Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Birth Announcement in 1961 confirmed
The Post and Email ^ | Dec. 11, 2009 | John Charlton

Posted on 12/11/2009 1:04:21 AM PST by Electric Graffiti

STAR BULLETIN EDITION OF AUG. 14TH, ON FILE AT BERKLEY IDENTICAL TO PUBLISHED IMAGES by John Charlton

The Post & Email has just received PDF files from a highly credible source, establishing that the birth annoucement in the Star Bulletin Edition of Aug. 14, 1961, for Barack Hussein Obama, is authentic.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: anndunham; antibirthers; article2section1; barrydunham; barrysoetoro; believableberkeley; birth; birthannouncement; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; britishsubject; certifigate; citizen; citizenship; colb; colbaquiddic; dualcitizen; dualcitizenship; dunham; eligibility; hawaii; honolulu; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; larrysinclairslover; lawsuit; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamacolb; obamacrimes; obamafamily; obamatruth; obamatruthfile; passport; pdfphoney; phoneypdfs; soetoro; stanleyanndunham; stanleydunham; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 481-488 next last
To: Electric Graffiti
"I believe in large part it debunks the notion that the announcements were somehow forged. To be honest, I was somewhat crestfallen that Barry’s birth appeared. I was looking for the smoking gun…"

We are not going to find any "smoking gun". We can hope for dirt to be uncovered, but frankly the man is already covered in dog shiite. Dirt would be a step up for him. I beg anyone who has ears to hear this: It is about the Constitution, fellow Freepers. It will never be about a birth certificate. The certificate is a ploy in one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. The smokescreen is the millions paid to lawyers as though something sinister is to be discovered in Hawaii. The most is the we can obtain from the bc is further verification of O's father as a British subject. They have conspired to hand us over to our enemies, these "men of honor" in our government. They changed the Constitution before our eyes, just like Copperfield made the jet aircraft disappear a few years back...

281 posted on 12/11/2009 5:24:15 PM PST by scottiemom ("As a Texas public school teacher, I would highly recommend private school")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

NS has been here a lot longer then you joe


282 posted on 12/11/2009 5:25:00 PM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Congress did pretty much the same thing for Obama with their resolution on the 50th anniversary of Hawaian statehood. So the two are even.

So the two are even?

In what matter are they even??

At least we got to see McLam's long-form with all the details your usurper don't want us to see!!

283 posted on 12/11/2009 5:26:38 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Of course it's entirely possible and highly likely that a teen-aged liberal arts major was so well versed in U.S. citizenship law that she immediately knew that her baby boy's status as a natural born citizen and future president was in danger, so within hours of birth she initiated a long distance conspiracy from her base of operations in a third world armpit of a city to make sure that the proper paperwork was forged and filed.

Not a future president (usurper), but because they then could game the system with multiple social security numbers and the like!!!

284 posted on 12/11/2009 5:30:33 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianAdam
If Obama were to supply a physical copy of his COLB or original (provided he still has it, as he claims in his memoir), to whom should he provide the original copy?

I did not know anyone who wants Obama's old birth certificate he said he found in a book. I want a Hawaii records certified long form birth certificate because he said he was born in Hawaii. A gvmt vital records everyone born in America and living now has.

You feel a child is born in the US, they are given one copy of their BC and we have no other official records?

Obama has to release from Hawaii records the original long form that states the hospital, physician etc. Hawaii records said he has a form of BC there. As you recall they said they could not release it unless Obama signed?!

Everyone has seen the copy online of what Obama wants everyone to believe, I know few who want to see another. I want forensic, signed and sealed and traceable in Hawaii records.

Obama can release it to all of congress and senate,but the release must allow it to be traceable in Hawaii records. In other words, I want to see it on all records pertaining to Obama as I do with my family who has nothing to hide.

I mean come on, what is he hiding on a BC? It is the most innocent document a human can ever have.

285 posted on 12/11/2009 5:31:19 PM PST by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

These are questions that the lemmings will do their best to cover up and deflect!!!


286 posted on 12/11/2009 5:35:28 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Maybe you think it is silly that he is also a British/E.U. citizen with voting rights in U.K.!!!


287 posted on 12/11/2009 5:38:00 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

beneath his intellectual status
_______________
LOL! Did you forget the sarcasm tag for the Kansas king of copy and paste?


288 posted on 12/11/2009 5:38:43 PM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: onyx; wintertime

Actually, the idea came from FReeper wintertime.

I’ve left them on car windows, books and/or magazines that are for sale...be creative!


289 posted on 12/11/2009 5:39:15 PM PST by azishot (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

and? That means nothing, absolutely nothing. My wife belongs to a fashion forum and some of the worst trolls are some of the oldest members. Take a stroll back through NS’s posts on the forum. Look at the name calling, how he stalks the BC threads. Besides, no wonder you would take up for him since you are on the troll list floating around.


290 posted on 12/11/2009 5:42:07 PM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
But what's done is done.

Okay,tired. You believe that Obama may have become POTUS through fraudulence but it is all good because he was able to pull it off.

Gotcha!

Show me where it says Obama must stay in office if proven not eligible?

291 posted on 12/11/2009 5:42:44 PM PST by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
Like another poster, you're assuming that because you aren't satisfied with the vetting, it didn't occur. That's not true. Whether it was adequate vetting or not, it met the legal requirements that exist.

There is no assumption on my part. Obama's online BC verified by his people means as much to me as Obama's ACORN recently saying they did nothing wrong by their own investigation. If there was proper vetting Hawaii would be allowed to release Obama's BC.

It was assumed Obama had been vetted properly by Chicago thugocracy. Pelosi wanted power so bad she signed off on the vetting. Obama WAS NEVER VETTED properly.

And if there was a inkling to vetting you mention, Cheney would be first to show the records as he was mentioned in a lawsuit. Cheney was duped by the false vetting and he knows it.

You see tired, when someone is caught in multiple lies, most people do not believe them. At that point you need to show some validation. Other wise you get a whole lot of lawsuits and poll numbers dropping like climategate validity.

292 posted on 12/11/2009 5:59:59 PM PST by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

Comment #293 Removed by Moderator

To: OafOfOffice
You're statement is incorrect.

“You believe that Obama may have become POTUS through fraudulence but it is all good because he was able to pull it off.”

There is nothing demonstrably fraudulent.

He met the vetting requirements that exist, whether you like them or not.

He has a legal COLB that says he was born in Hawaii, one that the state of Hawaii isn't disputing.

A court in Indiana has upheld existing Supreme Court precedent that you don't have to have two citizen parents to be an NBC. He was elected and inaugurated with everyone knowing his father wasn't a citizen.

Game over. Against that, your suspicions are meaningless. Obama doesn't have to prove the negative. You have to prove he did something wrong. And let's see... Hmmm. To date you have no legally actionable cases a court will act upon even defined, let alone meaningful evidence to dispute any of the above.

If proven ineligible, I wouldn't say Obama must stay in office. Show me where you've got anything even close to doing that, because all the hyperventilating paranoia on these threads won't cut it.

294 posted on 12/11/2009 6:01:47 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
“There is no assumption on my part. Obama’s online BC verified by his people means as much to me as Obama’s ACORN recently saying they did nothing wrong by their own investigation.”

Legally, it doesn't have to mean anything to you. Your suspicions have no legal standing.

“If there was proper vetting Hawaii would be allowed to release Obama’s BC.”

No state requires that. Legally, the COLB is adequate to establish place of birth.

295 posted on 12/11/2009 6:05:11 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

obumpa


296 posted on 12/11/2009 6:10:18 PM PST by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

It’s just a high stakes three card monte game, and all they are doing is hiding the real BC. We arent fooled.


297 posted on 12/11/2009 6:20:09 PM PST by Canedawg (Bring lawyers, guns and money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
Nothing you posted here is reality. You are repeating the same TIRED posts with nothing to back up your position.

There is nothing demonstrably fraudulent.

What do you need to demonstrate Obama is a fraud? Or do you care, more to the point? Prove he did not defraud the people in each state he ran? Show his original BC with hospital and physician. Do you have one? I can underatand if you are not from here not understanding natural born and birth certificates.

Obama was not vetted at all. There is no records to prove he was anywhere but Pelosi's signature saying she did. There's a stellar recommendation most would refuse.

Because no one thought a communist fraudulently could get into office, does not mean we have to keep him there. Criminals have been dealt with before and in countries not based on freedom as are in America. Obama will be found out. Truth always wins over evil.

Goodnight tired. Your posts are merely obama/axelrod talking points.

298 posted on 12/11/2009 6:20:49 PM PST by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

What is the Chrysler lawsuit? I have not heard of that one.

Thanks.


299 posted on 12/11/2009 6:42:03 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: curiosity; fr_freak

No, the spokesman for the newspaper said as far as he knew they were supplied by the dept of health, but he wasn’t around then. He also didn’t know if they only came that way.

I remember threads about that or at least discussed that particular point.

If you can find direct quotes that support what you said, post em!


300 posted on 12/11/2009 6:44:49 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 481-488 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson