Posted on 12/02/2009 12:02:15 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Being as how I'm a God, Country, Family, small government, traditional American values, Life & Liberty patriotic kind of guy, Sarah Palin IS my cup of tea. My cup runneth over!
I pray she runs.
You’re an idiot.
I saw that someone had linked to this thread on Sarah’s facebook page yesterday :) calling it ‘big news’ from the ‘biggest Conservative site on the net’. Its probably way back in the comments on her page now.
That would have been me who linked it...I go by a different name over at Sarah’s FB page.
Evidently Daniels is not a social conservative, which means that he is not conservative, which means that you can give up on him, even though you signed up yesterday under yet another name to push him here.
Ad hominem attacks don’t often answer questions.
You guys are a third party group with your creator running as Alan Keyes veep and you are dishonestly attacking the competition.
That is the worst effect goofy third parties can have, promoting liberals by supporting the democrat party.
Your question has been answered repeatedly. You just refuse to listen.
Les for life
As others have said, PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCH.
1. Morgan Christen served on Planned Parenthood in the early 90s when they first came to AK and promoted adoptions - BEFORE they started performing abortions.
2. And as governor, Sarah upheld the AK constitution for her constituents, of which the main point is that Alaskans get their fair share of resource development. The other judge was a RADICAL GREENIE and would have BLOCKED, BLOCKED, BLOCKED AK’s resource development.
3. She did take the unprecedented step of asking the board to send over ALL the materials they had on both candidates and so did a far more EXHAUSTIVE review of both candidates than any previous governor had done.
If you don’t like Sarah, go start a post supporting your candidate and RESEARCH your candidate and PROMOTE your candidate.
You are not convincing anybody here with your POOR research and HIGHLY suspect motives.
And judge #2 was also a radical activist who had actually published writings saying judges should legislate from the bench.
Whereas Christen interpreted the AK constitution in her judgments and did not try to rewrite it.
Do you get why Sarah chose her yet?
ditto
Funny how much you sound just like another obfuscating Freeper
on this topic.
Same crazy arguments about evil PP.
SarahPAC Scrubs Site: Within 24 hours of the launch of ProlifeProfiles.com, Sarah Palin’s political action committee removed their own glowing news report of the governor’s appointment of an unrepentant Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court. You can see:
- the broken link
- ProlifeProfiles pdf archive of Palin’s PAC page
- the current Google cache of the page (which may expire) and our on-site html archive
SarahPAC removed their report of Palin’s appointment demonstrating that if you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps, got hit. By this SarahPAC is telling you that they realize how incriminating this information is and rather than a humble acknowledgment from Sarah, instead she will cover-up. While National RTL and the pro-life industry continue to allow the Body of Christ to be deceived into thinking that Sarah is 100% pro-life, she cannot hide her record from God, nor from the public. Please pray with us that Sarah will apologize to the children of Alaska, specifically those who have been dismembered since March 4, 2009, for appointing an “outstanding” unrepentant child killer. SarahPAC took this information down; ProlifeProfiles put it back up. Welcome to the end of child killing in our lifetime.11
http://prolifeprofiles.com/palin#SarahPAC
I’ll include DeMint and Bachmann on that list.
In her interview with Rush, you put it all in a nutshell: A Party must stand for something. Her aim now is to set the standard for candidates in the 2010 election. My guess is that this gives the RNC heartburn.
In her interview with Rush, you put it all in a nutshell: A Party must stand for something. Her aim now is to set the standard for candidates in the 2010 election. My guess is that this gives the RNC heartburn.
In her interview with Rush, you put it all in a nutshell: A Party must stand for something. Her aim now is to set the standard for candidates in the 2010 election. My guess is that this gives the RNC heartburn.
My fallback is Ikea, just up the road, maybe half mile, mile?
They have a HUGH parking lot there. We’re planning on being their when the line starts at 6 am, but even then, the parking lot may be full before half an hour, I’m betting! It’s not that big.
Oh, well, we’ll deal with whatever comes our way—Maya’s going to have some great memories of her Sarah Palin adventure! :-)
“Evidently Daniels is not a social conservative...”
All the evidence is that Daniels is both a fiscal and social conservative. If you have evidence to the contrary, go ahead and post it and inform all of us. I’d like to know myself why you have that opinion because I haven’t heard it before and want to know if it has any basis in fact.
You signed up yesterday to push Daniels and you cannot counter the simple observation that he is not a social conservative.
He is your guy not mine, we can all just forget about him and move on, evidently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.