|
Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 11/20/2009 4:54:47 AM PST by Paladin2
An unknown person put postings on some climate skeptic websites that advertised an FTP file on a Russian FTP server, here is the message that was placed on the Air Vent today:
We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.
We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents
The file was large, about 61 megabytes, containing hundreds of files.
It contained data, code, and emails from Phil Jones at CRU to and from many people.
Just in time for Copenhagen too.
Huh?
What does this mean?
More details please.
Multiple previous threads posted on this; try a search.
UK climate guy: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/pjones/
CRU = “Climate Research Unit”
Apparently some emails (content ???) has been leaked.
There's been a suspicion that the people who claim that the globe is getting warmer have been cherry-picking their data - i.e. using data that supports their position while deliberately leaving out significant amounts that do not. What this data breach means is that other scientists will be able to see all the data they're looking at, and judge for themselves whether the charge of cherry-picked data is accurate.
|
This reeks of hoax.
Excellent!
I may have inadvertently had a hand in this millennium graph! I recall getting a fax from Jack with a hand-drawn graph, that he asked me to review. Where he got his version from, I don't know. I think I scribbled out part of the line and amended it in some way, but have no recollection of exactly what I did to it. And whether he edited it further, I don't know. But as it was purely schematic (& appears to go through ~1950) perhaps it's not so bad. I note, however, that in the more colourful version of the much embellished graph that Stefan circulated ([1]
http://www.politicallyincorrect.de/2006/11/klimakatastrophe_was_ist_wirkl_1.html the end-point has been changed to 2000, which puts quite a different spin on things. They also seem to have fabricated a scale for the purported temperature changes. In any case, the graph has no objective basis whatsoever; it is purely a "visual guess" at what happened, like something we might sketch on a napkin at a party for some overly persistent inquisitor..... (so make sure you don't leave such things on the table...).
THANKS!!!!!
Wow this is amazing!
Lucia,
Found this on JeffIds site.
http://noconsensus.wordpress.c…..en-letter/ It contains over 1000 mails. IF TRUE … 1 mail from you and the correspondence that follows.
And, you get to see somebody with the name of phil jones say that he would rather destroy the CRU data than release it to McIntyre.
And lots lots more. including how to obstruct or evade FOIA requests. and guess who funded the collection of cores at Yamal.. and transferred money into a personal account in Russia
And you get to see what they really say behind the curtain.. you get to see how they “shape” the news, how they struggled between telling the truth and making policy makers happy.
you get to see what they say about Idso and pat micheals, you get to read how they want to take us out into a dark alley, it’s stunning all very stunning. You get to watch somebody named phil jones say that John daly’s death is good news.. or words to that effect.
I don’t know that its real..
But the CRU code looks real"
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7806#comments
The lying bastards got caught.
They were manipulating data to create “global warming”.
I hope this goes viral all over the world. It’s time to put Al Gore and all of these One World socialists out of business.
I understand your skepticism, but it's 60+ Megabytes of stuff.
That's a LOT of hoaxing to do...
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N.
The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
In other words, this is the raw data Algore has been trying to hide or ignore. The actual "man behind the curtain."
This is the proof that he is lying, that he KNEW he was lying, and that it has now been exposed...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
