Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paleontologists Target Montana Dinosaur Museum
ICR News ^ | November 9, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 11/09/2009 9:18:40 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

The Glendive Dinosaur and Fossil Museum, which opened its doors earlier this year, boasts this country’s second-largest set of displayed dinosaur remains. The record is still held by the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman. Both are located in Montana near a rich cache of world-famous fossils. The Glendive Museum stands apart, however, in that it presents dinosaurs as having been drowned and their remains preserved in the massive worldwide flood described in the Bible. This view has prompted reactionary comments from mainstream scientists ...

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: creation; crevo; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; maryschweitzer; paleontology; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2009 9:18:41 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 11/09/2009 9:21:30 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

the intellectual elite jihadists are foaming at the mouth yet again....


3 posted on 11/09/2009 9:27:17 AM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

If someone chooses to believe that, it is their own business.

A day with God is as a thousand years (or millions, or billions); we don’t get to set His calendar.


4 posted on 11/09/2009 9:28:24 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
“Nothing's going to stay soft for 65 million years. You can take that to the bank.

Oh really? Try keeping this picture next to your bed.


5 posted on 11/09/2009 9:35:02 AM PST by WackySam (To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

[[Oh really? Try keeping this picture next to your bed.]]

I do! she’s a knockout!!!


6 posted on 11/09/2009 9:42:41 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

I guess there is more than one way to be a knockout!


7 posted on 11/09/2009 9:50:06 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I just love the response from the alleged expert: “I haven't been in the museum, I have not studied the evidence but it's all wrong and not science.” Really it's a laugh out loud statement.
8 posted on 11/09/2009 9:53:45 AM PST by svcw (The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

Out of my head! Out of my head!


9 posted on 11/09/2009 9:57:02 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn thi title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I know for a fact that humans walked with dinosaurs. I saw Raquel Welch do it.
10 posted on 11/09/2009 9:57:08 AM PST by colorado tanker (What's it all about, Barrrrry? Is it just for the power, you live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"we don’t get to set His calendar."

True, the geneologies he gave us in his word do that for us. Old Earthers are simply not believers,

11 posted on 11/09/2009 10:02:52 AM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Translation: Please don’t confuse me with facts!


12 posted on 11/09/2009 10:04:29 AM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
Ooooh...that was too cruel!!!!!!!!!!

CA....

13 posted on 11/09/2009 10:13:00 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've at last found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
[Horner] also stated, “You can't have a debate about science and opinion.”

I have to agree with him. All of the science points to the fact that there was once an inland sea covering much of North America. I can take anyone in Dallas to see white rock outcroppings that show without a doubt that the sedimentation layers were laid down along a long period of time -- not a single, global flood.

Furthermore, if all of the fossils were laid down in a single flood event, we would expect a uniform mixture of fossils. We don't find that. Instead, we find fossilized species grouped in specific layers -- the same layers that we find all over the world.

Did Noah's flood happen? Absolutely -- the Bible tells us so. Did it cover the entire planet? No. The Bible says that it covered eretz -- a word that can mean anything from a local region to the land of Israel (the most common usage) to the entire planet.

God's revelation to us through his creation is no less truthful than his revelation to us through his word. God's creation overwhelmingly tells us that the flood did not cover the entire planet. Since the Bible does not require the entire planet to be covered by a universal flood, then we should not force an arbitrary meaning to a word in the Bible.


14 posted on 11/09/2009 10:18:52 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Lyin' Brian Thomas MS* is at it again...

Mary Schweitzer is famous for having proved that some dinosaur fossils from the nearby Hell Creek formation contain soft tissues, including blood cells.

No, dear Brian, Mary found FOSSILIZED soft tissue STRUCTURES, which she then DEMINERALIZED in an EDTA solution. Not one "blood cell" has been found.....but they did find FOSSILIZED blood cells.

Some things, Brian, need no argument to be made against them. Why give credibility to the lunacy that Man walked in the land of vegetarian T. rex?

15 posted on 11/09/2009 11:05:37 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with 100+ species of large meat eating dinos within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
True, the genealogies he gave us in his word do that for us. Old Earthers are simply not believers.

So which genealogy are you referring to? Note the differences between:

  1. Matthew 1:6-16 versus Luke 3:21-31.
  2. Matthew 1:6-16 versus 1 Chronicles 3:10-16.
  3. Luke 3:21-31 versus 1 Chronicles 3:10-16.
  4. 17 verses in the New Testament call Jesus "the son of David," yet Jesus and David were separated by approximately 1,000 years.
  5. Luke 3:8 says, "Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham." How could the Jews of Jesus' day describe themselves as "sons of Abraham" when Abraham lived 1,500 to 2,000 years before Jesus?

If you understand how ancient (and modern) Jews maintain genealogies, then none of what I mentioned above is a problem. Disobedient Jews are often blotted out from genealogies. Also, Jewish genealogies often refer to prominent people and leave out many generations. In a spiritual sense, the Jews of Jesus' day were "sons of Abraham," but they were not "sons of Abraham" in a literal sense.

If you depend upon supposedly inerrant genealogies to validate your faith, then you're out of luck. The Bible contradicts itself and cannot be trusted as the true word of God. If you understand how Jewish genealogies work, then the Bible maintains its inerrancy but you have yet another reason to toss out young-earth theories.

I've always maintained that the real problem with young-earthers is not that they don't understand science -- they don't understand their Bibles and the underlying Hebrew and Greek very well. I certainly consider young-earthers to be my brothers and sisters in Christ -- we have so, so much in common that our differences are essentially invisible in comparison. However, I have personally seen the faith or potential faith of so many people damaged when they find out that young-earth theology completely contradicts what God has revealed to us through his creation and in his word.


16 posted on 11/09/2009 11:17:02 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
God's creation overwhelmingly tells us that the flood did not cover the entire planet.

I'm not a YEC, but this statement does not follow from anything else you said.

17 posted on 11/09/2009 11:26:39 AM PST by Sloth (For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of the International Olympic Committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

@ElectricStrawberry

I agree 100% with your conclusion that things like a salad-munching T. Rex frolicking with Adam and Eve don’t deserve a serious response. However, Mary Schweitzer and others after her have found soft, elastic tissue with an intact 3-dimensional structure after the tissue structures were demineralized.


18 posted on 11/09/2009 11:26:47 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

Say, that’s a good point:
“Not one “blood cell” has been found.....but they did find FOSSILIZED blood cells.”

Or to put it another way, “No dinosaur bones have found. Not one, only FOSSILIZED BONES.”

How’s that?


19 posted on 11/09/2009 11:29:02 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry
@ElectricStrawberry,

Also, note what Mary Schweitzer -- a real scientist and a conservative, Bible-believing Christian -- had to say about the "museum."

But Dr. Schweitzer dismissed the museum’s content without any firsthand investigation, stating, “I haven't been to the museum. But I think the whole subject of a creation-based museum combines really bad science and really weak faith….It's a misunderstanding of what is a science to begin with....If you're doing science, you have to play by certain rules. They're trying to rewrite the rules of science and call it science.”


20 posted on 11/09/2009 11:30:24 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson