Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Oklahoma) Lawmakers File "Freedom of Healthcare Choice Act"
rightsidenews.com ^ | 12/22/09 | Mike Ritze

Posted on 12/22/2009 6:38:39 PM PST by TornadoAlley3

OKLAHOMA CITY - The voters of Oklahoma will have the opportunity to preserve the existing health care system in Oklahoma under legislation sought by three state legislators.

State Reps. Mike Ritze and Mike Reynolds and state Sen. Randy Brogdon announced today that they will file legislation enacting the "Freedom of Healthcare Choice Act," allowing voters to preserve the existing healthcare system in Oklahoma regardless of congressional action at the federal level.

The legislation will allow a vote of the people to opt out of the proposed federal system.

"It's clear the overwhelming majority of Americans want the current doctor-patient relationship preserved instead of having Washington bureaucrats dictate medical decisions," said Ritze, a Broken Arrow Republican who is also a board-certified family practice physician and surgeon. "The proposals under consideration in Congress are likely to result in reduced access to a family doctor, rationing of services, or even outright denial of care if a pencil-pusher decides it is not a 'best practice.' My legislation would give the voters the ability to protect and preserve their existing health care coverage."

"The United States' health care system is the envy of the world and the people of Oklahoma should have the opportunity to maintain the top-notch care they have received while also avoiding the onerous burdens the proposed federal law would impose on working families," said Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City.

"The proposed legislation in Washington is a massive overstepping of the bounds placed on Congress by our U.S. Constitution," said Brogdon, R-Owasso. "It is time that we the people tell Congress enough is enough - and now Oklahomans will have the opportunity to do so."

Modeled on an Arizona proposal, Ritze and Reynolds' legislation would place language on the ballot to amend the Oklahoma Constitution to declare what types of health care systems could lawfully exist in the state.

The proposed constitutional amendment would

Prohibit any law or rule from directly or indirectly compelling any person or employer to participate in any health care system; Allow any person or employer to pay directly for lawful health care services without paying any penalties or fines; Permit a health care provider to provide directly purchased lawful health services without paying any penalties or fines; and Stipulate that subject to reasonable and necessary rules that do not substantially limit a person's options, the purchase or sale of private health insurance will not be prohibited. The amendment would not change what health care services a provider is required to perform or what health care services are permitted by law.

"This is an issue that could have serious consequences for all citizens and it is only right to allow voters a direct role in the outcome of this debate," Ritze said.

"I was not surprised that the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate kept the specific language of their bill from the public and most of their members," Reynolds said. "In comparison, the language of our "Freedom of Healthcare Choice Act" will be fully disclosed as soon as it is filed, probably later this afternoon. We welcome any discussion."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; freedom; healthcare; lping; military; obama; obamacare; oklahoma; sovereignty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2009 6:38:42 PM PST by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Booooyah. Now that should leave a mark.


2 posted on 12/22/2009 6:40:49 PM PST by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Good move. Now we need 49 more...


3 posted on 12/22/2009 6:41:00 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government -- Thomas Payne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Excellent. That durned old Constitution! Drat!

The Tenth Amendment lives... only 50 states to go.


4 posted on 12/22/2009 6:42:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (H.C. Bill, saves more in second decade, despite taxation w/o benefits for first 4 years. Suuurre...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Woo hoo!! Way to go Oklahoma!!


5 posted on 12/22/2009 6:43:31 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! May God and TEA save the Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

56.


6 posted on 12/22/2009 6:43:51 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Beautiful!! Tell the fedzilla monstrosity to take a flying leap. Bravo!


7 posted on 12/22/2009 6:44:05 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Yeah!


8 posted on 12/22/2009 6:44:13 PM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

I am going to push for Alabama to do the same. If all the good conservative states do this, all the welfare scam artists and illegals will move to the liberal states!!


9 posted on 12/22/2009 6:45:59 PM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

I agree but those who opt-out (as I would) will still be taxed oppressively by the government to pay for those who don’t pay for themselves.

I applaud these gentlemen and hope they succeed along with many other states but we still must defeat this bill and defeat those who voted for it next November!


10 posted on 12/22/2009 6:47:22 PM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

This is proposed and hopefully will continue to move forward and pass.


11 posted on 12/22/2009 6:47:33 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The healthcare issue along with the rise in states passing Firearms Freedom Acts, should give us a good solid foundation to run all this liberal, political bovine scatology up the food chain and bring a nice sold 10th Amendment case to the Supreme Court.


12 posted on 12/22/2009 6:49:05 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

never thought i’d say it but.....i may have to move North to.....OKLAHOMA!!!!!


13 posted on 12/22/2009 6:49:59 PM PST by is_is (VPD of Sgt Dan, Former 2/5 MARINE - "Sleep Well America......Your Marines have your Back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Dream on. Ever heard of the Supremacy Clause?

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

I know. You'll say that Obamacare is not pursuant to the Constitution. But under the Constitution, who gets to decide? The Congress will pass it. The president will sign it. So your last hope will be the SCOTUS, from which there is no appeal. I'd like to see how the court would fashion a decision that Social Security--retirement insurance we are forced to buy--and Medicare---health insurance we are forced to buy, are Constitutional, but this isn't. You think they're going to overturn Social Security and Medicare? Fat chance.

Therefore, I believe this act will be Constitutional, as decided by the powers granted in the Constitution to the three branches. The states can piss and moan all they want, but no law will stop it. It will take all out rebellion.

If that's the course they want to take, that's fine by me. The sooner we get out from under the Constitution, the better. But stuff like this is grandstanding.

14 posted on 12/22/2009 6:50:21 PM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

We are truly a red state. When you have had enough of California, come join us here, we’d love to have y’all! God Bless America.


15 posted on 12/22/2009 6:50:47 PM PST by beefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laserman

See post #10. Fred Thompson had it right. You can’t take water from one side of the bucket without affecting the other. As long as the fed gov’t can tax and tax and tax we will pay and pay and pay.

Conservative states need to do much more than this. It’s time for a balanced budget amendment to gain traction.


16 posted on 12/22/2009 6:50:53 PM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farlander

17 posted on 12/22/2009 6:51:27 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; ForGod'sSake

Oklahoma is OK *bump*


18 posted on 12/22/2009 6:52:55 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Bless them. Some real Americans still exist.


19 posted on 12/22/2009 6:53:37 PM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

No, the 57th hasn’t actually passed it yet. LOL


20 posted on 12/22/2009 6:53:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne (H.C. Bill, saves more in second decade, despite taxation w/o benefits for first 4 years. Suuurre...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson