The computer model will be attacked!
New species might arise as a result of single rare events, rather than through the gradual accumulation of many small changes over time, according to a study of thousands of species and their evolutionary family trees.
How convenient. A Scientific Process that is exceptional, rare, unrepeatable, and gives us exactly what we need to explain what we see.
Gee, I think creation is a "single rare event" which gives rise to a new species.
The bigger issue is that if biologists abandon Darwin’s natural selection model, what will creationists call evolutionary biologists?
Like the male sex hormone testosterone, oxytocin is produced in the hypothalamus
IMHO, the author is probably confusing the specific hormone receptors with the hormones.
H1N1 influenza adopted novel strategy to move from birds to humans
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
I have complete faith in science. I trust what they find in their laboratories to be true and faithful.
Everytime an article or a post uses the phrases “scientific” or “scientist” I perk right up, save it to favorites and live my life by it.
I especially trust the scientists at the Climate Research Unit.
/SARC
Ping
Nothing says both mechanisms, gradual and “burst” can’t be going on at the same time. But I would tend to agree that new species probably evolve more in response to gross changes in the environment. Either way though, to get a new species, there would need to be an isolated population. Otherwise you’d get a changed species, but still only the one.
Sounds like the hypothisis that all life had one beginning...
I’m a little rusty in this (college bio major), but what makes this different than punctuated equilibria, ala Steven Jay Gould?
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks neverdem. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
This is the way science is supposed to work: scientists throwing rocks at each others theories. The problem with the global warming crowd was that they managed to get hold of the publication process and prevent publication of any rebuttal.
Just keep saying to yourself
“the religion is settled”
“the religion is settled”
“the religion is settled”