Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senior Dem 'confident' Stupak amendment will be stripped
The Hill ^ | November 9, 2009 | By Michael O'Brien

Posted on 11/09/2009 9:29:40 AM PST by MaestroLC

A top House Democrat said Monday she's "confident" that a conference committee will strip language in the House health bill on taxpayer funding for abortion.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the Democrats' chief deputy whip in the House, said that she and other pro-choice lawmakers would work to strip the amendment included in the House health bill that bars federal funding from going to subsidize abortions.

"I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won't be there," Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. "And I think we're all going to be working very hard, particularly the pro-choice members, to make sure that's the case."

The amendment, offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), won the support of Republicans and some centrist Democrats in the House.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 111th; abortionamendment; agenda; amendment; bhohealthcare; cultureofcorruption; dem; democratcorruption; democrats; democratscandals; flipflop; healthcare; howtostealanelection; liberalfascism; moralabsolutes; obamacare; pelosilied; pelositruthfile; prolife; socializedmedicine; stripped; stupak; wassermanschultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
There's a sucker born every minute.
1 posted on 11/09/2009 9:29:42 AM PST by MaestroLC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Hey, yellowdogs...got your Hope and Change right HERE.


2 posted on 11/09/2009 9:31:57 AM PST by 50sDad (The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

There will be no conference report. The Senate will not pass any bill.


3 posted on 11/09/2009 9:31:57 AM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Every single Democrat in the House needs to be booted out of office in 2010.
The lone Republican and any others who voted for this bill needs to be booted out of office in 2010.

They are totally out of control.

No money for abortions.
No money for illegals.
Serious restrictions on lawsuits regarding medical efforts.

The only ‘winners’ in this bill are the Tort Lawyers.


4 posted on 11/09/2009 9:32:41 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
"I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won't be there," Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. "And I think we're all going to be working very hard, particularly the pro-choice members, to make sure that's the case."

And when that happens, most of the RATS who said the amendment had to be in there in order for them to vote Yes will still vote Yes.

5 posted on 11/09/2009 9:33:11 AM PST by Dahoser (The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

I must be the dumbest guy on the block. Let me see. The House Bill wouldn’t have passed without the Abortion Amendment. So, Wasserman-Schultz says she is confident it will be stripped out in Conference with the Senate Bill (Which still has a long way to go). So, if it gets stripped out, what makes her think those pro-life Democrats will vote for it then when they wouldn’t vote for it unless it was in there last Saturday? Can anybody explain this to me?


6 posted on 11/09/2009 9:35:13 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Political THEATRE?


7 posted on 11/09/2009 9:36:19 AM PST by goodnesswins (Become a Precinct Committee Person/Officer....in the GOP...or do NOT complain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Political THEATRE?


8 posted on 11/09/2009 9:36:33 AM PST by goodnesswins (Become a Precinct Committee Person/Officer....in the GOP...or do NOT complain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
"The amendment, offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), won the support of Republicans one stupid SOB RINO and some centrist Democrats in the House."

OK...

9 posted on 11/09/2009 9:36:50 AM PST by jessduntno (TOTUS fails and POtuS becomes a phuttering stuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Stupak is just a useful idiot for the Dems.


10 posted on 11/09/2009 9:37:18 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

the Senate cant pass this nonsense. The result of this passing is just unimaginable .. i foresee another revolution if they force this crap on us.


11 posted on 11/09/2009 9:38:02 AM PST by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Debbie is a mindless robot and Nancy’s pet gerbil.


12 posted on 11/09/2009 9:38:02 AM PST by clintonh8r (My country. Not my government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

She is a very slimy POS, even for a ‘rat.


13 posted on 11/09/2009 9:38:14 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

You’re right I don’t get how that works.

rep 1: Don’t count me in unless the pizza comes with pepperoni.
rep 2: OK, here’s our order with pepperoini
rep 1: cool, count me in!

senator: sorry, we’re taking out the pepperoni.


14 posted on 11/09/2009 9:38:44 AM PST by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

That puts them on record.


15 posted on 11/09/2009 9:39:41 AM PST by listenhillary (A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"Stupak is just a useful idiot for the Dems."

No, he's a calculating idiot, those voting for him are useful idiots.

16 posted on 11/09/2009 9:40:14 AM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

Was there ever any doubt?


17 posted on 11/09/2009 9:42:04 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
This was the problem of tying one's objections to this dog of a bill to that ONE issue. Once that was supposedly removed, those who had objected had nowhere to go. But their constituents, especially the truly pro-life ones could see through the charade of the Stupak amendment, even if the Blue Dogs couldn't or wouldn't.

If nothing else, the exchange between John Boehner and Charlie Rangel on the floor of the house on Friday should have been a wake up call. Boehner asked Rangel if the Democrats would guarantee that abortion funding wouldn't be put back IN the bill when it went to the Reconciliation Committee. Rangel essentially laughed in Boehner's face, and said NO, there were no guarantees. So the Blue Dogs and Joseph Cao, who got their 'assurances' with the Stupak Amendment, will get sold down the river when the bill gets to Reconciliation.

18 posted on 11/09/2009 9:44:51 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Stupak was just looking for an excuse to vote for this monstrosity.


19 posted on 11/09/2009 9:47:14 AM PST by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

****There’s a sucker born every minute. ****

Not if they are aborted first!

Ok, that was cruel!


20 posted on 11/09/2009 9:47:26 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (The sword does not kill. It is a tool in the killer's hand.---Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson