Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Furor Erupts Over Atheist Display At State Capitol
CBS ^ | 12/24/09 | Adam Harrington

Posted on 12/24/2009 7:49:55 AM PST by Former Fetus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last
To: Former Fetus

I would put a sign next to theirs. “Hey Atheist’s, if you do not recognise GOD he will not recognise you. And you are going to be dead a long, Long, time.”


61 posted on 12/25/2009 7:30:44 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUH2O Repub

“This is a CHRISTIAN Nation.”
_______

No this is a wholly secular nation with many Christians in it.


62 posted on 12/25/2009 7:32:22 AM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LifeComesFirst; CharlesWayneCT

My point is not that these people don’t have the right to say it, but that government should not beexpected to promote one religion bashing another. Might as well let the Klan put up an anti-Catholic display. I’m not in favor of vandalism, but the content of the sign puts it well outside the legitimate role of government.


63 posted on 12/25/2009 8:23:36 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The “co-president” of the Freedom From Religion Foundation answered that one on O’Reilly. It’s because the days only get longer from here, so it’s a celebration of coming out of darkness. Of course, that’s just tap dancing so they can explain why they don’t work on Christmas and still give gifts, party, etc.

I plan to call the FFRF today and see if they’re in. Anyone want to make bets? :-)


64 posted on 12/25/2009 8:28:55 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry
No this is a wholly secular nation with many Christians in it.

A nation whose third president, a deist, gave Christian missionaries money right out of the treasury.

Given the statements of the Founders and Framers, arguing that this is a secular nation is like arguing that we're not an English-speaking nation because the Constitution doesn't officially establish English.

65 posted on 12/25/2009 8:34:07 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

Oh yeah? Just get out your constitution and see where it establishes this as a Christian Nation. Its right here in Article ... um... I’m looking for it ... gotta be here somewhere.... [nervous laughter] ...mmmm... I’ll have to get back to ya on that...

But it is, just take everyone’s word for it.


66 posted on 12/25/2009 8:45:16 AM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

This isn’t about agreeing with their sign, it is about the law that gives all of us our rights, be it Christian, Atheist, Buddhist, or Moonie. Those rights gives us our freedom to seek God, we can’t seek Him freely if we aren’t free in the first place. If we start banning other displays, we become no better than those who try to ban Christmas displays.


67 posted on 12/25/2009 8:47:40 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz
Just get out your constitution and see where it establishes this as a Christian Nation. Its right here in Article ... um... I’m looking for it ... gotta be here somewhere.... [nervous laughter] ...mmmm...

Having trouble finding it? It's in there keep looking.

I'll check back later to see if we need to bail you out.

68 posted on 12/25/2009 8:50:07 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

My point is not that these people don’t have the right to say it, but that government should not be expected to promote one religion bashing another. Might as well let the Klan put up an anti-Catholic display. I’m not in favor of vandalism, but the content of the sign puts it well outside the legitimate role of government.


69 posted on 12/25/2009 8:53:21 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Promotion would be if they put it up themselves, in this case, it seems they simply offered the space for all to put up displays, thus the variety described.

Atheists have used the argument often that Christmas displays are ‘bashing’ them or are hate in some sort. We should rise above that.

Their display does their side far more harm than good. We should rise above their antics and let the people see them and decide which represents the spirit they would rather be in, a spirit of love or a spirit of hate.


70 posted on 12/25/2009 8:56:15 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Well, if I can reluctantly agree that the Nazis have a right to mock Jews in Skokie I suppose I can reluctantly agree that the atheists have a right to mock Christianity in Springfield. The act remains rude, insulting, and typical of those whose chosen mode of self-expression is to offend. It obviously isn't above either group, however. Pity that.

And a Merry Christmas to all. You don't have to believe in anything to wish happiness on others. You do have to be a bitter, arrogant, and ultimately futile human being to insist on denying it, even if it appears to you an illusion.

71 posted on 12/25/2009 9:11:52 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
You don't have to believe in anything to wish happiness on others. You do have to be a bitter, arrogant, and ultimately futile human being to insist on denying it, even if it appears to you an illusion.

When in doubt, quote Heinlein:

"A religion is sometime a source of happiness, and I would not deprive anyone of happiness. But it is a comfort appropriate for the weak, not for the strong. The great trouble with religion — any religion — is that a religionist, having accepted certain propositions by faith, cannot thereafter judge those propositions by evidence. One may bask at the warm fire of faith or choose to live in the bleak uncertainty of reason — but one cannot have both."

72 posted on 12/25/2009 9:20:55 AM PST by GL of Sector 2814 (One man's theology is another man's belly laugh -- Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Atheists have used the argument often that Christmas displays are ‘bashing’ them or are hate in some sort. We should rise above that.

That's bilgewater. What you're calling "rising above" is just accepting a vicious slur as if it were fact. It's like letting Al Sharpton get away with saying the neighborhood department store is allied with the Klan because they sell white sheets.

Their display does their side far more harm than good. We should rise above their antics and let the people see them and decide which represents the spirit they would rather be in, a spirit of love or a spirit of hate.

Nice as a general principle, but the problem is that setting a precedent where the government tolerates diplays bashing other faiths on its property is far more damaging to our civic life than any benefit we could hope to realize by just accepting the lies.

73 posted on 12/25/2009 9:41:03 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER; Diverdogz

Given the statements of the Founders and Framers, arguing that this is a secular nation is like arguing that we’re not an English-speaking nation because the Constitution doesn’t officially establish English.

You do know that there’s nothing in the Constitution that says we’re an English-speaking nation, right?


74 posted on 12/25/2009 9:42:56 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

As much as I respect Heinlein, his statement is silly in a world where Aquinas, Augustine and Newton (just to name a few) have gone before him.


75 posted on 12/25/2009 9:44:38 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas! Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

I agree, I’m not christian, I am an american.

If we allow religious iconography on public lands, then it has to be open to all. Freedom of speech is tough, but we are a free country. Either let everyone put something up, or no one put something up, we don’t have a state religion in America.


76 posted on 12/25/2009 9:46:49 AM PST by 200 Motels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814
I like Heinlein. That drivel is, however, insupportable by its own putative standards. He states that one cannot both enjoy reason and bask in the comforts of religion. It is an assertion that is challenged by the evidence of a vast number of intelligent people who consider themselves perfectly happy in both.

It isn't really much of a logical proposition. The critic states that in his opinion the two are incompatible and hence in his opinion people cannot be happy with both. The commonality is "in his opinion." Mine is that he is mistaken. I have evidence. He does not.

My principal point remains, however, that to go out of one's way to deliberately mock another's beliefs at a time when they are most vulnerable to such mockery is an act of rudeness and intolerance. It should be beneath well-adjusted adults. Would you agree with that?

77 posted on 12/25/2009 9:48:39 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Communism was athiestic, and enslaved more minds than any force in history. Churches are by far the largest charities in the world

Communism was atheistic, but it wasn't atheism. By that logic, churches are religious so we're okay to equate them with jihadist mosques.

78 posted on 12/25/2009 10:25:53 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LifeComesFirst
Or do you think Christians are exempt from respecting other people’s rights?

They don't like the competition. They like to use their majority position in the public and government to give their religion special standing and exclude others.

79 posted on 12/25/2009 10:30:40 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
>The atheist religious view was posted alongside a nativity scene

LOL, would you care to clarify the "atheist religious view" thing?

80 posted on 12/25/2009 10:37:00 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson