Posted on 12/02/2009 8:28:11 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[[Can you believe this guy?!]]
Yeah- I think everyone pretty much is gettign pretty tired o NL’s constant childish whining and attemptign to set himself up as slef-appointed hall monitor- Jim has clearly stated that any news- or any defense of religion can be posted anywhere- especially front and center-
Huh?
Snakes shed their skins and rabbits don't. That is a difference between snakes and rabbits that explains why we see snake skins and not rabbit. What difference between reptiles and mammals explains why we find entire mammoths intact, with skin like rawhide, but no dinosaurs in a similar condition?
I think that only the science is evil crowd shares that opinion. But, to quote Rhett Butler, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn." (BTW - what exactly is "slef-appointed"?)
[[I think that only the science is evil crowd shares that opinion.]]
That crowd, first of all, would be your crowd- and second of all- there’s a good many peopel fed up with you and htosel ike you cosntantly trying to manipulate FR despite the fact that Jim has repeatedly stated GGG has the right to post his articles front and center-
[[”Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.”]]
Oh yes you do- otherwise you wouldn;’t have responded- per usual- you’re fooling noone
It felt like a tickle, and smelled like hell!
Accidents happen, now go clean yourself.
Reptiles have very fragile skins, while pachyderms have tough skins riding over a thick band of fat. Also the dinos mostly were swamp dwellers, while mammoths dwelt in mountains and plains.
If you don't like my posts don't read them. As soon as falsehoods stop being posted I will stop refuting them.
I hope you are not making fun of disabled veterans again.
I think it’s unwise, if not silly to build a huge castle complex on vague Scriptural phrasing . . . even considering root word meanings . . .
It is far too much of a stretch to me, to consider the world 6,000 years old and I don’t believe Scripture even hints solidly that it is.
God had lots of options and has lots of options. He could have arranged what we OBSERVE any number of DIFFERENT ways.
Hyper Creationists insist it was one very narrow limited way. Idiot evolutionists think it was another very narrow limited stupid way.
GOD IS MUCH BIGGER THAN EITHER ANEMIC STORY.
It was obviously NOT an issue that God wanted us to have exhaustive information on in His Word. Doh. Acceptance of that fosters a lot of humility and peace.
Hate to bust your bubble but, scientifically, AGW is a hypothesis. An educated guess that is being rigorous tested and debated in the scientific community. Evolution of species is a theory, meaning it has been tested over and over and based on many experiments, has been shown to be predictively correct. That doesn’t mean it is to the best of our abilty, that would be a Law, correct.
A theory is not a hypothesis. Just FYI.
What do you mean “Huh?”. You’ve just been exposed making false statements and you go on quibbling??
He’s obviously disabled, but I doubt that he’s a vet. (He probably goes to a vet for his meds though)
Evolution has failed to predict anything.
It called for gradual change which is not in evidence anywhere on Earth. Zero transitional evidence Zip, nada!
Thanks for the ping!
My MOS was 11B20P. Do you want to compare DD214s?
I made no false statements.
Got an answer for my question yet?
To: Natural Law
Don’t ever post profanity in Keywords again.
26 posted on Thursday, December 03, 2009 12:04:26 AM by Admin Moderator
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2398993/posts?page=26#26
You claimed that the recent hadrosaur find was entirely fossilized; that clearly is a false statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.