Skip to comments.
Compare Daily Sea Ice For Yourself based on Satellite Data
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/ ^
| Dec 16, 2009
| Cryosphere Today
Posted on 12/16/2009 6:34:39 PM PST by Maelstorm
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: change; climate; dyi; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
This is for those who would like to compare sea ice cover in the arctic going back to 1979. What is interesting is that there is nearly no difference at all. The more recent images seem to show a more ice though I'm not an expert.
1
posted on
12/16/2009 6:34:40 PM PST
by
Maelstorm
To: Maelstorm; rdl6989; Darnright; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; livius; DollyCali; FrPR; ...
2
posted on
12/16/2009 6:35:55 PM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: Maelstorm
“Snow cover data is displayed only for most recent dates”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Almost gave me a heart attack for a moment there. What!? No snow in the arctic on 12/30/1979?!?
3
posted on
12/16/2009 6:37:49 PM PST
by
sinanju
To: Maelstorm
Note to self: Need to hire more Eskimos to claim there’s no ice and their village is being washed away.
4
posted on
12/16/2009 6:39:11 PM PST
by
sinanju
To: Maelstorm
If you look at this page, it seems that the amount of ice in the Arctic Basin is increasing.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/recent365.anom.region.1.html
5
posted on
12/16/2009 6:47:20 PM PST
by
urroner
To: Maelstorm
Depends on your choices of dates to compare. I've gotten some which show much greater difference than those which you show, though none showing as much difference as Algore claims.
The problem is I haven't been able to display them, when posting them side by side, on a small scale like yours - they end up being huge , and you can't see a side-by-side comparison. I'm using Seamonkey, I think a current version.
To: Maelstorm; Apple Blossom; BabyBMW; theKid51
7
posted on
12/16/2009 6:58:27 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Free the Navy Seals)
To: Maelstorm
You can see there are two ice free areas in 2008 which were covered in 1979. The Sea of Okhotsk, at top right, and the Barents Sea along the western coast of Novaya Zemlya, below center right. More importantly, the winter coverage doesn't show the difference that the summer minimum does, and this is where the biggest change has occurred. Here's a comparison with the same tool for 9/15/1979 and 9/15/2008:
8
posted on
12/16/2009 7:06:03 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: Maelstorm
Another look at it year-to-year
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20091005_Figure6.mov
Based on this, the ice cap has decreased since '79 but has grown from its low of '07.
9
posted on
12/16/2009 7:18:49 PM PST
by
phredo53
(Caution: This post does not comply with White House standards.)
To: Maelstorm
You might want to start with this page.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/ To really see what is been going on you have to study this awhile. Start with the graphs. Just comparing the same exact date from 2 different years may not show you a true comparison. First WHICH years are you going to compare? Global warming guys want to use 2007 one of the lowest ice years. Some years you actually would want to compare a Nov with a Dec for example to get an accurate comparison, not Nov to Nov. Spring early one year, late another.
I find it particularly convenient that data for much of 2009 has been removed. Hmmmmm. Why don't I trust this STORY?
10
posted on
12/16/2009 7:20:55 PM PST
by
faucetman
(Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
To: faucetman
I heard a climatologist explaining this varies, goes through cycles, etc. He mentioned years prior to 1979 when a US nuclear sub was able to surface at the North Pole, another in which a ship sailed quite far North without an ice breaker.
11
posted on
12/16/2009 7:26:24 PM PST
by
Williams
(It's the policies, stupid)
To: Maelstorm
To: Maelstorm
To: Maelstorm
So how do we know it’s not related to the Earth’s wobble? Antarctic sea ice is growing and the North pole has shifted already.
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
15
posted on
12/16/2009 8:28:53 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: Williams; Maelstorm
To: dr_lew
That is a better comparison than the September/December image at the top of the thread.
Based on your comparison there was significantly more ice on the same date 30 years ago.
To: dr_lew
Oops, I was looking a #8 for the sept-dec. comparision, not the top of the thread.
To: dr_lew
Nevermind, I screwed up that one too. I’m tired and babbling.
To: Williams
I heard a climatologist explaining this varies, goes through cycles, etc. He mentioned years prior to 1979 when a US nuclear sub was able to surface at the North Pole, another in which a ship sailed quite far North without an ice breaker
...and folks forget that the first NW passage traverse was made in 1903/1905 in a small wooden sailing vessel.
No icebreakers involved...:^)
20
posted on
12/16/2009 9:59:59 PM PST
by
az_gila
(AZ - need less democrats - one Governor down... more to go.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson