Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nathan Deal calls on Obama to produce birth certificate proving he's eligible for presidency
The Savannah Morning News ^ | November 18, 2009 | Larry Peterson

Posted on 11/17/2009 10:40:49 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Congressman running for governor calls on president to produce birth certificate.

It's the question that keeps poking its head up through piles of debunking documents: Is Barack Obama eligible to be president?

U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal says Obama can dispel it with a birth certificate showing he's a U.S. native and therefore qualified for the White House.

Deal, a Republican running for governor in 2010, called on Obama on Tuesday to "put the matter to rest ... and provide the documentary evidence."

But two independent fact-checking groups and the state of Hawaii say he already has. Their conclusion: Obama was born Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu.

Deal, who discussed the matter when a reporter asked about it earlier this month, was asked about it again Tuesday during a campaign stop in Savannah.

"My office, and I'm sure many other offices," the Gainesville lawmaker said, "continue to get inquiries. ... The president has the ability to put this to rest completely, and I think he should do that. ...

"It takes up my staff's time. We are constantly required to answer these kinds of inquiries. ... I'm willing to take his word for it, but I think he needs to convince those who still have doubts."

Under the U.S. Constitution, only native-born citizens may serve as president. Hawaii became a state in 1959.

Early in the campaign for the 2008 presidential election, critics of Obama argued he was born in another country.

Obama's presidential campaign posted online what it said was a copy of the document.

FactCheck.org said its staffers have "seen, touched and photographed" the certificate and concluded it's genuine.

PolitiFact said it sent an online copy to Hawaii's Department of Health and that the department responded the document is authentic.

The Associated Press has reported it received the same response from the department.

Both fact-checking groups have posted online rebuttals of contentions by Obama critics that the document is a fake.

And FactCheck.org has posted online a copy of a birth announcement it said was published Aug. 13, 1961, in the Honolulu Advertiser.

The announcement says a son was born to "Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama" on Aug. 4.

Several judges have rejected lawsuits based on claims Obama is not lawfully president.

In July, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed such claims as "made-up fictional nonsense."

Asked why the issue keeps surfacing, Gibbs responded, "Because, for $15, you can get an Internet address and say whatever you want."

"This question has been asked and answered, and I have no additional comment," White House Spokeswoman Gannet Tseggai said Tuesday.

Deal, due to continue campaigning in Savannah today, said he and other House members will sign a letter to Obama asking him to provide the birth certificate.

"They just want to get it off their plate," he said. "... It just needs to be put to rest."

But he did not appear eager to press the matter.

"I did not think that was an appropriate question to be asking in regard to a governor's race," he said, referring to the initial inquiry.

A reporter posed the question during what was billed as an online chat between Deal and supporters.

If Obama will "simply tell us where we should refer ... inquiries that come to our offices," he added Tuesday, "we'll do that. And we'll be satisfied."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; blackhelicopters; certifigate; conspriacytheory; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamao
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It was OK to question McCain’s eligabilty as the democrats
did, but you get called an idiot for questioning big O.
Why is it that big O has paid out $150,000 to date for his
lawyers to quash any attempts to examine his true birth
certificate and his college documents?
41 posted on 11/18/2009 9:46:06 AM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wow, a repub with actual balls! I’m fully expecting the treasonous Obots in the rest of the GOP to start pressuring him out though.


42 posted on 11/18/2009 11:09:39 AM PST by IntolerantOfTreason (The AMERICAN President should be an AMERICAN, NOT an AFRICAN-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Gaining momentum, it seems.

The more he acts Un-American, the more people will want this challenged. The 9/11 trial is just a slap in our face. Thanks for the ping.

43 posted on 11/18/2009 1:51:33 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Yes. Being born to a US Citizen mother makes one a "natural born" citizen whether the birth occurs on the soil of Hawaii, Kenya, Antarctica, or Mars.

That child may be a citizen; it doesn't follow that the child is a natural born citizen. How can you conclude the child is natural born?

44 posted on 11/18/2009 4:10:01 PM PST by 1andyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only thing Barry Zeero has produced thus far is a lot of propaganda, misdirection, obfuscation, and redirection.

He has produced ZERO as a factual accounting of his lineage.

Period.


45 posted on 11/18/2009 5:01:31 PM PST by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Of course it’s a deliberate obfuscation.

And it’s “freedom of SPEECH,” not “freedom of expression.” If the Supreme Court hadn’t invented “freedom of expression,” they’d have a tough time defending nude dancing as “speech.”


46 posted on 11/18/2009 5:15:30 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I read your statement and see that your post is itself an obfuscation. Obfuscation is all you have.

It’s the self-imposed prison of leftist thinking. By the relativistic nature of their view of reality, leftists have forfeited their own access to rational discourse.

You shouldn’t be surprised or offended, it’s your chosen path. Alinsky came the closest to admitting the truth when he idolized the prince of chaos.


47 posted on 11/18/2009 5:15:44 PM PST by reasonisfaith (When liberal ideology is put into practice it accomplishes, universally, the opposite of its claims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Rinos are not going to like this threat of exposure one bit. They are really dead meat when it becomes clear that Obama is not a NBC and they were in on the cover-up and traitors to the constitution.


48 posted on 11/18/2009 5:30:59 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Prediction: I think one day we will all wake up and find the White House empty, Zero and the belt lady gone, wisked off to some foriegn country in hiding (just like Osamas Family after 9/11) with lawyers in DC fighting for his legal right to return to power (like Honduras).


49 posted on 11/18/2009 5:39:36 PM PST by VastRWCon (Drill Baby Drill - Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1andyman
How can you conclude the child is natural born?

Because the child has citizenship by birthright, not by subsequent naturalization. Duh.

50 posted on 11/18/2009 7:29:54 PM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Because the child has citizenship by birthright, not by subsequent naturalization. Duh.

Very good, but I didn't ask how you concluded the child was a citizen; I asked how you concluded the child was a natural born citizen. Do you even know there is a difference?

51 posted on 11/18/2009 11:37:40 PM PST by 1andyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 1andyman

“Mother was a citizen” = “citizen by birthright” = “natural born citizen”. Please try to keep up with the class.


52 posted on 11/19/2009 4:31:52 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
What are the rules for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986?

Again, children born abroad to two US citizen parents were US citizens at birth, as long as one of the parents resided in the US at some point before the birth of the child.

When one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14. An exception for people serving in the military was created by considering time spent outside the US on military duty as time spent in the US.

While there were initially rules regarding what the child must do to retain citizenship, amendments since 1952 have eliminated these requirements.

Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen mother were US citizens if the mother was resident in the US for a period of one year prior to the birth of the child. Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen father acquired US citizenship only if legitimated before turning 21.
53 posted on 11/19/2009 5:27:26 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
So, bureaucratic rules can change the definitions of the words in the Constitution? I didn't think the Powers That Be in Washington had gotten quite that brazen yet....
54 posted on 11/19/2009 5:56:12 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

http://www.visalaw.com/05jan1/2jan105.html


55 posted on 11/19/2009 6:58:46 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

http://www.visalaw.com/05jan1/2jan105.html


56 posted on 11/19/2009 6:58:58 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Because, for $15, you can get an Internet address and say whatever you want.”

And for $15 and a .44 cent stamp he can put this to rest. But noooooo, lets drag it thru the courts for years and millions of dollars and wasting the courts time with all of these lawsuits.

PS. BHO is creating jobs by keeping this out there!LOL


57 posted on 11/19/2009 7:06:12 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Become a monthly donor or FR won't be here for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Are you sure you’re telling the truth?

What were the laws in Hawaii at the time? Assuming O was born there.

Isn’t it true that the “citizen” mother had to be at least 21?

All of this though makes me wonder WHY Obama doesn’t just release the long form birth certificate, along with the dozens of other documents, like his LSAT scores.

We just want transparency. The Birthers wouldn’t have a point if Barack was transparent. Of course, the fact that EVERY SINGLE FRIEND of HIS is a raging lefty gives America lovers cause for pause.


58 posted on 11/19/2009 12:57:30 PM PST by BertWheeler (Dance and the World Dances With You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bumperoo!


59 posted on 11/19/2009 5:52:10 PM PST by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson