Posted on 12/03/2009 7:42:53 PM PST by USALiberty
Suppose someone really believes that their son/daughter is possessed by a spirit and the correct approach is to starve and bleed them while inducing diarrhea through purgatives. If you bring a real doctor in, he's not going to pull up his big boy pants and help with that. He's going to say, this is nuts, stop it. It's foolishness doing harm.
Orly Taitz’s legal briefs are illogical, unreasoned, unprofessional, borderline hysterical at times, and on several occasions actively harmful to the interests of her clients. She's also soliciting donations under the pretense of having an actionable legal case when any real lawyer knows she doesn't.
Think about it. Something as potentially earth-shattering as this? If top drawer lawyers believed there was a real case there, you'd see some on it. There are plenty of high profile conservative lawyers with demonstrated bona fides who have taken on political cases they believed had merit. That not a single one would touch this with a ten-foot pole speaks volumes about where the real delusion lies.
“One thing I have noticed is that justice seems to be a game for lawyers. Not knowing how to file a brief derails an entire proceeding.
Bingo!”
Just like surgery seems to be a game for surgeons. Not knowing the mechanics of how to do it can derail an entire career. Imagine that.
No you wouldn’t. Top notch lawyers wouldn’t touch a case like this for less than $4 million dollars. The Huns could be chasing all of us and you’d be going show me the money! That’s why it’s wonderful we have a volunteer military to defend us.
AGAIN, I applaud Orly Taitz and support her efforts. At least she’s making one...whereas YOU are not.
Orly’s not making any headway in any court.
Go back to DU. People are wise to to here.
The kind of name recognition this would bestow on top level lawyers if it had any merit would be priceless. Unfortunately, it doesn't have any merit. Haranguing real lawyers for failing to take up meritless cases is, in reality, simply congratulating them on their discernment and ethics.
Why would the Huns be chasing us all over this? And why would I be saying show me the money if they were? If this is some weird World War II reference, just let me note for the record that I fully support fighting both Nazi German and Imperial Japan. I'm not sure how useful a frame of reference that is for case law, however, particularly regarding issues of standing.
Oh, and also for the record, I was in the military when it wasn’t all volunteer. I like to think we still did an okay job.
ObamaGate will not be touched by the leftist media. Also looks like the conservative talk show hosts will not touch the issue either, that is except for Rev. Manning, Lou Dobbs, and Michael Savage. They have been asking the questions for some time.
“Ms. Taitz still has her law license?”
What little faith I had in the legal system is gone.
McCain did not do anything more than Obama to establish his eligibility.
“Frankly she’s doing one hellova job”
As evidenced by how many cases she has won and how little she has been rhetorically beaten like a red-headed stepchild by almost every judge she has gone in front of in this conspiratorial wet dream.
Oh wait....never mind.
Orly’s not making any headway in any court.
Oh she’s making plenty of headway just the wrong kind and in the wrong direction for her sake. She’s been able to raise the bar on $s assessed against her at least. Now that is headway. lol
Orly is a very brave woman. I am surprised she is still living and breathing.
Sounds expensive to me.
Sounds expensive to me. Why not just prove the documents and allow the case to go to the Supreme Court. QED ( in my opinion.)
Filing a few papers in three cases, most of which were likely based on templates/pre-existing motions filed in other cases, was not that expensive for the private attorneys. Because Orly is so ... prolific ... in filing paper after corrected paper after paper, the DOJ has had to file a few more papers than the private attorneys had to file. Still, the job’s been pretty small and at least should have been inexpensive - to date - because the DOJ has only responded when required, and responded with short, concise briefs. Their most recent brief was a 2-pager - copied from their last brief (eliminating one page of argument). Pretty simple. Not expensive.
She might even get a state dinner invitation before all of this is done.
Should it develop that the fed/gov has known all along the complete story on 0’b then we have a case of massive fraud aided and abeted by the chief justice of the USSC, and many others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.