The primate skeleton "Ida," once called "the link" to an evolutionary ancestor of humans and apes, turns out not to be even close.
To: SeekAndFind
Doesn’t look like a boner to me......
2 posted on
10/23/2009 10:57:21 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(Who's your Long Legged MacDaddy?)
To: SeekAndFind
Every discovery seems to be an attempt to bang that square into the round hole.
I’m not disputing evolution because I am not educated enough in it to dispute anything. However it seems a little odd that instead of discovering things, they try to make a theory hypothosized (sp?) centuries ago to fit now.
3 posted on
10/23/2009 10:57:53 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: SeekAndFind
Most people just don’t have enough Faith to believe in Darwinism. God is a more logical explanation.
Pray for America and Our Troops
4 posted on
10/23/2009 10:58:17 AM PDT by
bray
(Hope and Corruption)
To: SeekAndFind
Did somebody say "big boner"?
6 posted on
10/23/2009 11:12:41 AM PDT by
Jaxter
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum.)
To: SunkenCiv
This will probably get snarky, but what the heck. Ping.
7 posted on
10/23/2009 11:13:32 AM PDT by
colorado tanker
(Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
To: SeekAndFind
Funny thing...
Lemurs are primates.
..Which make the author "not very bright"
8 posted on
10/23/2009 11:18:20 AM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: SeekAndFind
fossil 'link' just a big boner So would we call that a "soft-tissue fossil" or not?
16 posted on
10/23/2009 1:44:49 PM PDT by
r9etb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson