.

The evidence that he is not eligible to hold the office is already in the public domain.

341 posted on 10/13/2009 11:39:06 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
while the order is appealable

To clarify my last post to you, Orly can appeal the sanctions order. She can't appeal the dismissal of the underlying case because she no longer represents Captain Rhodes (she moved to withdraw from representing Rhodes, and that motion was granted).

342 posted on 10/13/2009 11:39:15 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: pissant; All

Due process demands that Judge Land remains unbiased. Anyone reading any of the judge's order can clearly see he's anything but biased and on an agenda. He's also trying to affect the case in front of Judge Carter (which may be an additional reason Judge Carter will not grant Gary Kreep severance).


"A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases." Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955).

A judge can and should be disqualified for "bias, a likelihood of bias, or an appearance of bias." Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 588, 84 S.Ct. 841, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964)


343 posted on 10/13/2009 11:39:35 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Get drunk and act like a fool, then post in on You Tube.


344 posted on 10/13/2009 11:39:42 AM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; humblegunner

I disagree with gunner on Taitz but not Achmed.

Achmed is funny and dies a lot!


345 posted on 10/13/2009 11:40:46 AM PDT by Eaker (Kaiden sez, "If you have a problem and If explosives are an option then explosives are THE answer.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
I know that one is fake.

Okay, so then you conceed that your statement that McCain provided "Record after record" of his birth certificate is fake?

As to Obama's other records, can you name any other president who released any of the records you are demanding? As a reminder, you demanded the following:

1) Kindergarden records
2) Vaccination records
3) College records
4) Passport applications

I know of no other president who made any of the above public. Why should Obama?

346 posted on 10/13/2009 11:41:04 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

See post 340.


347 posted on 10/13/2009 11:42:11 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
The evidence that he is not eligible to hold the office is already in the public domain.

Then why all the fuss about the birth certificate, college records, kindergarden records, etc?

348 posted on 10/13/2009 11:42:22 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
We’re interested in refuting inaccurate information about the law.

Personally I am more interested in what is accurate, according to the law, since judges seem to be able to make it up as they go.

349 posted on 10/13/2009 11:44:00 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Your NEED to twist w/what was said is a liberal tactic. Since I deal in Truth, those tactics make me puke. Therefore, bucko, don’t EVER POST TO ME again! Got that? I couldn’t make it any simpler, so I trust that it is not over your head in understanding.

I have twisted nothing.

I asked a poster why Joe Biden's parallel documentation wasn't being demanded, and it was suggested that I demand it. I pointed out that I, personally, have no doubts as to Biden's eligibility, to which 'presently no screen name' responded with an 'LOL' and a veiled insult about my intelligence.

Nothing was twisted, nothing was falsified.

And per the request that was made, I have not posted this comment to 'presently no screen name.'

350 posted on 10/13/2009 11:45:08 AM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Of course, on appeal, Orly will be subject to Fed R. App. Proc. 38...
351 posted on 10/13/2009 11:45:29 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Funny? Whatever floats your boat.


352 posted on 10/13/2009 11:45:38 AM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Dang it! I got on the wrong bus again.

Which one is the Bozos Bus?


353 posted on 10/13/2009 11:46:51 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: bvw

TRUTH BUMP!!!


354 posted on 10/13/2009 11:47:29 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: BP2

After reading his original decision, full of derision, I’m perfectly happy with taitz telling him to shove it up his piehole.


355 posted on 10/13/2009 11:47:29 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
But wait, buckeyed troll has pinged all his obama supporting trolls and they will be glad to tell us.

It is nice to have a list. I have suspected each of them individually from time to time but the ping list helps validate my suspicions.

356 posted on 10/13/2009 11:48:42 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

He’s covering for a Donkey @$$ liar ... quack like a duck.


357 posted on 10/13/2009 11:48:43 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: kukaniloko

Yeah, but that document only counts as proof of adoption, not proof of birthplace.


However when the school registration form is coupled with Obama’s Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth and the statement verifying it issued by the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, it is corroboration along with two birth announcements for Barack Hussein Obama which appeared in the Sunday, August 13, 1961 editions of the Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulliten newspapers. Both of those papers have confirmed that they have always gotten their birth announcements directly from the Bureau of Vital Records and not from parents or relatives.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen.

I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago...”


358 posted on 10/13/2009 11:51:46 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg
there is discussion on pp25-28 that this judge believes that the proper forum for outing a POTUS who fraudulently concealed his qualifications to be POTUS is in impeachent proceedings.

This is absolutely wrong headed. The proper place is an unbiased court that will decide on the evidence presented.

This Judge full well knows that an impeachment proceeding will never be called by the Democrats in charge of the House, they ar the ones who put him there.

359 posted on 10/13/2009 11:51:46 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
The State of Hawaii has officially certified that he was born there.

No they have not.

360 posted on 10/13/2009 11:52:53 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,161-1,165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson