Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Victoria Delsoul

No I can’t understand anyone that would defend this woman’s behavior as being anything but evidence that she is unfit for any role as a role model.

The fact that her private life has been leaked, is a pity. That happens when you send digital information illustrating yourself masterbating.

The fact that she defended marriage as a man and a women is no more significant than if she said that water was wet and the sun gave off light.

If TRUTH is your foundation, then by all standards, this person spoke it and for a while we cheered because so few speak it much less recognize it.

When your apologetics become mirrored by the left’s argument of: “don’t throw stones” etc. that is when you lose all base for your argument .

She isn’t a demon because she has been embarassed, she isn’t a hero because she spoke the truth and she isn’t a leader or model to uphold for obvious reasons.

She’ll do well in whatever career you can succeed in by flaunting your bosom in a bikini and using the natural beauty to titilate and lure lustful admirers.

There seems to be no limit to those.

As fer my spillin, i so sorry you wer uffended.


60 posted on 11/17/2009 11:31:49 AM PST by panzerkamphwageneinz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: panzerkamphwageneinz
She’ll do well in whatever career you can succeed in by flaunting your bosom in a bikini and using the natural beauty to titilate and lure lustful admirers.

LOL! Me? Nah, I never had any desire to take my clothes off and make sex videos, and I never had any desire to compete in any of those bikini competitions, though if I wanted to, I'm sure I could have done well.  I have never given any nude pics to anyone.  Indeed, I don't have any nude pics of myself,  period. I do wear a bikini when I go to the beach, though. So I assume your comments are in regard to Carrie, your use of language notwithstanding.

Details of her private life being made public doesn't invalidate her statement in defense of heterosexual marriage, which has always been my point. And defending someone's constitutional right to privacy (which I did) isn't being an apologist, but just an observation by someone who knows and respects the constitution, and believes that privacy is still a right.

Your comment “The fact that she defended marriage as a man and a women is no more significant than if she said that water was wet and the sun gave off light.” tells me that arguing with a dunce is always a bad idea.

62 posted on 11/17/2009 8:15:29 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson